煤矿锈水对饮用水水源地环境风险评价方法及案例研究

李云; 谭伟; 李娇; 李君超; 蒋进元

doi:10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20200238

煤矿锈水对饮用水水源地环境风险评价方法及案例研究

doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20200238

李云^1,2,,
谭伟¹,
李娇¹,
李君超¹,
蒋进元^1,*, ,

1.
中国环境科学研究院
2.
生态环境部土壤与农业农村生态环境监管技术中心

详细信息

作者简介:
李云(1987—),女,副研究员,博士,主要研究方向为水处理技术及资源化利用, liyunliyun1234567@163.com

通讯作者:
蒋进元 E-mail: jiangjy@craes.org.cn

中图分类号: X321
计量
- 文章访问数: 400
- HTML全文浏览量: 159
- PDF下载量: 63
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-09-25
- 刊出日期: 2021-07-20

Environmental risk assessment method of coal mine rust water to drinking water sources and case study

LI Yun^{1,2
,},
TAN Wei¹,
LI Jiao¹,
LI Junchao¹,
JIANG Jinyuan^{1,*
, ,}

1.
Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences
2.
Technical Centre for Soil, Agriculture and Rural Ecology and Environment, Ministry of Ecology and Environment

More Information

Corresponding author: JIANG Jinyuan E-mail: jiangjy@craes.org.cn

摘要

摘要: 为了评价煤矿矿井涌水对饮用水水源地的环境风险,采用层次分析法构建了由风险源、风险受体、迁移通道、应急管理4个层面共12项指标构成的评价指标体系,建立了环境风险评价方法,采用该方法从定性和定量角度评价四川某区县3个煤矿对饮用水水源地的环境风险。定性分析结果表明:3个煤矿作为风险源,其水质指标Fe、Zn、Mn超标倍数较高,可能会存在环境风险;风险受体饮用水水源地近年水质达标率为100%,环境容量较大;由风险源至风险受体的迁移通道距离较长,沿途溪流、土壤和植被具备一定的稀释、降解和消纳能力。定量评价结果表明,3个煤矿的环境风险指数分别为0.504 2、0.494 4和0.288 9,对应的环境风险分级分别是一般、一般和较低。
- 煤矿锈水 /
- 矿井 /
- 涌水 /
- 饮用水水源 /
- 环境风险评价
Abstract: To evaluate the environmental risk of coal mine water to drinking water sources, the analytic hierarchy process was used to construct an evaluation index system composed of four aspects and 12 indexes. The four aspects included risk source, risk receptor, migration channels and emergency management. An environmental risk assessment method was established so as to evaluate qualitatively and quantitatively the environmental risks of three coal mines to the drinking water sources in a county area of Sichuan Province. The qualitative analysis results showed that the three coal mines were identified as risk sources, the water quality indexes of Fe, Zn, Mn exceeded the standard by a high multiple, which may cause environmental risks. In recent years, the water quality up-to-standard rate of the drinking water sources as risk recipients was 100%, and the environmental capacity was large. The migration channels from the risk sources to the risk receptors had a long distance, and the stream, soil and vegetation along the way had certain dilution, degradation and absorption capacity. The quantitative evaluation results showed that the environmental risk index of the three coal mines was 0.504 2, 0.494 4 and 0.288 9, respectively, and the corresponding environmental risk classification was average, average and low, respectively.
- rust water of coal mine /
- mine /
- gushing water /
- drinking water sources /
- environmental risk assessment

HTML全文

参考文献(16)

[1]	李旭, 吕佳佩, 裴莹莹, 等. 国内突发环境事件特征分析[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2021, 11(2):401-408. LI X, LÜ J P, PEI Y Y, et al. Analysis of the characteristics of environmental emergencies in China[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2021, 11(2):401-408.
[2]	韩晓刚, 黄廷林. 我国突发性水污染事件统计分析[J]. 水资源保护, 2010, 26(1):84-86. HAN X G, HUANG T L. Statistical analysis of sudden water pollution accidents[J]. Water Resources Protection, 2010, 26(1):84-86.
[3]	BAKEN K A, SJERPS R M A, SCHRIKS M, et al. Toxicological risk assessment and prioritization of drinking water relevant contaminants of emerging concern[J]. Environment International, 2018, 118:293-303. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.05.006
[4]	HE Z Y, WU C. Research of risk assessment system on tailings pond water pollution[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2011, 26:1788-1797. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.2368
[5]	李莹莹, 张永江, 邓茂, 等. 武陵山区域典型生态保护城市饮用水源地水质人体健康风险评价[J]. 环境科学研究, 2017, 30(2):282-290. LI Y Y, ZHANG Y J, DENG M, et al. Water quality health risk assessment in urban drinking water sources of typical ecological protection areas in Wuling mountain[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2017, 30(2):282-290.
[6]	王树南. 位于水库型水源地准保护区的工业园企业环境风险评价方法研究[D]. 合肥:合肥工业大学, 2017.
[7]	DONG W W, ZHANG Y, QUAN X. Health risk assessment of heavy metals and pesticides:a case study in the main drinking water source in Dalian,China[J]. Chemosphere, 2020, 242:125113. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125113
[8]	李庭. 废弃矿井地下水污染风险评价研究[D]. 徐州:中国矿业大学, 2014.
[9]	杨张瑜, 田淑芳, 魏萌, 等. 基于模糊层次分析法的尾矿库环境风险评价研究[J]. 测绘与空间地理信息, 2019, 42(9):16-21. YANG Z Y, TIAN S F, WEI M, et al. Research on environmental risk assessment of tailings reservoir based on fuzzy analytic hierarchy process[J]. Geomatics & Spatial Information Technology, 2019, 42(9):16-21.
[10]	徐星, 孙文标. 层次分析法在煤矿突水风险评价中的应用[J]. 煤炭技术, 2016, 35(6):143-144. XU X, SUN W B. Application of AHP on risk evaluation for coal mine water-inrush[J]. Coal Technology, 2016, 35(6):143-144.
[11]	ZHAO D, WANG Z R, SONG Z Y, et al. Assessment of domino effects in the coal gasification process using Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and Bayesian Network[J]. Safety Science, 2020, 130:104888. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104888
[12]	田培, 付青, 郑丙辉, 等. 红枫湖饮用水水源地的工业企业环境风险评价[J]. 环境科学研究, 2013, 26(7):787-792. TIAN P, FU Q, ZHENG B H, et al. Environmental risk assessment of industrial enterprises in drinking water sources of Hongfeng Lake[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2013, 26(7):787-792.
[13]	贾倩, 黄蕾, 袁增伟, 等. 石化企业突发环境风险评价与分级方法研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2010, 30(7):1510-1517. JIA Q, HUANG L, YUAN Z W, et al. Assessment and management of accidental environmental risks in the petro-chemical industry[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2010, 30(7):1510-1517.
[14]	EMERSON S D, NADEAU J. A coastal perspective on security[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2003, 104(1/2/3):1-13. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3894(03)00230-9
[15]	尹荣尧, 杨潇, 孙翔, 等. 江苏沿海化工区环境风险分级及优先管理策略研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2011, 31(7):1225-1232. YIN R Y, YANG X, SUN X, et al. Environmental risk rankings and prior management strategies on chemical industry parks in the coastal area of Jiangsu Province[J]. China Environmental Science, 2011, 31(7):1225-1232.
[16]	国家煤矿安全监察局关于印发《煤矿防治水细则》的通知:煤安监调查〔2018〕14号[A/OL].( 2018-07-02)[2020-05-06]. http://www.chinacoal-safety.gov.cn/zfxxgk/fdzdgknr/tzgg/201807/t20180702_349115.shtml.