The impact of land use change on ecosystem service value in karst mountain area
-
摘要:
研究土地利用变化与生态系统服务价值（ESV）的演变对优化喀斯特脆弱山区的土地资源配置和推进生态恢复具有重要意义。以贵州省瓮安县为例，利用2001年、2011年、2019年3期遥感影像数据，通过CA-Markov模型预测2027年土地利用格局，定量分析研究区2001—2027年土地利用和ESV的时空演变趋势。结果表明：瓮安县土地利用类型以林地和耕地为主，耕地向林地的转移较为剧烈，林地和建设用地面积持续增加，建设用地和水域的动态度最大；ESV总体呈上升趋势，耕地向林地转移是ESV增加的主要贡献项，ESV增加区域主要发生在瓮安县西部和东北部地区，未来ESV低值区仍分布在中部城镇地区；服务类型产生的ESV主要以土壤形成与保护服务为主，其次为水源涵养服务和生物多样性保护；林地和耕地是引起研究区ESV变化的敏感因子，研究区ESV对改进的价值系数缺乏弹性。研究期内瓮安县土地利用结构变化显著，生态系统服务价值明显提升。
-
关键词:
- 土地利用变化 /
- 生态系统服务价值(ESV) /
- 时空演变 /
- 敏感性分析 /
- 喀斯特山区
Abstract:The study of land use change and the evolution of ecosystem service value (ESV) is of great significance for optimizing the allocation of land resources in fragile karst mountainous areas and realizing ecological restoration. Taking Weng'an County in Guizhou Province as an example, the remote sensing image data from 2001, 2011, and 2019 were used to predict the land use pattern in 2027 through CA-Markov model, and quantitatively analyze the spatio-temporal evolution trend of land use and ESV in the study area from 2001 to 2027. The results showed that the land use types in Weng'an County were mainly forest land and arable land. The transfer of arable land to forest land was relatively intense. The area of forest land and construction land continued to increase, and the dynamic degree of construction land and water body was the largest; ESV was generally increasing, and the transfer of arable land to forest land was the main contributor to the increase of ESV. The increase of ESV mainly occurred in the western and northeastern regions. In the future, low ESV areas would still be distributed in the central urban areas; ESV generated by the service type was mainly based on soil formation and protection services, followed by water sources conservation service and biodiversity protection; forest land and cultivated land were sensitive factors that caused ESV changes in the study area, and ESV of the study area was inelastic to improve the value coefficient. During the study period, the land use structure of Weng'an County had changed significantly, and the ESV increased significantly.
-
图 5 瓮安县2001—2027年ESV空间分布
Figure 5. Spatial distribution map of ESV in Weng'an County from 2001 to 2027
图 6 瓮安县2001—2027年基于服务类型的ESV变化
注：图中数字为ESV，单位为亿元。
Figure 6. Changes of ESV based on service types in Weng'an County from 2001 to 2027
表 1 瓮安县土地利用类型ESV当量因子
Table 1. ESV coefficient of land use types in Weng'an County
元/hm2 服务类型 森林 草地 耕地 水域 未利用地 气体调节 4 506.19 1 029.99 643.74 0.00 0.00 气候调节 3 476.21 1 158.74 1 145.86 592.24 0.00 水源涵养 4 119.95 1 029.99 772.49 26 238.91 38.62 土壤形成与保护 5 021.19 2 510.59 1 879.73 12.87 25.75 废物处理 1 686.60 1 686.60 2 111.47 23 406.45 12.87 生物多样性保护 4 197.20 1 403.36 914.11 3 205.83 437.74 食物生产 128.75 386.25 1 287.48 128.75 12.87 原材料 3 347.46 64.37 128.75 12.87 0.00 娱乐文化 4 506.19 1 029.99 643.74 0.00 0.00 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 瓮安县2001—2027年各土地利用类型面积
Table 2. Area of various land use types in Weng'an County, 2001-2027
hm2 年份 草地 耕地 建设用地 林地 水域 未利用地 2001 6 070.05 108 194.04 2 293.65 78 806.79 710.01 433.98 2011 5 623.83 83 534.94 4 919.76 99 102.69 2 619.27 708.03 2019 4 058.89 61 332.07 7 904.22 119 704.48 3 187.38 321.47 2027 4 562.65 55 566.80 8 937.04 123 826.82 3 194.09 421.13
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 瓮安县2001—2027年土地利用动态度
Table 3. Dynamic degree of land use in Weng'an County from 2001 to 2027
% 时期 草地 耕地 建设用地 林地 水域 未利用地 2001—2011年 −0.74 −2.28 11.45 2.58 26.89 6.31 2011—2019年 −3.48 −3.32 7.58 2.60 2.71 −6.82 2019—2027年 1.55 −1.18 1.63 0.43 0.03 3.87 2001—2027年 −0.96 −1.87 11.14 2.20 13.46 −0.11
下载: 导出CSV
表 4 瓮安县2001—2027年不同土地利用类型ESV及占比
Table 4. ESV and proportion of different land use types in Weng'an County from 2001 to 2027
土地
利用
类型ESV/亿元 占比/% 2001年 2011年 2019年 2027年 2001年 2011年 2019年 2027年 林地 22.170 27.879 33.675 34.834 67.624 74.565 81.344 82.750 草地 0.566 0.524 0.378 0.425 1.726 1.402 0.914 1.010 耕地 9.625 7.432 5.456 4.944 29.361 19.877 13.180 11.743 水域 0.420 1.550 1.886 1.890 1.282 4.146 4.557 4.491 未利
用地0.002 0.004 0.002 0.002 0.007 0.010 0.004 0.005 合计 32.783 37.389 41.398 42.096 100 100 100 100
下载: 导出CSV
表 5 瓮安县2001—2027年敏感性系数
Table 5. Sensitivity coefficient of Weng'an County from 2001 to 2027
土地利用类型 2001年 2011年 2019年 2027年 森林 0.676 24 0.745 65 0.813 45 0.827 50 草地 0.017 26 0.014 02 0.009 14 0.010 10 耕地 0.293 61 0.198 77 0.131 80 0.117 43 水体 0.012 82 0.041 46 0.045 57 0.044 91 未利用地 0.000 07 0.000 10 0.000 04 0.000 05
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] COSTANZA R, de GROOT R, BRAAT L, et al. Twenty years of ecosystem services: how far have we come and how far do we still need to go[J]. Ecosystem Services,2017,28:1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.008 [2] ASSESMENT M E. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis[J]. Physics Teacher,2005,34(9):534-534. [3] 柳冬青, 张金茜, 巩杰, 等.陇中黄土丘陵区土地利用强度-生态系统服务-人类福祉时空关系研究: 以安定区为例[J]. 生态学报,2019,39(2):637-648.LIU D Q, ZHANG J X, GONG J, et al. Spatial and temporal relations among land-use intensity, ecosystem services, and human well-being in the Longzhong Loess Hilly Region: a case study of the Anding District, Gansu Province[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2019,39(2):637-648. [4] FELIPE-LUCIA M R, SOLIVERES S, PENONE C, et al. Land-use intensity alters networks between biodiversity, ecosystem functions, and services[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2020,117(45):28140-28149. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2016210117 [5] 傅伯杰, 张立伟.土地利用变化与生态系统服务: 概念、方法与进展[J]. 地理科学进展,2014,33(4):441-446. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.04.001FU B J, ZHANG L W. Land-use change and ecosystem services: concepts, methods and progress[J]. Progress in Geography,2014,33(4):441-446. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.04.001 [6] 郑华, 李屹峰, 欧阳志云, 等.生态系统服务功能管理研究进展[J]. 生态学报,2013,33(3):702-710. doi: 10.5846/stxb201205280786ZHENG H, LI Y F, OUYANG Z Y, et al. Progress and perspectives of ecosystem services management[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2013,33(3):702-710. doi: 10.5846/stxb201205280786 [7] 丁肇慰, 肖能文, 高晓奇, 等.长江流域2000—2015年生态系统质量及服务变化特征[J]. 环境科学研究,2020,33(5):1308-1314.DING Z W, XIAO N W, GAO X Q, et al. Changes of ecosystem quality and services between 2000 and 2015 in Yangtze River Basin[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences,2020,33(5):1308-1314. [8] 王晓东, 蒙吉军.土地利用变化的环境生态效应研究进展[J]. 北京大学学报(自然科学版),2014,50(6):1133-1140.WANG X D, MENG J J. Research progress on the environmental-ecological impacts of land use change[J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis,2014,50(6):1133-1140. [9] 张宇硕, 吴殿廷, 吕晓.土地利用/覆盖变化对生态系统服务的影响: 空间尺度视角的研究综述[J]. 自然资源学报,2020,35(5):1172-1189. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200513ZHANG Y S, WU D T, LÜ X. A review on the impact of land use/land cover change on ecosystem services from a spatial scale perspective[J]. Journal of Natural Resources,2020,35(5):1172-1189. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200513 [10] BENTON T, BAILEY R, FROGGATT A, et al. Designing sustainable landuse in a 1.5 ℃ world: the complexities of projecting multiple ecosystem services from land[J]. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability,2018,31:88-95. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2018.01.011 [11] 肖建设, 乔斌, 陈国茜, 等.黄河源区玛多县土地利用和生态系统服务价值的演变[J]. 生态学报,2020,40(2):510-521.XIAO J S, QIAO B, CHEN G Q, et al. Land use change and evolution of ecosystem service value in Maduo County of source region of the Yellow River[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2020,40(2):510-521. [12] VALBUENA D, VERBURG P H, BREGT A K. A method to define a typology for agent-based analysis in regional land-use research[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment,2008,128(1/2):27-36. [13] 吝静, 赵成义, 马晓飞, 等.基于生态系统服务价值的塔里木河干流土地利用结构优化[J]. 干旱区研究,2021,38(4):1140-1151. doi: 10.13866/j.azr.2021.04.26LIN J, ZHAO C Y, MA X F, et al. Optimization of land use structure based on ecosystem service value in the mainstream of Tarim River[J]. Arid Zone Research,2021,38(4):1140-1151. doi: 10.13866/j.azr.2021.04.26 [14] 戚丽萍, 闫丹丹, 李静泰, 等.江苏省生态系统服务价值对土地利用/土地覆盖变化的动态响应[J]. 北京师范大学学报(自然科学版),2021,57(2):255-264.QI L P, YAN D D, LI J T, et al. Dynamics of ecosystem services value in response to land use/land cover changes in Jiangsu Province[J]. Journal of Beijing Normal University (Natural Science),2021,57(2):255-264. [15] 何毅, 唐湘玲, 代俊峰.漓江流域生态系统服务价值最大化的土地利用结构优化[J]. 生态学报,2021,41(13):5214-5222.HE Y, TANG X L, DAI J F. Land-use structure optimization for the Lijiang River basin ecosystem service value maximization[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2021,41(13):5214-5222. [16] COSTANZA R, D'ARGE R, de GROOT R, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature,1997,387:253-260. doi: 10.1038/387253a0 [17] 谢高地, 鲁春霞, 冷允法, 等.青藏高原生态资产的价值评估[J]. 自然资源学报,2003,18(2):189-196. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-3037.2003.02.010XIE G D, LU C X, LENG Y F, et al. Ecological assets valuation of the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Journal of Natural Resources,2003,18(2):189-196. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-3037.2003.02.010 [18] 王宁, 杨光, 韩雪莹, 等.内蒙古1990—2018年土地利用变化及生态系统服务价值[J]. 水土保持学报,2020,34(5):244-250.WANG N, YANG G, HAN X Y, et al. Land use change and ecosystem service value in Inner Mongolia from 1990 to 2018[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,34(5):244-250. [19] 约日古丽·卡斯木, 杨胜天, 孜比布拉·司马义.新疆艾比湖流域土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的影响[J]. 农业工程学报,2019,35(2):260-269. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2019.02.033YUERIGULI K, YANG S T, ZIBIBULA S. Impact of land use change on ecosystem service value in Ebinur Lake Basin, Xinjiang[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2019,35(2):260-269. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2019.02.033 [20] 张钰莹, 孙美莹, 杨荣金, 等. 西南地区土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的影响[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2022, 12(1): 207-214.ZHANG Y Y, SUN M Y, YANG R J, et al. Impact of land-use change on ecosystem service value in Southwest China[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2022, 12(1): 207-214. [21] 左玲丽, 彭文甫, 陶帅, 等.岷江上游土地利用与生态系统服务价值的动态变化[J]. 生态学报,2021,41(16):6384-6397.ZUO L L, PENG W F, TAO S, et al. Dynamic changes of land use and ecosystem services value in the upper reaches of the Minjiang River[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2021,41(16):6384-6397. [22] 嵇航宇, 肖建武, 刘畅.基于土地利用变化的长沙市生态系统服务价值计量分析及趋势预测[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报(社会科学版),2021,15(2):34-44.JI H Y, XIAO J W, LIU C. Metrological analysis and trend prediction of ecosystem service value in Changsha based on land use change[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology (Social Sciences),2021,15(2):34-44. [23] 王永琪, 马姜明.基于县域尺度珠江-西江经济带广西段土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的影响研究[J]. 生态学报,2020,40(21):7826-7839.WANG Y Q, MA J M. Effects of land use change on ecosystem services value in Guangxi section of the Pearl River-West River Economic Belt at the County scale[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2020,40(21):7826-7839. [24] 王波, 杨太保.1980—2018年银川市生态系统服务价值评价及驱动力分析[J]. 干旱区地理,2021,44(2):552-564. doi: 10.12118/j.issn.10006060.2021.02.26WANG B, YANG T B. Value evaluation and driving force analysis of ecosystem services in Yinchuan City from 1980 to 2018[J]. Arid Land Geography,2021,44(2):552-564. doi: 10.12118/j.issn.10006060.2021.02.26 [25] 裴宏伟, 张红娟, 张良, 等. 清水河流域生态系统服务评估及预测[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2022, 12(5): 1466-1473.PEI H W, ZHANG H J, ZHANG L, et al. Assessment and prediction of ecosystem services in the Qingshui River Basin[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2022, 12(5): 1466-1473. [26] 唐启琳, 刘方, 刘秀明, 等.基于LUCC的喀斯特山区生态系统服务价值评价[J]. 环境科学与技术,2019,42(1):170-177.TANG Q L, LIU F, LIU X M, et al. Evaluation of ecosystem service value in Karst mountains based on land use change[J]. Environmental Science & Technology,2019,42(1):170-177. [27] 王权, 李阳兵, 黄娟, 等.喀斯特槽谷区土地利用转型过程对生态系统服务价值的影响[J]. 水土保持研究,2019,26(3):192-198.WANG Q A, LI Y B, HUANG J, et al. Effect of land use transformation process on ecosystem service value in Karst trough valley area[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,26(3):192-198. [28] 韩会庆, 苏志华.喀斯特生态系统服务研究进展与展望[J]. 中国岩溶,2017,36(3):352-358. doi: 10.11932/karst20170309HAN H Q, SU Z H. Research progress and prospects of Karst ecosystem services[J]. Carsologica Sinica,2017,36(3):352-358. doi: 10.11932/karst20170309 [29] 吴清林, 梁虹, 熊康宁, 等.喀斯特地区水土漏失监测方法评述[J]. 贵州师范大学学报(自然科学版),2020,38(3):30-38.WU Q L, LIANG H, XIONG K N, et al. Reviews of soil leakage loss monitoring in Karst areas[J]. Journal of Guizhou Normal University (Natural Sciences),2020,38(3):30-38. [30] 樊祖洪, 熊康宁, 李亮, 郭琼琼. 喀斯特生态脆弱区农业生态经济系统耦合协调发展研究: 以贵州省为例[J/OL]. 长江流域资源与环境. [2021-09-10]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/42.1320.X.20210425.1539.002.html. [31] 刘纯军, 周国富, 黄启芬, 等.基于地形梯度的贵州乌江流域土地利用时空演变分析[J]. 贵州师范大学学报(自然科学版),2020,38(6):45-54. doi: 10.16614/j.gznuj.zrb.2020.06.007LIU C J, ZHOU G F, HUANG Q F, et al. Spatial-temporal evolution of land use in Wujiang River Basin in Guizhou Province based on the terrain gradient[J]. Journal of Guizhou Normal University (Natural Sciences),2020,38(6):45-54. doi: 10.16614/j.gznuj.zrb.2020.06.007 [32] 高奇, 师学义, 黄勤, 等.区域土地利用变化的生态系统服务价值响应[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2013,23(增刊 2):308-312.GAO Q, SHI X Y, HUANG Q, et al. Ecosystem service value respond to regional land use change[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment,2013,23(Suppl 2):308-312. [33] 吴琳娜, 杨胜天, 刘晓燕, 等.1976年以来北洛河流域土地利用变化对人类活动程度的响应[J]. 地理学报,2014,69(1):54-63. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201401005WU L N, YANG S T, LIU X Y, et al. Response analysis of land use change to the degree of human activities in Beiluo River Basin since 1976[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica,2014,69(1):54-63. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201401005 [34] 熊侣英, 师学义.黄土山丘区土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的影响: 以长河流域为例[J]. 水土保持研究,2018,25(2):335-340.XIONG L Y, SHI X Y. Effects of land use change on ecosystem service value in the loess hilly area: a case study of the Changhe River Basin[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(2):335-340. [35] 秦艳丽, 时鹏, 何文虹, 等.西安市城市化对景观格局及生态系统服务价值的影响[J]. 生态学报,2020,40(22):8239-8250.QIN Y L, SHI P, HE W H, et al. Influence of urbanization on landscape pattern and ecosystem service value in Xi'an City[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2020,40(22):8239-8250. [36] 褚琳, 张欣然, 王天巍, 等.基于CA-Markov和InVEST模型的城市景观格局与生境质量时空演变及预测[J]. 应用生态学报,2018,29(12):4106-4118.CHU L, ZHANG X R, WANG T W, et al. Spatial-temporal evolution and prediction of urban landscape pattern and habitat quality based on CA-Markov and InVEST model[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2018,29(12):4106-4118. □ -
下载:
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 323
- HTML全文浏览量: 199
- PDF下载量: 49
- 被引次数: 0
