河流入海口潮间带某工业地块石油烃污染特征及迁移规律

张荣海; 陈余道; 韦壮绵; 谢湉; 李书迪; 欧丽

doi:10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210449

河流入海口潮间带某工业地块石油烃污染特征及迁移规律

doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210449

张荣海^{1, 2,},
陈余道^1, ,,
韦壮绵²,
谢湉^{2, 3},
李书迪²,
欧丽²

1.
桂林理工大学环境科学与工程学院
2.
广西博世科环保科技股份有限公司
3.
华南理工大学环境与能源学院

基金项目: 国家重点研发计划项目（2020YFC1807104）；广西重点研发计划项目（桂科AB18281002）

详细信息

作者简介:
张荣海（1985—），男，博士研究生，研究方向为土壤及地下水调查和修复，443749544@qq.com

通讯作者:
陈余道（1965—），男，教授，博士，研究方向为污染水文地质学，cyd0056@vip.sina.com

中图分类号: X53,X523
计量
- 文章访问数: 230
- HTML全文浏览量: 123
- PDF下载量: 20
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-08-23

Pollution characteristics and migration law of petroleum hydrocarbons in an industrial site in the intertidal zone of the river estuary

ZHANG Ronghai^{1, 2
,},
CHEN Yudao^{1
, ,},
WEI Zhuangmian²,
XIE Tian^{2, 3},
LI Shudi²,
OU Li²

1.
School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guilin University of Technology
2.
Guangxi Bossco Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.
3.
School of Environment and Energy, South China University of Technology

摘要

摘要:
以河流入海口潮间带某工业地块为研究对象，采集和分析土壤及地下水样品中的石油烃（TPH），探究TPH在潮间带工业地块土壤和地下水中的迁移规律及潮汐作用的影响。结果表明：地块沿江区域地下水位受潮汐作用影响波动明显，含水层渗透系数平均为1.40 m/d，且近江区域含水层渗透性较好；地块土壤TPH最大超标倍数为1.39倍，污染主要分布于核心生产区，主要赋存于第一个2个不同岩性层间的交界处附近，地层结构和潮汐效应对土壤TPH垂向分布作用明显，当水位下降时TPH向下迁移，部分残留在包气带中，水位上升则导致相反的过程；地块地下水TPH最大超标倍数为95.23倍，污染羽中心与土壤TPH污染主要区域一致，地下水流场对污染物迁移分布影响显著；潮汐效应使得TPH污染羽的范围扩大，地下水水位波动和无长期稳定流向使得TPH在土壤和地下水之间发生数次的重新分配，导致其迁移规律不明显。本研究在一定程度上揭示了潮汐效应引起的潮间带地下水位长期波动对污染物在土壤和地下水中的迁移规律产生的显著影响，可为类似污染地块的有效管控和修复治理提供科学指导。
- 河流入海口潮间带 /
- 土壤 /
- 地下水 /
- 潮汐效应 /
- 石油烃 /
- 迁移规律
Abstract:
Taking an industrial site in the intertidal zone of the river estuary as the research object, the total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPHs) of soil and groundwater samples were collected and investigated, and the migration law of TPHs in the soil and groundwater of the industrial site in the intertidal zone and the influence of tide on it were analyzed and discussed. The results showed that the groundwater level in the area along the river of the site fluctuated obviously by tide, the average permeability coefficient of the aquifer was 1.40 m/d, and the permeability of aquifer near the river was better. The maximum exceeding multiple of TPHs in the soil of the site was 1.39 times. The pollution was mainly distributed in the core production area, mainly neared the junction between the first two different lithological layers. The vertical distribution of TPHs in soil was significantly influenced by stratum structure and tidal effect. When the water level decreased, TPHs migrated downward and part of TPHs remained in vadose zone, while when the water level rose, it led to the opposite process. The maximum exceeding multiple of TPHs in the groundwater of the site was 95.23 times, the pollution plume center was consistent with the main areas of soil TPHs pollution, and the groundwater flow field had a significant impact on the migration and distribution of pollutants. The tidal effect expanded the range of TPH pollution plume. The fluctuation of groundwater level with no long-term stable flow direction made TPHs redistribute countless times between soil and groundwater, so that its migration law was not obvious. This study revealed to a certain extent that the long-term fluctuation of the intertidal groundwater level caused by the tidal effect had a significant impact on the migration law of pollutants in the soil and groundwater, which could provide a scientific guidance for the effective control and restoration of similar contaminated sites
- river estuary intertidal zone /
- soil /
- groundwater /
- tidal effect /
- petroleum hydrocarbons /
- migration law

HTML全文

图 1 采样点位布设

Figure 1. Distribution of sampling points

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 潮汐水位及监测井水位变化

Figure 2. Tidal water level and monitoring well water level fluctuation

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 土壤pH、含水率和TPH浓度地层分布

Figure 3. Stratigraphic distribution of pH, water content and TPH concentration in the soil

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 土壤TPH浓度空间分布

Figure 4. Spatial distribution of TPH content in the soil

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 石油烃在不同土壤剖面中的垂直分布

Figure 5. Vertical distribution of TPHs in different soil profiles

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 地下水TPH浓度水平分布

Figure 6. Horizontal distribution of TPHs concentration in the groundwater

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 水文监测点信息

Table 1. Information of hydrological monitoring points

监测点	与江岸距离（x）/m	平面位置	监测含水层	监测时间
Z38	185	五金集中厂内东北角	淤泥质夹薄层粉砂层	05:00—08:00， 11:00—13:00， 18:00—23:00
Z23	350	五金集中厂内西南角
Z21	410	研究区内（未属生产区）
Z3	610	皮革集中厂区内
潮汐水位		某江的江堤边

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 监测井含水层参数计算结果

Table 2. Results of aquifer parameter of monitoring wells

监测井编号	x/m	H_x/m	H₀/m	t₀/min	a/(m²/min)	含水层厚/m	μ_e	K/(m/d)
Z38	185	0.62	2.12	759	93.72	6.6	0.000 1	2.04
Z23	350	0.46			60.68	6.4		1.36
Z21	410	0.45			58.97	6.3		1.34
Z3	610	0.22			27.60	4.6		0.87

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(31)

[1]	孙明波, 何庆生, 刘献玲, 等.石油化工污染土壤回转窑式热解吸修复技术探讨[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2017,7(5):594-599. SUN M B, HE Q S, LIU X L, et al. Discussion on thermal desorption remediation technology with rotary kiln for petrochemical contaminated soil[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2017,7(5):594-599.
[2]	HEATH J S, KOBLIS K, SAGER S L. Review of chemical, physical, and toxicologic properties of components of total petroleum hydrocarbons[J]. Journal of Soil Contamination,1993,2(1):1-25.
[3]	张丹, 姜林, 夏天翔, 等.土壤-地下水系统中石油烃的迁移和生物降解述评[J]. 环境工程,2015,33(7):1-6. ZHANG D, JIANG L, XIA T X, et al. The migration and biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbons in soils-groundwater system: a review[J]. Environmental Engineering,2015,33(7):1-6.
[4]	薛镇坤, 左锐, 王金生, 等.石油类污染物在非均质包气带中的迁移规律研究[J]. 环境科学研究,2020,33(4):1028-1036. XUE Z K, ZUO R, WANG J S, et al. Migration of petroleum in strong heterogeneous vadose zones[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences,2020,33(4):1028-1036.
[5]	GAO C, GUO X J, SHAO S, et al. Using MODFLOW/MT3DMS and electrical resistivity tomography to characterize organic pollutant migration in clay soil layer with a shallow water table[J]. Environmental Technology,2021,42(28):4490-4499. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2020.1767699
[6]	王玉蕊, 陈启华, 唐丽丽, 等.加油站地下水苯系物迁移模拟研究[J]. 天津科技,2017,44(3):81-85. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8945.2017.03.024 WANG Y R, CHEN Q H, TANG L L, et al. Transfer of benzene series in groundwater around a gas station: a simulation sudy[J]. Tianjin Science & Technology,2017,44(3):81-85. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8945.2017.03.024
[7]	张宏凯, 左锐, 王金生, 等.加油站泄漏污染物的迁移分布规律[J]. 中国环境科学,2018,38(4):1532-1539. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2018.04.041 ZHANG H K, ZUO R, WANG J S, et al. The underground migration and distribution of petroleum contamination at a gas station[J]. China Environmental Science,2018,38(4):1532-1539. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2018.04.041
[8]	TENG Y G, FENG D, SONG L T, et al. Total petroleum hydrocarbon distribution in soils and groundwater in Songyuan oilfield, Northeast China[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,2013,185(11):9559-9569. doi: 10.1007/s10661-013-3274-4
[9]	慕山, 许端平, 陈洪, 等.大庆贴不贴泡周边土壤及地下水石油烃污染规律[J]. 环境科学研究,2006,19(2):16-19. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-6929.2006.02.007 MU S, XU D P, CHEN H, et al. Contamination of petroleum hydrocarbons in soils and groundwater around tiebutie pool in Daqing[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences,2006,19(2):16-19. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-6929.2006.02.007
[10]	HEISS J W, MICHAEL H A, PULEO J. Groundwater–surface water exchange in the intertidal zone detected by hydrologic and coastal oceanographic measurements[J]. Hydrological Processes,2020,34(17):3718-3721. doi: 10.1002/hyp.13825
[11]	李海龙, 万力, 焦赳赳.海岸带水文地质学研究中的几个热点问题[J]. 地球科学进展,2011,26(7):685-694. LI H L, WAN L, JIAO J J. Hot issues in the study of coastal hydrogeology[J]. Advances in Earth Science,2011,26(7):685-694.
[12]	阳玲. 在滨海区含水层系统中地下水对潮汐的响应[D]. 天津: 天津师范大学, 2020.
[13]	刘艳. 海潮引起的滨海地区地下水位波动的研究[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2016.
[14]	王礼恒, 李国敏, 董艳辉, 等.利用观测孔中地下水位潮汐效应计算天津滨海新区含水层参数[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2012,39(4):7-11,37. WANG L H, LI G M, DONG Y H, et al. Estimation of shallow aquifer parameters using groundwater level tidal fluctuations at two boreholes in a coastal aquifer[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2012,39(4):7-11,37.
[15]	ZHOU X. Determination of aquifer parameters based on measurements of tidal effects on a coastal aquifer near Beihai, China[J]. Hydrological Processes,2008,22(16):3176-3180. doi: 10.1002/hyp.6906
[16]	WU M L, LI W, DICK W A, et al. Bioremediation of hydrocarbon degradation in a petroleum-contaminated soil and microbial population and activity determination[J]. Chemosphere,2017,169:124-130. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.11.059
[17]	生态环境部, 国家市场监督管理总局. 土壤环境质量建设用地土壤污染风险管控标准: GB 36600—2018[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2018.
[18]	王兵, 李珍珍, 李琋, 等.页岩气井场土壤石油类污染特性及对理化性质的影响[J]. 安全与环境学报,2018,18(4):1598-1604. WANG B, LI Z Z, LI X, et al. On the contamination features and their relationship with the physicochemical properties of petroleum hydrocarbon polluted soils in the shalegas fields[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment,2018,18(4):1598-1604.
[19]	ZHANG Q, WANG G C, SUGIURA N, et al. Distribution of petroleum hydrocarbons in soils and the underlying unsaturated subsurface at an abandoned petrochemical site, North China[J]. Hydrological Processes,2014,28(4):2185-2191. doi: 10.1002/hyp.9770
[20]	陈捷. 石油烃组分在土壤和地下水环境中的分布规律与迁移特征研究[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2018.
[21]	林广宇. 地下水位变动带石油烃污染物的迁移转化规律研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2014.
[22]	LAMICHHANE S, BAL KRISHNA K C, SARUKKALIGE R. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) removal by sorption: a review[J]. Chemosphere,2016,148:336-353. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.01.036
[23]	郑昭贤, 苏小四, 王威.东北某油田污染场地土壤总石油烃背景值的确定及污染特征[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2011,38(6):118-124. ZHENG Z X, SU X S, WANG W. Estimation of the background(threshold) total petroleum hydrocarbon concentration and analysis of the characteristics of petroleum hydrocarbon contamination in a certain oilfield in Northeast China[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2011,38(6):118-124.
[24]	苏丽娜, 马晓利, 陈平.含油污水灌区土壤污染特征研究[J]. 土壤通报,2018,49(2):478-485. doi: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2018.02.31 SU L N, MA X L, CHEN P. Soil properties and pollution status in oily sewage irrigation area[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science,2018,49(2):478-485. doi: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2018.02.31
[25]	常颖. 沿海石化行业典型地下水污染数值模拟研究[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2014.
[26]	张倩. 典型石油污染场地有机污染物分布特征及其影响因素分析[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2009.
[27]	上海市生态环境局.上海市建设用地土壤污染状况调查、风险评估、风险管控与修复方案编制、风险管控与修复效果评估工作的补充规定(试行)[S].上海,上海市生态环境局, 2020.
[28]	王超月. 潮汐和海浪引起的海岸带含水层地下水动态研究[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2016.
[29]	杨明星, 杨悦锁, 杜新强, 等.石油污染地下水有机污染组分特征及其环境指示效应[J]. 中国环境科学,2013,33(6):1025-1032. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2013.06.010 YANG M X, YANG Y S, DU X Q, et al. Organic fractions and their environmental implications of petroleum contaminated groundwater[J]. China Environmental Science,2013,33(6):1025-1032. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2013.06.010
[30]	徐瑞阳, 洪梅.地下水水位波动对石油污染物迁移及透镜体位置的影响[J]. 环境工程,2020,38(12):168-172. XU R Y, HONG M. Effect of water-table fluctuation on petroleum pollutant migration and lens position[J]. Environmental Engineering,2020,38(12):168-172.
[31]	刘月峤, 丁爱中, 刘宝蕴, 等.地下水位波动带中石油烃污染迁移转化规律综述[J]. 科学技术与工程,2018,18(24):172-178. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2018.24.025 LIU Y Q, DING A Z, LIU B Y, et al. A review of the petroleum hydrocarbon contamination transformation performance in the zone of intermittent saturation[J]. Science Technology and Engineering,2018,18(24):172-178. ⊕ doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2018.24.025