水专项科技成果转化绩效及影响因素实证研究

吴静; 王深; 谢显传; 吕连宏; 罗宏

doi:10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210046

水专项科技成果转化绩效及影响因素实证研究

doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210046

吴静^1,,
王深¹,
谢显传²,
吕连宏^1,*, ,,
罗宏¹

1.
中国环境科学研究院
2.
南京大学环境学院

详细信息

作者简介:
吴静(1986—),女,高级工程师,博士,主要从事环境治理、环境经济与政策研究, wujing0520@126.com

通讯作者:
吕连宏 E-mail: lvlh@craes.org.cn

中图分类号: X32
计量
- 文章访问数: 389
- HTML全文浏览量: 105
- PDF下载量: 37
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-02-25
- 刊出日期: 2021-11-20

Empirical studies on the performance and influencing factors of the transformation of scientific and technological achievements in Water Major Project

1.
Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences
2.
School of Environment, Nanjing University

More Information

Corresponding author: LÜ Lianhong E-mail: lvlh@craes.org.cn

摘要

摘要: 科技成果转化是实现创新驱动发展战略的重要举措,对我国经济高质量发展具有重要意义。以国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项(简称水专项)淮河项目的科技成果转化为例,在实地调查的基础上,系统分析其科技成果转化和产业化的运行机制,采用层次分析法测度水专项淮河项目科技成果转化绩效,通过构建多元有序Logistic回归模型,分析成果转化绩效的影响因素。结果表明:新型研发机构模式的科技成果转化绩效最好,其次是高校孵化模式和环保企业合作转化模式;参与水专项项目的连续性、技术的先进性、研发资金占比、技术联盟的作用、政府提供的资金和硬件条件支持以及绩效考核激励是影响水专项淮河项目绩效水平的重要因素。未来,加快构建以创新平台为重要载体的生态环境科技成果转化体系,系统推动生态环境领域科技成果真正转化落地,还需要政府、市场和科研创新主体的共同发力。
- 科技成果转化 /
- 转化绩效 /
- 科技创新 /
- 水专项
Abstract: The transformation of scientific and technological achievements is an important measure to realize the strategy of innovation-driven development, and it is of great significance for the high-quality development of China's economy. Taking the transformation of scientific and technological achievements of Science and Technology Major Project for Water Pollution Control and Treatment (Water Major Project)in the Huaihe River as an example, the operation mechanism of the transformation and industrialization of its scientific and technological achievements was analyzed systematically on the basis of field investigation. Analytic hierarchy process was used to measure the transformation performance of the scientific and technological achievements, meanwhile, the influencing factors of achievement transformation performance were analyzed by constructing multiple ordered Logistic regression model. The results indicated that the new research and development organization model had the best performance in the transformation of scientific and technological achievements, followed by the universities incubation model and the cooperative transformation model of environmental protection enterprises. The results also suggested that the continuity of participation in Water Major Project, advanced technology, research and development capital ratio, the role of technology alliance, the fund and hardware support provided by the government, and performance appraisal incentive were important factors affecting the performance level of Water Major Project in the Huaihe River. In the future, the joint efforts of the government, the market and the scientific research innovation bodies were needed to accelerate the construction of an eco-environmental scientific and technological achievement transformation system with innovation platforms as the important carrier, and to systematically promote the real transformation and implementation of scientific and technological achievements in the field of eco-environment.
- scientific and technological achievements transformation /
- transformation performance /
- scientific and technological innovation /
- Water Major Project

HTML全文

参考文献(33)

[1]	刘学之, 马婧, 彭洁, 等. 美国国家实验室成果转化路径解析与制度保障[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2015, 32(11):20-25. LIU X Z, MA J, PENG J, et al. Technology transfer path and institutional guarantee of national laboratory in America[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2015, 32(11):20-25.
[2]	王金南, 孙宏亮, 续衍雪, 等. 关于“十四五”长江流域水生态环境保护的思考[J]. 环境科学研究, 2020, 33(5):1075-1080. WANG J N, SUN H L, XU Y X, et al. Water eco-environment protection framework in the Yangtze River Basin during the 14th Five-Year Plan period[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2020, 33(5):1075-1080.
[3]	常杪, 杨亮, 王世汶. 政策机制变革下的环保产业特征分析[J]. 环境保护, 2015, 43(8):24-26. CHANG M, YANG L, WANG S W. Analysing the characteristics of the environmental protection industry under the background of policy mechanism reforming[J]. Environmental Protection, 2015, 43(8):24-26.
[4]	赵云皓, 孙宁, 辛璐, 等. 环保产业发展不同阶段环境政策制度作用力研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2014, 24(增刊1):34-37. ZHAO Y H, SUN N, XIN L, et al. Study of environmental policy / system force in different stages of environmental protection industry[J]. China Population,Resources and Environment, 2014, 24(Suppl 1):34-37.
[5]	RATINHO T, HENRIQUES E. The role of science parks and business incubators in converging countries:evidence from Portugal[J]. Technovation, 2010, 30(4):278-290. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2009.09.002
[6]	孙涛. 我国老工业基地科技成果转化效率评价研究:以东北地区为例[J]. 中国软科学, 2020(1):164-170. SUN T. Evaluation of the efficiency of transformation of scientific and technological achievements in northeast region based on DEA[J]. China Soft Science, 2020(1):164-170.
[7]	DAS G G. Information age to genetic revolution:embodied technology transfer and assimilation:a tale of two technologies[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2007, 74(6):819-842. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2006.07.001
[8]	LIN B. The research on social capital of industry-university-research institute cooperation[J]. Asian Social Science, 2009, 4(11):118.
[9]	DIENER B J, TERKLA D. The environmental industry in Massachusetts:from rapid growth to maturity[J]. Corporate Environmental Strategy, 2000, 7(3):304-313. doi: 10.1016/S1066-7938(00)80125-6
[10]	SUN B J, FENG C H. The mode and common points of the innovation of industry university research cooperation in the main developed countries[J]. Cross-cultural Communication, 2015, 11(11):72-75.
[11]	SATHAYE J A, HOLT E C, de la RUE du CAN S. Overview of IPR practices for publicly-funded technologies[R]. Tennessee:Office of Scientific and Technical Information(OSTI),2005.
[12]	GRIMALDI R, GRANDI A. Business incubators and new venture creation:an assessment of incubating models[J]. Technovation, 2005, 25(2):111-121. doi: 10.1016/S0166-4972(03)00076-2
[13]	HUGHES M, IRELAND R D, MORGAN R E. Stimulating dynamic value:social capital and business incubation as a pathway to competitive success[J]. Long Range Planning, 2007, 40(2):154-177. doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2007.03.008
[14]	王宏起, 吕建秋, 王珊珊. 科技成果转化的双边市场属性及其政策启示:基于成果转化平台的视角[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2018, 39(2):42-51. WANG H Q, LÜ J Q, WANG S S. Research on the two-sided market features and policy implications of S & T achievement transformation:from the perspective of achievement transformation platform[J]. Science of Science and Management of S. & T., 2018, 39(2):42-51.
[15]	JIE Q I N, WEI S. The construction of the legal environment of the transformation of the scientific and technological achievements in China[J]. Canadian Social Science, 2015, 11(10):16-22.
[16]	刘磊, 胡恩华, 单红梅. 科技成果转化研究述评:基于知识图谱的可视化分析[J]. 经济体制改革, 2020(2):120-128. LIU L, HU E H, SHAN H M. Domestic transformation of scientific and technological achievements based on knowledge mapping:a visual analysis[J]. Reform of Economic System, 2020(2):120-128.
[18]	史竹琴, 朱先奇, 许亚斌. 科技园区创新成果转化的路径研究:基于多主体合作视角[J]. 经济问题, 2020(1):70-78. SHI Z Q, ZHU X Q, XU Y B. Research on the path of transforming innovation achievements in science and technology park:from the perspective of multi-agent cooperation[J]. On Economic Problems, 2020(1):70-78.
[19]	罗茜, 高蓉蓉, 曹丽娜. 高校科技成果转化效率测度分析与影响因素扎根研究:以江苏省为例[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2018, 35(5):43-51. LUO Q, GAO R R, CAO L N. The grounded research of impact factors and the measure analysis of transformation efficiency of scientific and technological achievements in colleges and universities:case study of Jiangsu Province[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2018, 35(5):43-51.
[20]	杜伟锦, 宋园, 李靖, 等. 科技成果转化政策演进及区域差异分析:以京津冀和长三角为例[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2017, 38(2):3-11. DU W J, SONG Y, LI J, et al. Scientific and technological achievements into the policy development and analysis of regional differences:a case study of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei and the Yangtze River Delta[J]. Science of Science and Management of S. & T., 2017, 38(2):3-11.
[21]	李天柱, 侯锡林, 马佳. 基于接力创新的高校科技成果转化机制研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2017, 34(3):147-151. LI T Z, HOU X L, MA J. A study on university science and technology achievement transformation mechanism:based on relay innovation[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2017, 34(3):147-151.
[22]	孙涛. 东北地区科技成果转化路径的优化研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2019(1):175-183. SUN T. Study on the transformation and optimization of the scientific achievement in northeast area of China based on the evolutionary of game theory[J]. China Soft Science, 2019(1):175-183.
[23]	李政刚. 赋予科研人员职务科技成果所有权的法律释义及实现路径[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2020, 37(5):124-130. LI Z G. Legal interpretation and realization route of confering ownership of scientific and technological achievements of scientific researchers[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2020, 37(5):124-130.
[24]	钟卫, 陈宝明. 中国高校科技成果转化绩效评价研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2018(4):41-49. ZHONG W, CHEN B M. Assessment of the efficiency of scientific and technological achievements transformation in Chinese universities[J]. Forum on Science and Technology in China, 2018(4):41-49.
[25]	田蓬鹏, 李冬梅, 姜心禄, 等. 种业科研人员参与科技成果转化的响应行为研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2020(3):135-147. TIAN P P, LI D M, JIANG X L, et al. Response behavior of seed science researchers participating in the transformation of scientific and technological achievements[J]. Forum on Science and Technology in China, 2020(3):135-147.
[26]	刘永千. 科技成果转化能力评价研究:以上海市为例[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2017(1):12-18. LIU Y Q. Investigation of the capability of technology transfer:evidence from Shanghai[J]. Forum on Science and Technology in China, 2017(1):12-18.
[27]	唐五湘. 科技成果转化绩效评价指标体系的比较分析[J]. 工业技术经济, 2017, 36(1):61-67. TANG W X. Comparative analysis study on evaluation index system of transformation performance of scientific and technological achievement[J]. Journal of Industrial Technological & Economics, 2017, 36(1):61-67.
[28]	戚湧, 朱婷婷, 郭逸. 科技成果市场转化模式与效率评价研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2015(6):184-192. QI Y, ZHU T T, GUO Y. Research on the model and efficiency evaluation of the market transformation of scientific and technological achievements[J]. China Soft Science, 2015(6):184-192.
[29]	WANG E C. R & D efficiency and economic performance:a cross-country analysis using the stochastic frontier approach[J]. Journal of Policy Modeling, 2007, 29(2):345-360. doi: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2006.12.005
[30]	CHEN H H, KANG H Y, XING X Q, et al. Developing new products with knowledge management methods and process development management in a network[J]. Computers in Industry, 2008, 59(2/3):242-253. doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2007.06.020
[31]	SINGH R K, MURTY H R, GUPTA S K, et al. Development of composite sustainability performance index for steel industry[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2007, 7(3):565-588. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2006.06.004
[32]	陈涛涛, 陈红喜, 丁子仪. 我国科技成果转化政策演进脉络及未来进路分析[J]. 经济师, 2020(2):11-13.
[33]	LUO M, SHI L, XIE M J. Research on the construction performance assessment of industry-university-research cooperation in collaborative innovation to promote the practice base construction based on CDIO idea[J]. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 2017, 33(6):3217-3226.
[34]	杨荣金, 孙美莹, 张乐, 等. 长江经济带生态环境保护的若干战略问题[J]. 环境科学研究, 2020, 33(8):1795-1804. YANG R J, SUN M Y, ZHANG L, et al. Strategic issues of ecological environment protection in the Yangtze River economic belt[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2020, 33(8):1795-1804.