Spatio-temporal change and driving factor analysis of ecosystem service value in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region
-
摘要:
基于京津冀地区2000年、2010年和2018年土地利用分类数据，通过分析土地利用结构及其动态变化、构建生态系统服务价值（ESV）模型，探究京津冀地区13个地市ESV的时空演变，运用地理探测器分析京津冀地区ESV驱动因子。结果表明：1）2000—2018年，耕地是京津冀地区最主要的土地利用类型，建设用地是面积和动态度变化最剧烈的土地利用类型。2）2000—2018年京津冀地区ESV呈先下降后上升趋势，调节服务与支持服务始终是京津冀地区生态系统服务的核心功能，其中水文调节的贡献率最大。3）从时间上看，京津冀地区地均生态系统服务价值（AESV）变化不大。从空间上看，京津冀地区AESV空间分布差异明显，高值区主要分布在冀北和京津地区，低值区主要分布在中南部的平原地区。京津冀各地市AESV的变化较为明显，大多数地市呈减少趋势。4）各土地利用类型的敏感性指数均小于1，其中林地的敏感性指数最高，对ESV的影响最大。5）地理探测器分析表明，京津冀地区AESV在空间上的分布差异受到区域自然因子、经济因子和社会因子共同作用，其中高程、地均GDP、人口密度等因子的贡献率较大，不同驱动力之间的交互作用对京津冀地区AESV的空间分异影响明显增强。
-
关键词:
- 土地利用 /
- 生态系统服务价值(ESV) /
- 时空演变 /
- 地理探测器 /
- 京津冀地区
Abstract:Based on land use classification data in 2000, 2010 and 2018 in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region, the spatial-temporal evolution of ecosystem service value (ESV) in 13 cities were explored by analyzing land use structure and dynamic changes and constructing the ESV model, and the driving factors of ESV in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region were analyzed by geodetector. The results showed that: 1) From 2000 to 2018, cultivated land was the main land use type in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region. Construction land was the land use type with the largest changes in area and amplitude. 2) From 2000 to 2018, ESV in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region showed a downward trend and then an upward trend. Regulation services and support services were always the core functions of ecosystem services in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region, in which hydrological regulation contributed the most. 3) In terms of time, the average ESV (AESV) of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region had little change. From the perspective of space, the spatial distribution difference of AESV in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region was obvious. The high value areas were mainly distributed in the northern Hebei and Beijing-Tianjin regions, and the low value areas were mainly distributed in the plain areas in the central and southern regions. The change of AESV in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region was obvious, and most cities showed a decreasing trend. 4) The sensitivity index of each land use type was less than 1, and the sensitivity index of woodland was the highest, which had the greatest impact on ESV. 5) Geodetector analysis showed that the spatial distribution difference of AESV in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region was affected by regional natural, economic and social factors. The contribution rate of elevation, average GDP and population density was larger. The interaction between different driving forces had a significant effect on the spatial differentiation of AESV in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region.
-
图 1 2000—2018年京津冀地区不同土地利用类型面积变化
Figure 1. Area change of different land use types in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region from 2000 to 2018
图 2 2000—2018年京津冀地区AESV空间分布
Figure 2. Spatial distribution of AESV in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region from 2000 to 2018
图 3 2000—2018年京津冀地区AESV变化率空间分布
Figure 3. Spatial distribution of AESV change rate in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region from 2000 to 2018
表 1 京津冀地区单位面积生态系统服务价值系数
Table 1. Ecosystem service value coefficient per unit area in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region
元/hm2 生态系统功能构成 土地利用类型 一级 二级 耕地 林地 草地 水域 未利用土地 供给服务 粮食生产 2 187.50 492.68 453.27 788.29 19.71 原料生产 492.68 1 143.02 670.04 236.49 39.41 水资源供给 −2 581.64 591.22 374.44 10 306.87 19.71 调节服务 气体调节 1 753.94 3 764.08 2384.57 945.95 137.95 气候调节 926.24 11 252.81 6286.60 2798.42 98.54 净化环境 275.90 3 291.10 2069.26 5636.26 413.85 水文调节 2 956.08 7 370.49 4611.48 107778.68 236.49 支持服务 土壤保持 1 024.77 4 572.07 2896.96 926.24 157.66 维持养分循环 315.32 354.73 216.78 78.83 19.71 生物多样性 335.02 4 177.93 2 640.76 2522.52 137.95 文化服务 美学景观 157.66 3015.20 1162.72 1951.01 59.12 合计 7843.47 40025.33 23766.88 133969.56 1340.09 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 2000—2018年京津冀地区土地利用变化动态度
Table 2. Land use change dynamics degree in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region from 2000 to 2018
% 年份区间 单一土地利用动态度 综合土地利用动态度 耕地 林地 草地 水域 建设用地 未利用土地 2000—2010年 −0.13 −0.01 −0.07 −0.38 1.19 −0.37 0.10 2010—2018年 −0.96 0.30 −0.31 2.42 4.98 −2.30 0.57 2000—2018年 −0.49 0.13 −0.18 0.83 3.14 −1.19 0.30
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 京津冀地区2000—2018年生态系统功能单项服务价值
Table 3. Ecosystem individual service value of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region from 2000 to 2018
生态系统功能构成 2000年 2010年 2018年 一级 二级 价值/亿元 占比/% 价值/亿元 占比/% 价值/亿元 占比/% 供给服务 粮食生产 282.60 6.50 279.04 6.50 262.04 5.94 原料生产 130.16 2.99 129.17 3.01 126.00 2.86 水资源供给 −176.77 −4.07 −175.58 −4.09 −141.56 −3.21 小计 235.98 5.43 232.63 5.42 246.48 5.59 调节服务 气体调节 450.37 10.36 446.83 10.40 435.37 9.87 气候调节 843.18 19.40 839.21 19.54 841.45 19.07 净化环境 287.06 6.60 284.63 6.63 290.69 6.59 水文调节 1 509.03 34.72 1 477.07 34.39 1 585.88 35.94 小计 3 089.64 71.08 3 047.74 70.95 3 153.39 71.46 支持服务 土壤保持 424.53 9.77 421.91 9.82 416.88 9.45 养分循环 58.54 1.35 57.99 1.35 55.66 1.26 生物多样性 332.62 7.65 330.71 7.70 333.10 7.55 小计 815.70 18.77 810.62 18.87 805.64 18.26 文化服务 美学景观 205.46 4.73 204.38 4.76 207.60 4.70 合计 4 346.78 100 4 295.36 100 4 413.11 100
下载: 导出CSV
表 4 京津冀地区生态系统服务价值敏感性指数
Table 4. Sensitivity index of ecosystem services value in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region
年份 耕地 林地 草地 水域 未利用土地 2000 0.197 6 0.411 2 0.192 3 0.198 3 0.000 6 2010 0.197 3 0.415 8 0.193 2 0.193 1 0.000 6 2018 0.177 3 0.414 4 0.183 4 0.224 4 0.000 5
下载: 导出CSV
表 5 京津冀地区生态系统服务价值驱动因子
Table 5. Driving factors of ecosystem services value in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region
项目 X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6 X7 X8 X9 统计量(q) 0.141 0.272 0.073 0.176 0.212 0.171 0.063 0.032 0.204 P 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
下载: 导出CSV
表 6 地理探测器的交叉探测结果
Table 6. Cross detection results of geodetectors
驱动因子 X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6 X7 X8 X9 X1 0.141 X2 0.407 0.272 X3 0.185 0.253 0.073 X4 0.291 0.352 0.179 0.176 X5 0.325 0.412 0.193 0.234 0.212 X6 0.251 0.385 0.182 0.188 0.332 0.171 X7 0.162 0.291 0.079 0.178 0.253 0.184 0.063 X8 0.155 0.283 0.074 0.177 0.225 0.183 0.074 0.032 X9 0.215 0.289 0.206 0.208 0.298 0.225 0.213 0.203 0.204
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 王军, 顿耀龙.土地利用变化对生态系统服务的影响研究综述[J]. 长江流域资源与环境,2015,24(5):798-808.WANG J, DUN Y L. A review on the effects of land use change on ecosystem services[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin,2015,24(5):798-808. [2] 耿甜伟, 陈海, 张行, 等.基于GWR的陕西省生态系统服务价值时空演变特征及影响因素分析[J]. 自然资源学报,2020,35(7):1714-1727. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200715GENG T W, CHEN H, ZHANG H, et al. Spatiotemporal evolution of land ecosystem service value and its influencing factors in Shaanxi Province based on GWR[J]. Journal of Natural Resources,2020,35(7):1714-1727. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200715 [3] 石龙宇, 崔胜辉, 尹锴, 等.厦门市土地利用/覆被变化对生态系统服务的影响[J]. 地理学报,2010,65(6):708-714. doi: 10.11821/xb201006008SHI L Y, CUI S H, YIN K, et al. The impact of land use/cover change on ecosystem service in Xiamen[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica,2010,65(6):708-714. doi: 10.11821/xb201006008 [4] 侯春飞, 韩永伟, 孟晓杰, 等.雄安新区1995—2019年土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的影响[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2021,11(1):65-73. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20200049HOU C F, HAN Y W, MENG X J, et al. Effects of land-use change on ecosystem service values in Xiong'an New Area from 1995 to 2019[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2021,11(1):65-73. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20200049 [5] 欧阳晓, 贺清云, 朱翔.多情景下模拟城市群土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的影响: 以长株潭城市群为例[J]. 经济地理,2020,40(1):93-102.OUYANG X, HE Q Y, ZHU X. Simulation of impacts of urban agglomeration land use change on ecosystem services value under multi-scenarios: case study in Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan Urban Agglomeration[J]. Economic Geography,2020,40(1):93-102. [6] 朱治州, 钟业喜.长江三角洲城市群土地利用及其生态系统服务价值时空演变研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境,2019,28(7):1520-1530.ZHU Z Z, ZHONG Y X. Spatio-temporal evolution of land use and ecosystem service value in Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin,2019,28(7):1520-1530. [7] 董会忠, 姚孟超.成渝经济区土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的影响[J]. 水土保持通报,2020,40(1):213-220.DONG H Z, YAO M C. Impacts of land use change on value of ecosystem services in Chengdu-Chongqing Economic Zone[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,40(1):213-220. [8] 肖红克, 李洪忠, 王莉, 等.粤港澳大湾区土地利用及生态系统服务价值的变化: 以广佛肇为例[J]. 水土保持研究,2020,27(1):290-297.XIAO H K, LI H Z, WANG L, et al. Changes of land use and ecosystem service value in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area: a case study of Guangzhou-Foshan-Zhaoqing[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(1):290-297. [9] 刘慧明, 高吉喜, 刘晓, 等.国家重点生态功能区2010—2015年生态系统服务价值变化评估[J]. 生态学报,2020,40(6):1865-1876.LIU H M, GAO J X, LIU X, et al. Monitoring and assessment of the ecosystem services value in the national key ecological function zones[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2020,40(6):1865-1876. [10] 李付杰, 孙倩莹, 王世曦, 等.2000—2015年三江源区生态系统服务评估[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2020,10(5):786-797. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20200059LI F J, SUN Q Y, WANG S X, et al. Valuation of ecosystem services in Three-River Headwaters Region from 2000 to 2015[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2020,10(5):786-797. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20200059 [11] 陈万旭, 李江风, 朱丽君.长江中游地区生态系统服务价值空间分异及敏感性分析[J]. 自然资源学报,2019,34(2):325-337. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20190209CHEN W X, LI J F, ZHU L J. Spatial heterogeneity and sensitivity analysis of ecosystem services value in the Middle Yangtze River region[J]. Journal of Natural Resources,2019,34(2):325-337. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20190209 [12] 张瑜, 赵晓丽, 左丽君, 等.黄土高原土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的影响[J]. 国土资源遥感,2019,31(3):132-139.ZHANG Y, ZHAO X L, ZUO L J, et al. The impact of land use change on ecosystem services value in Loess Plateau[J]. Remote Sensing for Land & Resources,2019,31(3):132-139. [13] 钱大文, 曹广民, 杜岩功, 等.2000—2015年祁连山南坡生态系统服务价值时空变化[J]. 生态学报,2020,40(4):1392-1404.QIAN D W, CAO G M, DU Y G, et al. Spatio-temporal dynamics of ecosystem service value in the southern slope of Qilian Mountain from 2000 to 2015[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2020,40(4):1392-1404. [14] 麦麦提吐尔逊·艾则孜, 海米提·依米提, 祖皮艳木·买买提, 等.焉耆盆地土地利用变化对生态服务价值的影响[J]. 水土保持研究,2012,19(6):137-141.MAMATTURSUN E, HAMID Y, ZULPIYA M, et al. Effects of land use change on ecosystem service value in Yanqi Basin[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(6):137-141. [15] 赵景柱, 肖寒, 吴刚.生态系统服务的物质量与价值量评价方法的比较分析[J]. 应用生态学报,2000,11(2):290-292. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-9332.2000.02.034ZHAO J Z, XIAO H, WU G. Comparison analysis on physical and value assessment methods for ecosystems services[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2000,11(2):290-292. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-9332.2000.02.034 [16] 杨光梅, 李文华, 闵庆文.生态系统服务价值评估研究进展: 国外学者观点[J]. 生态学报,2006,26(1):205-212. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2006.01.027YANG G M, LI W H, MIN Q W. Review of foreign opinions on evaluation of ecosystem services[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2006,26(1):205-212. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2006.01.027 [17] 熊鹰, 张方明, 龚长安, 等.LUCC影响下湖南省生态系统服务价值时空演变[J]. 长江流域资源与环境,2018,27(6):1397-1408. doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201806024XIONG Y, ZHANG F M, GONG C A, et al. Spatial-temporal evolvement of ecosystem service value in Hunan Province based on LUCC[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin,2018,27(6):1397-1408. doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201806024 [18] 赵育恒, 曾晨.武汉城市圈生态服务价值时空演变分析及影响因素[J]. 生态学报,2019,39(4):1426-1440.ZHAO Y H, ZENG C. Analysis of spatial-temporal evolution and factors that influences ecological service values in Wuhan Urban Agglomeration, China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2019,39(4):1426-1440. [19] 陆大道.京津冀城市群功能定位及协同发展[J]. 地理科学进展,2015,34(3):265-270. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2015.03.001LU D D. Function orientation and coordinating development of subregions within the Jing-Jin-Ji Urban Agglomeration[J]. Progress in Geography,2015,34(3):265-270. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2015.03.001 [20] 汪东川, 孙志超, 孙然好, 等.京津冀城市群生态系统服务价值的时空动态演变[J]. 生态环境学报,2019,28(7):1285-1296.WANG D C, SUN Z C, SUN R H, et al. Spatial-temporal dynamic evolution of ecosystem service value in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Urban Agglomeration[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences,2019,28(7):1285-1296. [21] 娄佩卿, 付波霖, 林星辰, 等.基于GEE的1998—2018年京津冀土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的影响[J]. 环境科学,2019,40(12):5473-5483. [22] 唐秀美, 刘玉, 任艳敏, 等.基于需求的京津冀地区生态系统服务价值时空变化研究[J]. 北京大学学报(自然科学版),2021,57(1):173-180.TANG X M, LIU Y, REN Y M, et al. Evaluation and analysis of ecosystem services value in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region based on demand zoning[J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis,2021,57(1):173-180. [23] 盛晓雯, 曹银贵, 周伟, 等.京津冀地区土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的影响[J]. 中国农业资源与区划,2018,39(6):79-86.SHENG X W, CAO Y G, ZHOU W, et al. Impact of land use change on ecosystem service value in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning,2018,39(6):79-86. [24] 谢高地, 张彩霞, 张雷明, 等.基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J]. 自然资源学报,2015,30(8):1243-1254. doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2015.08.001XIE G D, ZHANG C X, ZHANG L M, et al. Improvement of the evaluation method for ecosystem service value based on per unit area[J]. Journal of Natural Resources,2015,30(8):1243-1254. doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2015.08.001 [25] COSTANZA R, D'ARGE R, de GROOT R, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Ecological Economics,1998,25(1):3-15. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00020-2 [26] 秦张瑶. 京津冀土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的影响研究[D]. 北京: 首都经济贸易大学, 2019. [27] 张鹏岩, 耿文亮, 杨丹, 等.黄河下游地区土地利用和生态系统服务价值的时空演变[J]. 农业工程学报,2020,36(11):277-288. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2020.11.033ZHANG P Y, GENG W L, YANG D, et al. Spatial-temporal evolution of land use and ecosystem service value in the Lower Reaches of the Yellow River Region[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2020,36(11):277-288. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2020.11.033 [28] 岳书平, 张树文, 闫业超.东北样带土地利用变化对生态服务价值的影响[J]. 地理学报,2007,62(8):879-886. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.2007.08.010YUE S P, ZHANG S W, YAN Y C. Impacts of land use change on ecosystem services value in the northeast China transect (NECT)[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica,2007,62(8):879-886. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.2007.08.010 [29] 王劲峰, 徐成东.地理探测器: 原理与展望[J]. 地理学报,2017,72(1):116-134. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201701010WANG J F, XU C D. Geodetector: principle and prospective[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica,2017,72(1):116-134. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201701010 [30] 胡凯衡, 魏丽, 刘双, 等.横断山区泥石流空间格局和激发雨量分异性研究[J]. 地理学报,2019,74(11):2303-2313. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201911008HU K H, WEI L, LIU S, et al. Spatial pattern of debris-flow catchments and the rainfall amount of triggering debris flows in the Hengduan Mountains region[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica,2019,74(11):2303-2313. ⊕ doi: 10.11821/dlxb201911008 -
下载:
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 463
- HTML全文浏览量: 495
- PDF下载量: 44
- 被引次数: 0
