菌藻共生系统净化污水处理厂尾水的条件探究与优化

贾晓彤; 何小娟; 封吉猛; 沈剑; 王欣泽

doi:10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210215

菌藻共生系统净化污水处理厂尾水的条件探究与优化

doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210215

贾晓彤^1,,
何小娟¹,
封吉猛^{1, 2, 3},
沈剑^{1, 2, 3},
王欣泽^{1, 2, 3, ,}

1.
上海交通大学环境科学与工程学院
2.
洱海湖泊生态系统野外科学观测研究站
3.
上海交通大学云南(大理)研究院

基金项目: 国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项（2012ZX07105-003，2014ZX07303-003-11）

详细信息

作者简介:
贾晓彤（1995—），女，硕士研究生，研究方向为污水处理，lwjxt95@163.com

通讯作者:
王欣泽（1974—），男，研究员，主要从事水污染控制工程研究，xinzewang@sjtu.edu.cn

中图分类号: X703
计量
- 文章访问数: 329
- HTML全文浏览量: 224
- PDF下载量: 69
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-06-06

Optimization of conditions for purification of wastewater treatment plant effluent by microalgae-bacteria symbiotic system

JIA Xiaotong^1
,,
HE Xiaojuan¹,
FENG Jimeng^{1, 2, 3},
SHEN Jian^{1, 2, 3},
WANG Xinze^{1, 2, 3
, ,}

1.
School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiaotong University
2.
Yunnan Erhai Lake Ecosystem Field Scientific Observation and Research Station
3.
Yunnan Dali Research Institute of Shanghai Jiaotong University

摘要

摘要:
城镇污水处理厂尾水排入水体后，尾水中的氮、磷仍易引起受纳水体富营养化问题，开展尾水深度处理以进一步去除氮、磷营养物质具有现实意义。通过试验研究了不同菌藻共培养对氮、磷的去除效果，筛选出优势菌藻组合，采用响应面法研究了通气量、光波长、细菌接种量对氮、磷去除效果的交互影响，提出最优参数组合，并建立菌藻共生系统，进行验证试验。结果表明：不同菌藻组合中，蛋白核小球藻-地衣芽胞杆菌-恶臭假单胞菌共培养组对TN、TP的去除效果较好；此菌藻共生系统在蓝光、通气量为1.8 L/min及细菌接种量为20%（体积比）条件下，TN去除率最大可达93.7%，1 d 后TP基本上完全被去除；在蓝光、通气量为2.0 L/min及细菌接种量为5%条件下，2 d后氮去除率可达98.4%；在红光、通气量为2.0~3.0 L/min及细菌接种量为10%~20%条件下，2 d后氨氮可完全被去除。菌藻共生系统对氮、磷去除效果的最优参数组合为蓝光、通气量为1.8 L/min及细菌接种量为20%，最优参数组合验证的结果与预测值相符，系统出水符合GB 3838—2002《地表水环境质量标准》Ⅴ类水质标准，可为菌藻共生系统的实际应用提供理论基础。
- 菌藻共生 /
- 响应面法优化 /
- 氮、磷去除效果 /
- 蛋白核小球藻 /
- 污水处理厂尾水
Abstract:
The effluent from municipal wastewater treatment plants contains nitrogen and phosphorus compounds, and the effluent discharged into the water body is still easy to cause eutrophication. The study on advanced treatment of effluent to further remove nitrogen and phosphorus pollutants is of practical significance. The removal effect of co-cultivation of different bacteria and microalgae on nitrogen and phosphorus was studied in the experiment, and the combination of dominant bacteria and microalgae was screened out. Response surface methodology (RSM) was used to study the interactive effects of light wavelength (LW), aeration rate (AR) and the inoculation ratio of bacteria (IR) on the removal effect of nitrogen and phosphorus. The optimal parameter combination was proposed, a microalga-bacterial symbiosis system was established, and a verification experiment was carried out. The results showed that among different combinations of algae and bacteria, the co-culture group of Chlorella proteinosa, Bacillus licheniformis and Pseudomonas putida had the best removal effect on TN and TP. When LW was blue light, AR was 1.8 L/min, and IR was 20%, TN maximum removal rate could reach 93.7%, and TP was basically completely removed after 1 day. When LW was blue light, AR was 2.0 L/min, and IR was 5%, the removal rate of ammonia nitrogen after 2 days was 98.4%. When LW was red light, AR was 2.0-3.0 L/min, and IR was 10%-20%, ammonia nitrogen after 2 days was basically completely removed. When LW was blue light, AR was 1.8 L/min, and IR was 20%, it was the optimal parameter condition for nitrogen and phosphorus removal efficiency. The verification results of the optimized parameter combination were consistent with the predicted values. The effluent of the system met Class Ⅴ of Environmental Quality Standards for Surface Water (GB 3838-2002), which provided a theoretical basis for the practical application of the microalgae-bacteria symbiotic system.
- symbiosis of bacteria and microalgae /
- response surface methodology optimization /
- nitrogen and phosphorus removal effect /
- Chlorella proteinosa /
- wastewater treatment plant effluent

HTML全文

图 1 不同菌藻共培养条件下的氮、磷去除效果

Figure 1. Nitrogen and phosphorus removal effects under co-cultivation of different bacteria and microalgae

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 不同细菌接种量条件下光波长和通气量对TN去除率的影响

Figure 2. Effects of light wavelength and aeration rate on TN removal rate under different bacterial inoculation amount

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 红光/蓝光条件下通气量和细菌接种量的交互作用对TN去除率的影响

Figure 3. Effects of the interaction of aeration rate and bacterial inoculation amount on TN removal rate under red/blue light conditions

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 光波长和细菌接种量的交互作用对2 d氨氮去除率的影响

Figure 4. Effect of the interaction of light wavelength and bacterial inoculation amount on ammonia nitrogen removal after 2 days

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 红光/蓝光条件下通气量和细菌接种量的交互作用对2 d氨氮去除率的影响

Figure 5. Effect of the interaction of aeration rate and bacterial inoculation amount on ammonia nitrogen removal after 2 days under red/blue light conditions

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 光波长和细菌接种量交互作用对1 d的TP去除效果的影响

Figure 6. Effect of the interaction of light wavelength and bacterial inoculation amount on TP removal after 1 day

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 培养5 d后菌藻共生情况SEM图

Figure 7. SEM diagram of symbiosis of bacteria and algae after 5 day's culture

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 响应面优化试验的因子及水平设计

Table 1. Code and levels for testing variables of response surface methodology experiments

试验组号	光波长(A)	通气量(B)/(L/min)	细菌接种量(C)/%
1	红光	2	5
2	蓝光	2	10
3	蓝光	2	10
4	蓝光	2	10
5	蓝光	3	5
6	蓝光	1	5
7	红光	3	10
8	蓝光	1	20
9	白光	3	10
10	白光	2	20
11	蓝光	3	20
12	白光	1	10
13	白光	2	5
14	蓝光	2	10
15	蓝光	2	10
16	红光	1	10
17	红光	2	20
注：光波长为白光时，A=−1；为蓝光时，A=0；为红光时，A=1。

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 响应面试验结果

Table 2. Response surface methodology experimental results 　

试验组号	去除率/%
试验组号	TN	TP	氨氮	1 d 的TP	2 d的氨氮
1	89.95	97.39	98.17	92.52	96.25
2	93.41	99.55	98.39	85.92	98.32
3	92.09	98.48	97.57	90.51	96.36
4	93.98	98.64	98.69	81.83	94.97
5	88.20	97.81	98.49	59.84	89.12
6	84.46	99.04	98.46	60.08	86.40
7	89.19	97.26	98.31	68.49	96.36
8	91.15	97.24	98.15	87.64	67.02
9	89.60	98.07	97.90	44.55	56.94
10	92.41	99.71	98.42	94.37	43.43
11	89.86	98.83	98.30	82.82	90.52
12	82.87	98.33	98.62	38.28	46.92
13	86.73	97.33	98.50	35.29	74.05
14	91.28	98.13	98.50	85.21	93.49
15	91.19	97.39	97.65	86.02	95.43
16	89.51	98.68	98.21	56.58	86.62
17	92.20	98.06	98.15	92.17	94.33

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 响应值为TN、2 d的氨氮、1 d的TP去除率的方差分析结果

Table 3. Anova results of removal rate of TN, ammonia nitrogen after 2 days and TP after 1 days

方差来源	TN去除率		2 d的氨氮去除率		1 d的TP去除率
方差来源	F	P	F	P	F	P
模型	14.11	0.001 1	59.80	< 0.000 1	21.20	0.000 3
A	7.09	0.032 3	316.34	< 0.000 1	22.82	0.002 0
B	5.54	0.050 8	34.14	0.000 6	0.40	0.548 4
C	31.00	0.000 8	32.80	0.000 7	45.75	0.000 3
AB	11.63	0.011 3	0.002 0	0.965 4	0.24	0.636 6
AC	3.49	0.104 1	18.68	0.003 5	23.83	0.001 8
BC	7.18	0.031 6	11.63	0.011 3	0.52	0.494 7
A²	7.14	0.031 9	99.06	< 0.000 1	25.17	0.001 5
B²	41.65	0.000 3	34.11	0.000 6	51.40	0.000 2
C²	7.29	0.030 6	0.88	0.379 4	0.54	0.486 8
失拟项	0.24	0.863 2	5.76	0.061 9	6.62	0.049 7

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(24)

[1]	国家环境保护总局. 城镇污水处理厂污染物排放标准: GB 18918—2002[S]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2002.
[2]	国家环境保护总局, 国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 地表水环境质量标准: GB 3838—2002[S]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2002.
[3]	谢艳艳, 吉凯锋, 纪婧, 等.膜-高效藻类塘工艺处理污水厂尾水[J]. 水处理技术,2016,42(6):67-70. XIE Y Y, JI K F, JI J, et al. Combined membrane-high rate algal pound for advanced treatment of municipal wastewater treatment plant effluent[J]. Technology of Water Treatment,2016,42(6):67-70.
[4]	赵建国, 李洪波, 刘存歧, 等.永定河怀来段水体富营养化评价[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2018,8(3):248-256. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-991X.2018.03.033 ZHAO J G, LI H B, LIU C Q, et al. Evaluation of eutrophication of water body in Huailai section of Yongding River[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2018,8(3):248-256. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-991X.2018.03.033
[5]	SALAMA E S, KURADE, M B, ABOU-SHANAB R A I, et al. Recent progress in microalgal biomass production coupled with wastewater treatment for biofuel generation[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,2017,79:1189-1211. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.091
[6]	CHAMBERLIN J, HARRISON K, ZHANG W. Impact of nutrient availability on tertiary wastewater treatment by Chlorella vulgaris[J]. Water Environment Research,2018,90(11):2008-2016. doi: 10.2175/106143017X15131012188114
[7]	ZHANG S S, LIU H, FAN J F, et al. Cultivation of Scenedesmus dimorphus with domestic secondary effluent and energy evaluation for biodiesel production.[J]. Environmental Technology,2015,36(7):929-936. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2014.966769
[8]	LÜ J P, FENG J, LIU Q, et al. Microalgal cultivation in secondary effluent: recent developments and future work[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences,2017,18(1):1-18.
[9]	LANANAN F, HAMID S H A, DIN W N S, et al. Symbiotic bioremediation of aquaculture wastewater in reducing ammonia and phosphorus utilizing Effective Microorganism (EM-1) and microalgae (Chlorella sp. )[J]. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation,2014,95:127-134.
[10]	胡洪营, 李鑫, 杨佳.基于微藻细胞培养的水质深度净化与高价值生物质生产耦合技术[J]. 生态环境学报,2009,18(3):1122-1127. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5906.2009.03.059 HU H Y, LI X, YANG J. Coupling of wastewater deep purification and high quality biomass production based on microalgae cultivation[J]. Ecology and Environment,2009,18(3):1122-1127. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5906.2009.03.059
[11]	骆小英. 蛋白核小球藻高效生物转化硝酸盐联产高价值生物质[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2020.
[12]	汤会军, 李鑫, 胡洪营, 等.初始密度及饥饿对栅藻LX1氮磷去除的影响[J]. 水处理技术,2010,36(7):33-35. TANG H J, LI X, HU H Y, et al. Effect of initial cell densities and starvation treatment on the nitrogen, phosphorus removal properties of Scenedesmus sp. LX1[J]. Technology of Water Treatment,2010,36(7):33-35.
[13]	付婷婷, 马宁, 蒙健宗, 等.基于响应面法优化一株海洋绿藻胞内多糖提取工艺[J]. 中国酿造,2015,34(9):115-120. doi: 10.11882/j.issn.0254-5071.2015.09.027 FU T T, MA N, MENG J Z, et al. Optimization of extraction technology of a marine algae intracellular polysaccharide based on response surface methodology[J]. China Brewing,2015,34(9):115-120. doi: 10.11882/j.issn.0254-5071.2015.09.027
[14]	VILLAY A, LAROCHE C, RORIZ D, et al. Optimisation of culture parameters for exopolysaccharides production by the microalga Rhodella violacea[J]. Bioresource Technology,2013,146:732-735. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.07.030
[15]	KENDIRLIOGLU G, AGIRMAN N, CETIN A K. The effects of photoperiod on the growth, protein amount and pigment content of Chlorella vulgaris[J]. Turkish Journal of Science & Technology,2015,10(2):7-10.
[16]	SCHULZE P S C, PEREIRA H G C, SANTOS T F C, et al. Effect of light quality supplied by light emitting diodes (LEDs) on growth and biochemical profiles of Nannochloropsis oculata and Tetraselmis chuii[J]. Algal Research,2016,16:387-398. doi: 10.1016/j.algal.2016.03.034
[17]	PRAVEEN P, LOH K C. Photosynthetic aeration in biological wastewater treatment using immobilized microalgae-bacteria symbiosis[J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology,2015,99(23):10345-10354. doi: 10.1007/s00253-015-6896-3
[18]	WANG Y, YANG Y, MA F, et al. Optimization of Chlorella vulgaris and bioflocculant-producing bacteria co-culture: enhancing microalgae harvesting and lipid content[J]. Letters in Applied Microbiology,2015,60(5):497-503. doi: 10.1111/lam.12403
[19]	ZHAO B T, SU Y X. Process effect of microalgal-carbon dioxide fixation and biomass production: a review[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,2014,31:121-132. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.11.054
[20]	SCHULZE P S, BARREIRA L A, PEREIRA H G, et al. Light emitting diodes (LEDs) applied to microalgal production[J]. Trends in Biotechnology,2014,32(8):422-430. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2014.06.001
[21]	蔡天明, 管莉菠, 崔中利, 等.恶臭假单胞菌(Pseudomonas putida)GM6的聚磷特性研究[J]. 土壤学报,2006,43(1):117-123. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0564-3929.2006.01.017 CAI T M, GUAN L B, CUI Z L, et al. Characterization of Pseudomonas putida GM6 with high capability of accumulating poly-P[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,2006,43(1):117-123. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0564-3929.2006.01.017
[22]	JI X Y, JIANG M Q, ZHANG J B, et al. The interactions of algae-bacteria symbiotic system and its effects on nutrients removal from synthetic wastewater[J]. Bioresource Technology,2018,247:44-50. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.074
[23]	ESTEVES A F, SOARES O S G P, VILAR V J P, et al. The effect of light wavelength on CO₂ capture, biomass production and nutrient uptake by green microalgae: a step forward on process integration and optimisation[J]. Energies,2020,13(2):1-14.
[24]	DAO G H, WU G X, WANG X X, et al. Enhanced microalgae growth through stimulated secretion of indole acetic acid by symbiotic bacteria[J]. Algal Research,2018,33:345-351. ◇ doi: 10.1016/j.algal.2018.06.006