Identification and prevention and control suggestions of heavy chemical industry risks in the Yangtze River Economic Belt
-
摘要: 从流域-行业-区域/城市多级角度，系统梳理了长江经济带布局性风险、局部突发事故型风险、污染排放累积风险、有毒有害污染物潜在慢性风险等长江经济带重化工风险问题。基于长江经济带典型区域重化工现状分析及风险分析，针对流域总体及各行业/区域特征，统筹制定重化工布局与风险防控方案，实现分类分区施策。提出了园区分级动态管理、现有与新建园区分类管理的流域重化工布局方案。此外形成了跨部门、区域协同防控，应对突发事故型环境风险；管理-技术协同发力，防范累积爆发风险；统筹流域与产业类型，开展潜在慢性风险防控的分类防控方案，以期为长江经济带典型区域、驻点城市提供可借鉴的重化工风险系统性解决方案与防控技术，助力长江经济带高质量绿色发展。Abstract: The heavy chemical industry risks in the Yangtze River Economic Belt were systematically analyzed from the multi-level perspectives of basin, industry, region and city, including layout risk, local sudden accident risk, the cumulative risk of pollution emission, and the potential chronic risk of toxic and harmful pollutants, etc. Based on the current situation analysis and risk assessment of heavy chemical industry in the typical regions of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, the heavy chemical industry layout and risk prevention and control schemes were formulated and the policies of classification and zoning implemented, according to the overall characteristics of the basin and various industries/regions. The schemes included hierarchical dynamic management and classified management of existing and new parks. In addition, some precise prevention and control options were also proposed, including implementing cross-department and regional collaborative prevention and control to deal with the environmental risks of sudden accidents, realizing management-technology synergy to prevent cumulative outbreak risk, and coordinating river basins and industry types to perform prevention and control for the potential chronic risks. The study could provide systematic solutions and control technologies for heavy chemical industry risks for typical regions and stationary cities in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, so as to promote high-quality green development of the Yangtze River Economic Belt.
-
图 1 长江经济带石化企业数量占比及产能分布
Figure 1. Proportion and capacity distribution of petrochemical enterprises in the Yangtze River Economic Belt
图 2 2017年长江经济带各省（市）工业污染排放量
Figure 2. Industrial pollution emissions of each province in the Yangtze River Economic Belt in 2017
图 3 2017年长江经济带各省（市）石化行业常规污染物与特征污染物排放量
Figure 3. Emissions of conventional pollutants and characteristic pollutants in petrochemical industry of each province in the Yangtze River Economic Belt
图 4 长江经济带各省（市）工业园区污水排放受纳水体的断面水质类型统计
Figure 4. Cross-section water quality types of sewage discharge receiving water bodies of industrial parks in 11 provinces in the Yangtze River Economic Belt
图 5 2017年长江经济带有毒有害“三废”污染排放量占全国比例
Figure 5. Proportion of toxic and harmful "three wastes" emissions in the Yangtze River Economic Belt in 2017
表 1 长江经济带各省（市）已认定化工园区数量
Table 1. Numbers of recognized chemical industrial parks in each province in the Yangtze River Economic Belt
家 省（市） 定位化工园区 定位化工集中区 培育/新建园区 四川 19 云南 5 重庆 8 贵州 6 1 湖北 51 湖南 10 江西 25 安徽 38 浙江 49 3 江苏 14 15 上海 3 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 2018年长江经济带各省（市）不同行业重化工企业分布情况
Table 2. Distribution of heavy chemical enterprises of different industries in provinces of the Yangtze River Economic Belt in 2018
家 省（市） 石化 钢铁 制药 有色 皮革 印染 造纸 农副食品 四川 940 210 471 198 134 306 276 1 208 云南 376 80 150 191 7 30 83 628 重庆 252 89 133 119 74 52 106 458 贵州 271 112 152 95 48 30 72 376 湖北 1 018 240 394 149 156 885 238 1 565 湖南 1 586 182 354 448 465 288 319 1 590 江西 1 026 96 371 613 301 605 174 556 安徽 1 058 133 480 219 329 678 224 1 608 浙江 2 210 564 430 744 1 611 4 609 933 670 江苏 4 141 759 681 943 530 4 188 544 1 453 上海 2 036 343 457 423 522 1 231 1 766 439 总计 14 914 2 808 4 073 4 142 4 177 12 902 4 735 10 551 注：本研究所指重化工泛指生产资料的生产，为生产过程中化学方法占主要地位的过程工业，主要包括炼油、石化、无机化工、印染、制药、精细化工、钢铁、有色等行业。
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 长江经济带11省（市）工业举措落实成效
Table 3. Implementation effects of industrial measures in 11 provinces along the Yangtze River Economic Belt
工业举措 实施成效 省（市）数量 工程数量/投入 时段 优化产业结构布局，
淘汰落后产能淘汰落后和过剩产能涉及企业 11 1 746家 2018年 落实1 km无新建化工园区 11 “散乱污”涉水企业排查，取缔“十小”企业 11 2 486户 2017-12—2018-03 落实企业进园区，
规范工业园区规范管理建设污水收集管网 11 5.56万km 截至2019年年底 深入推进排污许可证制度 核发排污许可证 11 8 000余个 2017年至今 推进“三磷”综合整治 长江经济带2.4万km岸线及沿岸
2 km区域入河、入海排污口排查7 60 292个 2019年 排查整治长江“三磷”专项中存在问题的企业 7 172家 2019年 加强固体废物规范化管理 完善并推广应用全国固体废物管理信息系统，
初步形成全国固体废物管理“一张网”11万家 截至2018年年底 严格环境风险源头防控 摸清尾矿库底数 11 1 105座 截至目前
下载: 导出CSV
表 4 四川省沿江12家工业园区各类风险贡献率
Table 4. Proportion of various risk contribution rate in 12 industrial parks along the Yangtze River in Sichuan Province
风险类型 贡献率/% 突发事故型风险 14.5 潜在慢性风险 29.4 累积风险 56.1
下载: 导出CSV
表 5 湖北省武汉市主要突发性水环境风险源类别
Table 5. Categories of main emergent water environmental risk sources in Wuhan, Hubei Province
风险源类别 主要控制单元 重大环境风险 环境风险
企业府河朱家河口
长江杨泗港
长江白浒山生产事故引起超标排放；重大安全事故引发危险化学品、有毒有害物质泄漏；危险化学品和危险废物贮存、利用、处置不当，造成泄漏 港口码头 长江白浒山
长江杨泗港
汉江宗关重大安全事故引发危险化学品、有毒有害物质泄漏；危险化学品和危险废物贮存、装卸、处置不当，造成泄漏
下载: 导出CSV
表 6 江苏省南京市某化工园区排水特征污染物超标排放统计
Table 6. Discharge statistics of characteristic pollutants exceeding standards in a chemical industrial park in Nanjing, Jiangsu Province
企业
代号特征污染物 是否存在超标
特征污染物名称 浓度/(μg/L) 企业1 苯酚、甲醛、间二甲苯、邻二甲苯、对二甲苯 甲醛，5 270；
其他，ND是 企业2 苯、甲苯、乙苯、二甲苯、对二甲苯、邻二甲苯、间二甲苯 苯，12.5；甲苯，711；乙苯，3 897；对二甲苯，1 304；间二甲苯，2 917；邻二甲苯，1 934 是 注：ND表示在检出限以下。
下载: 导出CSV
表 7 近年来长江经济带较大/重大环境事件统计
Table 7. Statistics of major environmental events in the Yangtze River Economic Belt in recent years
区域 2017年 2016年 2015年 2014年 重大 较大 重大 较大 较大 重大 较大 全国/起 1 6 3 5 5 3 16 长江经济带/起 1 3 2 3 4 2 9 占比/% 100 50 66 60 80 66 56
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 黄贤金, 毛熙彦, 李焕. 长江经济带资源环境与绿色发展[M]. 南京: 南京大学出版社, 2020. [2] 习近平.在深入推动长江经济带发展座谈会上的讲话[J]. 当代党员,2018(13):4-8. [3] 徐芸, 朱惇, 贾海燕, 等.长江上游宜宾至泸州江段突发水污染风险评估[J]. 三峡生态环境监测,2020,5(1):14-22.XU Y, ZHU D, JIA H Y, et al. Risk assessment of sudden water pollution in the Upper Yangtze River (Yibin-Luzhou Section)[J]. Ecology and Environmental Monitoring of Three Gorges,2020,5(1):14-22. [4] 张以飞, 付丽洋, 毕军, 等.江苏工业园区突发环境事件风险评估体系研究[J]. 环境污染与防治,2020,42(11):1430-1435.ZHANG Y F, FU L Y, BI J, et al. Research on the risk assessment system of environmental emergencies in industrial parks of Jiangsu Province[J]. Environmental Pollution & Control,2020,42(11):1430-1435. [5] YU X B, LI C L, HUO T Z, et al. Information diffusion theory-based approach for the risk assessment of meteorological disasters in the Yangtze River Basin[J]. Natural Hazards,2021,107(3):2337-2362. doi: 10.1007/s11069-020-04418-6 [6] YAN J J, QU Z G, LI F, et al. Heavy metals in the water environment of Yangtze River Economic Belt: status, fuzzy environmental risk assessment and management[J]. Urban Climate,2021,40:100981. doi: 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100981 [7] ZHENG H, KONG S F, YAN Y Y, et al. Compositions, sources and health risks of ambient volatile organic compounds (VOCs) at a petrochemical industrial park along the Yangtze River[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2020,703:135505. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135505 [8] LENG Y F, XIAO H L, LI Z, et al. Occurrence and ecotoxicological risk assessment of perfluoroalkyl substances in water of lakes along the middle reach of Yangtze River, China[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2021,788:147765. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147765 [9] ZHANG Z M, ZHANG J, ZHANG H H, et al. Pollution characteristics, spatial variation, and potential risks of phthalate esters in the water-sediment system of the Yangtze River estuary and its adjacent east China Sea[J]. Environmental Pollution,2020,265:114913. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114913 [10] 韩丽明.长江经济带11省市化工企业园区现状调查及对策分析[J]. 环境保护与循环经济,2020,40(2):87-90. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1021.2020.02.022 [11] 罗良文, 赵凡.工业布局优化与长江经济带高质量发展: 基于区域间产业转移视角[J]. 改革,2019(2):27-36.LUO L W, ZHAO F. Industrial layout optimization and high quality development of Yangtze River Economic Belt: from the perspective of interregional industrial transfer[J]. Reform,2019(2):27-36. [12] 国家统计局, 2019年中国统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2019. [13] 龚华俊, 白颐, 李岩, 等.石化化工产业区域优化发展简析[J]. 化学工业,2020,38(3):12-21. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9647.2020.03.003GONG H J, BAI Y, LI Y, et al. Brief analysis on regional optimization development of petrochemical industry[J]. Chemical Industry,2020,38(3):12-21. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9647.2020.03.003 [14] 长江经济带发展统计监测协调领导小组办公室. 2018长江经济带发展统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2018. [15] 国家统计局. 中国环境统计年鉴2016[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2016. [16] 国家统计局. 国际统计年鉴2015[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2015. [17] 国家统计局. 国际统计年鉴2017[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2018. [18] 环境保护部. 关于印发《行政区域突发环境事件风险评估推荐方法》的通知: 环办应急〔2018〕9号[A/OL]. [2021-09-20]. https://www.mee.gov.cn/gkml/hbb/bgt/201802/t20180206_430931.htm. [19] 环境保护部. 关于印发《企业突发环境事件风险评估指南(试行)》的通知: 环办〔2014〕34号[A/OL]. (2014-04-03)[2021-09-20]. https://www.mee.gov.cn/gkml/hbb/bgt/201506/t20150629_304483.htm. [20] 毕军.新时期我国环境风险防控面临的多元化挑战[J]. 中国环境管理,2020,12(2):42-43.BI J. Diversified challenges faced by the prevention and control of environmental risk in China in the new era[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Management,2020,12(2):42-43. [21] 毕军, 杨洁, 李其亮. 区域环境风险分析和管理[M]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2006. [22] 曹国志, 於方, 王金南, 等.长江经济带突发环境事件风险防控现状、问题与对策[J]. 中国环境管理,2018,10(1):81-85.CAO G Z, YU F, WANG J N, et al. Situation, problems and countermeasures of risk prevention and control of environmental emergencies in the Yangtze River Economic Belt[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Management,2018,10(1):81-85. [23] 赵玉婷, 李亚飞, 董林艳, 等.长江经济带典型流域重化产业环境风险及对策[J]. 环境科学研究,2020,33(5):1247-1253.ZHAO Y T, LI Y F, DONG L Y, et al. Environmental risks and countermeasures of heavy chemical industry in the Yangtze River Economic Belt[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences,2020,33(5):1247-1253. [24] 工业园区污水处理研究报告(2021版)[R]. 北京: E20研究院水业研究中心, 2021. [25] 张厚明, 秦海林.长江经济带“重化工围江”问题研究[J]. 中国国情国力,2017(4):38-40. [26] 中国石油和化学工业联合会. 17家产值超千亿 2021化工园区30强/潜力10强公布[EB/OL]. (2021-06-04)[2021-09-20]. http://www.cpcif.org.cn/detail/6a6fac3d-fc2b-4cf3-82cc-3b1ba343c36f. [27] 张欣, 高欣悦, 邓启华, 等.基于联产耦合模型下化工园区循环经济模式的构建: 以四川为例[J]. 四川化工,2021,24(2):13-17. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4887.2021.02.005ZHANG X, GAO X Y, DENG Q H, et al. Construction of circular economy model in chemical industry park based on coupling model of co-production: take sichuan as an example[J]. Sichuan Chemical Industry,2021,24(2):13-17. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4887.2021.02.005 [28] 吴传清, 叶云岭.破解“化工围江”难题的“湖北样本”和“江苏样本”[J]. 西部论坛,2020,30(6):71-83. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8131.2020.06.007WU C Q, YE Y L. “Hubei Example” and “Jiangsu Example” for solving the problem of “Chemical Industry Encircling Yangtze River Economic Belt”[J]. West Forum,2020,30(6):71-83. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8131.2020.06.007 [29] 熊芬, 朱鹏.化工园区布局性环境风险及对策[J]. 化工管理,2021(14):38-39.XIONG F, ZHU P. On environmental risk of chemical industrial park layout and countermeasures[J]. Chemical Enterprise Management,2021(14):38-39. ⊗ -
下载:
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 276
- HTML全文浏览量: 186
- PDF下载量: 36
- 被引次数: 0
