留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

柔性垂直防渗技术膨润土-黏土密封材料防渗性能研究

董洋 张文 李大伟 姚兰 初文磊 王海东 殷晓东

董洋,张文,李大伟,等.柔性垂直防渗技术膨润土-黏土密封材料防渗性能研究[J].环境工程技术学报,2022,12(3):824-833 doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210286
引用本文: 董洋,张文,李大伟,等.柔性垂直防渗技术膨润土-黏土密封材料防渗性能研究[J].环境工程技术学报,2022,12(3):824-833 doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210286
DONG Y,ZHANG W,LI D W,et al.Research on the impermeability of the bentonite-clay sealing materials in the flexible vertical impermeability technology[J].Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2022,12(3):824-833 doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210286
Citation: DONG Y,ZHANG W,LI D W,et al.Research on the impermeability of the bentonite-clay sealing materials in the flexible vertical impermeability technology[J].Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2022,12(3):824-833 doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210286

柔性垂直防渗技术膨润土-黏土密封材料防渗性能研究

doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210286
详细信息
    作者简介:

    董洋(1992—),女,工程师,硕士,主要从事污染场地修复与控制研究,dongy0825@163.com

    通讯作者:

    张文(1985—),女,高级工程师,博士,主要从事污染场地修复与风险管控研究,zhangwen@bjdshj.net

  • 中图分类号: X53

Research on the impermeability of the bentonite-clay sealing materials in the flexible vertical impermeability technology

  • 摘要:

    以长沙某厂区内天然黏土为主要原料,采用水溶液聚合法,在室温条件下,通过聚丙烯酰胺改性膨润土与黏土混合,制备密封材料,用于柔性垂直防渗墙建设工程底部区域密封,以防止地下水从高密度聚乙烯(HDPE)土工膜底绕流。通过室内试验研究3种不同改性剂以及膨润土添加量对密封材料渗透系数的影响以及密封材料对六价铬的阻滞吸附作用。结果表明:聚丙烯酰胺改性膨润土能够减小密封材料的渗透系数,而羟丙基甲基纤维和聚乙烯醇在一定程度上导致密封材料渗透系数增大;随着改性膨润土掺入量的增加,密封材料的渗透系数逐渐减小。在模拟柱迁移试验中,密封材料对污染物的截留率可达68.5%。基于长沙某柔性垂直防渗墙工程,对建成防渗墙区域进行示踪剂弥散迁移试验,在下游接收井中均未检测到示踪剂,说明该密封材料在工程应用上能有效防止底部地下水绕流。

     

  • 图  1  砂柱试验装置示意

    Figure  1.  Schematic diagram of sand column experimental device

    图  2  监测井布设点位

    Figure  2.  Setting points of the monitoring well

    图  3  3种聚合物对密封材料渗透系数的影响

    注:T1为不掺入膨润土;T2为掺入5%PAM改性膨润土;T3为掺入5%HPMC改性膨润土;T4为掺入5%PVA改性膨润土。

    Figure  3.  Effect of three kinds of macromolecular compound on the permeability coefficient of sealing materials

    图  4  膨润土掺入量对密封材料渗透性的影响

    Figure  4.  Effect of bentonite amount on the permeability of sealing materials

    图  5  六价铬在模拟柱中的穿透曲线

    Figure  5.  Penetration curve of hexavalent chromium in the simulated column

    图  6  模拟柱中各物质层对六价铬截留情况

    Figure  6.  Interception of hexavalent chromium by each material layer in the simulated column

    图  7  黏土微观结构[33]

    Figure  7.  Microstructure of the clay

    图  8  膨润土微观结构[33]

    Figure  8.  Microstructure of the bentonite

    图  9  对照区监测井内地下水电导率变化

    Figure  9.  Conductivity variation of groundwater in monitoring wells in the control area

    图  10  试验区B1和B2监测井内地下水水位和电导率变化

    Figure  10.  Variation of water level and conductivity of groundwater in monitoring wells B1 and B2 in the test area

    图  11  试验区C1和C2监测井内地下水水位和电导率变化

    Figure  11.  Variation of water level and conductivity of groundwater in monitoring wells C1 and C2 in the test area

    图  12  试验区D1和D2监测井内地下水水位和电导率变化

    Figure  12.  Variation of water level and conductivity of groundwater in monitoring wells D1 and D2 in the test area

    表  1  黏土土样粒径占比

    Table  1.   Particle analysis of the clay %

    粒径/mm塑性指数
    0.075~0.250.05~0.0750.01~0.050.005~0.01<0.005
    3.73.554.14.734.029.9
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  钠基膨润土性质

    Table  2.   Properties of sodium bentonite

    蒙脱石
    占比/%
    含水量/
    %
    滤失量/
    mL
    黏度计600 r/min
    读数
    −75 μm湿筛
    余量/%
    60.09.514.0222.6
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  模拟柱配置参数

    Table  3.   Configuration parameters of the simulation column

    模拟柱
    规格
    填充介质
    孔隙度/
    %
    渗透系数/
    (cm/s)
    六价铬浓度/
    (mg/L)
    长15 cm,
    内径5 cm
    上下层中砂(粒径0.25~0.5 mm)各5 cm,
    中层密封材料5 cm
    30≤1.0×10−7100
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  监测井参数

    Table  4.   Parameters of monitoring wells

    区域编号类别开孔深度/m
    对照区A1/A2注入井/接收井20~40
    A3/A4注入井/接收井10~20
    试验区B1/B2注入井/接收井10~20
    C1/C2注入井/接收井10~20
    D1/D2注入井/接收井20~40
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  5  监测井各指标背景值

    Table  5.   Background value of various indicators in monitoring wells

    监测井pH色度浊度/NTU总硬度/(mg/L)电导率/(mS/cm)硫酸盐浓度/(mg/L)六价铬浓度/(mg/L)总铬浓度/(mg/L)
    A17.41153.91690.86555.5<0.004<0.03
    A210.931531.21653.08039.6<0.0040.20
    A36.97150.51550.822251<0.004<0.03
    A46.071510.11020.27526.9<0.004<0.03
    B17.641038.11844.82042.2<0.004<0.03
    B27.45154.91470.574105<0.004<0.03
    C16.3658.11430.42551.0<0.004<0.03
    C25.73104.186.30.34480.2<0.004<0.03
    D16.811510.11331.060162<0.004<0.03
    D26.44106.31200.704164<0.004<0.03
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 伍斌, 王斌, 谷庆宝. 我国土壤环境标准体系建设研究[C]//重庆: 2019年中国土壤学会土壤环境专业委员会、土壤化学专业委员会联合学术研讨会论文集, 2019: 158-159.
    [2] SCHIRMER C M, HWANG S W, RIESENBURGER R I, et al. Obliteration of a metameric spinal arteriovenous malformation (Cobb syndrome) using combined endovascular embolization and surgical excision[J]. Journal of Neurosurgery Pediatrics,2012,10(1):44-49. doi: 10.3171/2012.3.PEDS11530
    [3] 孙兴凯, 黄海, 王海东, 等.大型污染场地修复过程中的问题探讨与工程实践[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2020,10(5):883-890. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20190216

    SUN X K, HUANG H, WANG H D, et al. Discussion of problems in the process of large-scale contaminate sites remediation and project practice[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2020,10(5):883-890. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20190216
    [4] 能昌信, 杨健, 徐亚, 等.填埋场渗漏条件下的自然电位响应特征及影响机制[J]. 环境科学研究,2021,34(12):2970-2979.

    NAI C X, YANG J, XU Y, et al. Response characteristics and influence mechanism of self-potential under landfills leakage[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences,2021,34(12):2970-2979.
    [5] 谢云峰, 曹云者, 张大定, 等.污染场地环境风险的工程控制技术及其应用[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2012,2(1):51-59. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-991X.2012.01.009

    XIE Y F, CAO Y Z, ZHANG D D, et al. Engineering control technologies and its application in the risk management for contaminated sites[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2012,2(1):51-59. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-991X.2012.01.009
    [6] US EPA. A citizen′s guide to vertical engineered barriers[M/OL]. [2021-05-10]. www.epa.gov/superfund/sites.
    [7] 靖向党, 阮文军, 代国忠.垃圾填埋场防渗技术的现状[J]. 长春工程学院学报(自然科学版),2006,7(1):1-4.

    JING X D, RUAN W J, DAI G Z, et al. Present state of antiseepage techniques used in waste landfill sites[J]. Journal of Changchun Institute of Technology (Natural Sciences Edition),2006,7(1):1-4.
    [8] 黄琴琴, 刘国, 文梅燕, 等.粉煤灰-膨润土阻隔墙控制地下水中镉污染[J]. 环境工程学报,2019,13(3):652-663. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201808136

    HUANG Q Q, LIU G, WEN M Y, et al. Controlling cadmium pollution with fly ash-bentonite cut-off wall[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering,2019,13(3):652-663. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201808136
    [9] 甄胜利, 霍成立, 贺真, 等.垂直阻隔技术的应用与对比研究[J]. 环境卫生工程,2017,25(1):51-56. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-8206.2017.01.014

    ZHEN S L, HUO C L, HE Z, et al. Application and comparison of vertical barrier technology[J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering,2017,25(1):51-56. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-8206.2017.01.014
    [10] 徐浩青, 周爱兆, 姜朋明, 等. 不同砂-膨润土垂直防渗墙填筑土料的掺量研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(增刊 1): 424-430.

    XU H Q, ZHOU A Z, JIANG P M, et al. Study on bentonite content of different sand-bentonite vertical cutoff wall backfill materials[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(Suppl 1): 424-430.
    [11] 张新钰, 辛宝东, 王晓红, 等.我国地下水污染研究进展[J]. 地球与环境,2011,39(3):415-422.

    ZHANG X Y, XIN B D, WANG X H, et al. Progress in research on groundwater pollution in our country[J]. Earth and Environment,2011,39(3):415-422.
    [12] 龚锐, 叶长文, 程蓉, 等.改性土-膨润土阻隔墙阻控离子型稀土矿氨氮污染[J]. 环境工程学报,2020,14(5):1394-1403. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201910045

    GONG R, YE C W, CHENG R, et al. Resistance and control of ammonia nitrogen pollution of ionic rare earth ores with modified soil-bentonite barrier[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering,2020,14(5):1394-1403. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201910045
    [13] 徐超, 黄亮, 邢皓枫.水泥-膨润土泥浆配比对防渗墙渗透性能的影响[J]. 岩土力学,2010,31(2):422-426. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2010.02.016

    XU C, HUANG L, XING H F. Influence of cement-bentonite slurry mixing ratio on permeability of cutoff wall[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2010,31(2):422-426. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2010.02.016
    [14] 刘香玉, 孙娟, 赵朝成, 等.CTAB改性膨润土制备及其对海洋溢油的吸附性能[J]. 环境工程学报,2019,13(1):68-78. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201808021

    LIU X Y, SUN J, ZHAO C C, et al. Preparation of CTAB modified bentonites and its adsorption properties of marine oil spill[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering,2019,13(1):68-78. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201808021
    [15] 范日东, 杜延军, 刘松玉, 等.无机盐溶液作用下砂-膨润土竖向隔离屏障材料化学相容性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学,2020,41(3):736-746.

    FAN R D, DU Y J, LIU S Y, et al. Experimental study on chemical compatibility of sand-bentonite backfills for vertical cutoff barrier permeated with inorganic salt solutions[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2020,41(3):736-746.
    [16] 杨玉玲. 六偏磷酸钠改良钙基膨润土系竖向隔离墙防渗控污性能研究[D]. 南京: 东南大学, 2017.
    [17] SAMPLE-LORD K M, AHMED M, MALUSIS M A. Diffusion through soil-bentonite backfill from a constructed vertical cutoff wall[J]. Soils and Foundations,2021,61(2):429-443. doi: 10.1016/j.sandf.2021.01.002
    [18] WASILKOWSKI D, NOWAK A, MICHALSKA J, et al. Ecological restoration of heavy metal-contaminated soil using Na-bentonite and green compost coupled with the cultivation of the grass Festuca arundinacea[J]. Ecological Engineering,2019,138:420-433. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2019.08.004
    [19] 傅贤雷, 张润, 万勇, 等. 改性土-膨润土阻隔屏障化学渗透膜效应研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2020, 42(增刊1): 172-176.

    FU X L, ZHANG R, WAN Y, et al. Chemico-osmotic membrane behaviors of amended soil-bentonite vertical barrier[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 42(Suppl 1): 172-176.
    [20] BAE S, INYANG H I. Confirmation of aqueous polymer sorption on contaminant barrier clay using TGA[J]. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering,2006,18(2):307-310. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2006)18:2(307)
    [21] DANIELS J L, INYANG H I. Contaminant barrier material textural response to interaction with aqueous polymers[J]. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering,2004,16(3):265-275. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2004)16:3(265)
    [22] 桑志伟. 粉煤灰改性粘土防渗层的性能研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2012.
    [23] 董洋, 张文, 张猛, 等. 一种粘土基防渗复合材料及其制备方法: CN112573864A[P]. 2021-03-30.
    [24] 叶为民, 刘樟荣, 崔玉军, 等.膨润土膨胀力时程曲线的形态特征及其模拟[J]. 岩土工程学报,2020,42(1):29-36.

    YE W M, LIU Z R, CUI Y J, et al. Features and modelling of time-evolution curves of swelling pressure of bentonite[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2020,42(1):29-36.
    [25] 盛炎民, 李书进, 代国忠.基于聚乙烯醇改性的隔离墙浆材渗透性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报,2018,37(12):4050-4055.

    SHENG Y M, LI S J, DAI G Z. Permeability of cutoff walls slurry based on modification of polyvinyl alcohol[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society,2018,37(12):4050-4055.
    [26] 张春华, 吴家葳, 陈赟, 等.基于污染物击穿时间的填埋场复合衬垫厚度简化设计方法[J]. 岩土工程学报,2020,42(10):1841-1848.

    ZHANG C H, WU J W, CHEN Y, et al. Simplified method for determination of thickness of composite liners based on contaminant breakthrough time[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2020,42(10):1841-1848.
    [27] 刘国, 徐丽莎, 李知可, 等.羟基磷灰石/膨润土复合材料对水中Cd2+吸附研究[J]. 硅酸盐学报,2018,46(10):1414-1425.

    LIU G, XU L S, LI Z K, et al. Adsorption of cadmium on hydroxyapatite/bentonite composites in aqueous solution[J]. Journal of the Chinese Ceramic Society,2018,46(10):1414-1425.
    [28] 潘倩, 陈云敏, 李育超, 等.膨润土泥饼渗透系数及对隔离墙渗透性的影响分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版),2017,51(2):231-237. doi: 10.3785/j.issn.1008973X.2017.02.002

    PAN Q, CHEN Y M, LI Y C, et al. Hydraulic conductivity of bentonite filter cake and its impact on permeability of cutoff walls[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science),2017,51(2):231-237. doi: 10.3785/j.issn.1008973X.2017.02.002
    [29] 周健, 陆志勇, 贾敏才.膨润土改性天然粘土渗透性的试验研究[J]. 岩土工程界,2008,11(12):45-47.
    [30] 刘阳生, 白庆中.膨润土改性天然粘土防渗材料的研究[J]. 应用基础与工程科学学报,2002,10(2):143-149. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-0930.2002.02.006

    LIU Y S, BAI Q Z. Study on bentonite enhanced soil as landfill materials[J]. Journal of Basic Science and Engineering,2002,10(2):143-149. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-0930.2002.02.006
    [31] 彭秀达, 刘红, 秦雄, 等.十六烷基三甲基溴化铵对膨润土负载纳米铁去除水中铬(Ⅵ)的增强作用[J]. 硅酸盐学报,2014,42(4):514-521. doi: 10.7521/j.issn.0454-5648.2014.04.15

    PENG X D, LIU H, QIN X, et al. Removal of chromium (Ⅵ) using zero-valent nanoscale iron supported on bentonite enhanced by cetyl-trimethyl ammonium bromide[J]. Journal of the Chinese Ceramic Society,2014,42(4):514-521. doi: 10.7521/j.issn.0454-5648.2014.04.15
    [32] 刘学贵. 新型聚丙烯酰胺改性膨润土防渗材料的研究[D]. 沈阳: 东北大学, 2010. University, 2010.
    [33] BUSSCHER W. Fundamentals of soil behavior[J]. Soil Science,1994,158(1):74. doi: 10.1097/00010694-199407000-00009
    [34] LI Y C, TONG X, CHEN Y, et al. Non-monotonic piezocone dissipation curves of backfills in a soil-bentonite slurry trench cutoff wall[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University:Science A,2018,19(4):277-288. doi: 10.1631/jzus.A1700097
    [35] TAN Y, ZHANG H Y, ZHANG T W, et al. Anisotropic hydro-mechanical behavior of full-scale compacted bentonite-sand blocks[J]. Engineering Geology,2021,287:106093. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106093
    [36] XIANG G S, LÜ L Y, GE L. Simple method for evaluating swelling of GMZ01 Na-bentonite affected by temperature at osmotic swelling[J]. Soils and Foundations,2020,60(5):1312-1321. doi: 10.1016/j.sandf.2020.09.003
    [37] LI M J, FANG H Y, DU M R, et al. The behavior of polymer-bentonite interface under shear stress[J]. Construction and Building Materials,2020,248:118680. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118680
    [38] 焦文涛, 方引青, 李绍华, 等.美国污染地块风险管控的发展历程、演变特征及启示[J]. 环境工程学报,2021,15(5):1821-1830. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.202009186

    JIAO W T, FANG Y Q, LI S H, et al. Risk management and control of contaminated sites in the United States: development process, evolution characteristics and enlightenment[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering,2021,15(5):1821-1830. ⊕ doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.202009186
  • 加载中
图(12) / 表(5)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  287
  • HTML全文浏览量:  194
  • PDF下载量:  18
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-07-01
  • 网络出版日期:  2022-06-07

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回