2种生态植草沟对路面径流净化效果的对比

张瑞斌()

doi:10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20200181

2种生态植草沟对路面径流净化效果的对比

doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20200181

张瑞斌()

1.
江苏龙腾工程设计股份有限公司
2.
江苏省雨污水资源化利用工程技术研究中心
3.
南京市生态河道工程技术研究中心

计量
- 文章访问数: 411
- HTML全文浏览量: 101
- PDF下载量: 118
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-07-22
- 刊出日期: 2021-05-20

Comparison of the effect of two kinds of ecological grass swales on road runoff purification

ZHANG Ruibin()

1.
Jiangsu Long-leaping Engineering Design Co., Ltd.
2.
Nanjing Engineering Technology Research Center for Rainwater and Wastewater Utilization
3.
Nanjing Ecological River Engineering Technology Research Center

摘要

摘要: 将铝污泥生物填料与台阶型植草沟相结合,构建台阶型生态植草沟系统,现场比较台阶型生态植草沟和常规生态植草沟对路面径流的净化效果。结果表明:在2次降雨(大雨、中雨)事件中,台阶型生态植草沟径流量削减效果优于常规植草沟,径流总量削减率分别为63.04%和55.21%,峰值流量显著降低,峰值时间至少延迟24~30 min;台阶型生态植草沟具有较好的水质控制及污染负荷削减效果,对径流中SS、COD_Cr、NH₃-N、TN和TP浓度削减率分别可达79.54%、67.08%、34.75%、63.61%和78.36%,对总量削减率分别可达92.44%、87.83%、74.29%、84.45%和90.31%,出流水质均优于GB 3838—2002《地表水环境质量标准》Ⅳ类水质标准。台阶型生态植草沟对路面径流可取得较好的水质控制及污染负荷削减效果,具有较好的推广应用价值。
- 台阶型植草沟 /
- 铝污泥 /
- 径流控制 /
- 浓度削减 /
- 总量削减
Abstract: The biological packing of aluminum sludge was combined with the stepped ecological grass swale to construct stepped ecological grass swale system, and the effects of stepped ecological grass swale and conventional grass swale on the road runoff purification were compared. The results showed that effect of stepped ecological grass swale on the runoff volume reduction was better than that of conventional grass swale in the two rainfall events, and the reduction rate of runoff volume was 63.04% and 55.21%, respectively. The peak flow was significantly decreased, and the peak time was delayed at least 24-30 min. The stepped ecological grass swale had good water quality control and pollution load reduction effect. The concentration reduction rates of SS, COD_Cr, NH₃-N, TN and TP in the runoff could reach 79.54%, 67.08%, 34.75%, 63.61% and 78.36%, respectively, and the reduction rates of the runoff volume could reach 92.44%, 87.83%, 74.29%, 84.45% and 90.31%, respectively. The effluent water quality was better than that of Class Ⅳ requirement of Environmental Quality Standards for Surface Water (GB 3838-2002). The stepped ecological grass swale could achieve better water quality control and pollution load reduction effect on road runoff, and thus had a good popularization and application value.
- stepped grass swale /
- aluminium sludge /
- runoff control /
- concentration reduction /
- runoff volume reduction

HTML全文

参考文献(21)

[1]	冯玉启, 王文海, 李俊奇, 等. 植草沟专用堰的设计与率定研究[J]. 环境工程, 2019, 37(7):30-33. FENG Y Q, WANG W H, LI J Q, et al. Design and its calibration of special turtles for grassing ditch[J]. Environmental Engineering, 2019, 37(7):30-33.
[2]	范钦栋, 季晋皛. 海绵城市理念下道路植草沟植物的选择:以西咸新区为例[J]. 环境工程, 2019, 37(7):47-51. FAN Q D, JI J J. Plant selection of grass swales in road greening of sponge city construction:a case study of Xixian New District in China[J]. Environmental Engineering, 2019, 37(7):47-51.
[3]	周开壹, 高伏良, 胡跃华, 等. 基于多孔混凝土的植草沟(GP水沟)降污能力研究[J]. 给水排水, 2011, 47(增刊1):269-274.
[4]	黄俊杰, 沈庆然, 李田. 植草沟控制道路径流污染效果的现场实验研究[J]. 环境科学, 2015, 36(6):2109-2115. doi: 10.1021/es011246m HUANG J J, SHEN Q R, LI T. Performance of grass swales for controlling pollution of roadway runoff in field experiments[J]. Environmental Science, 2015, 36(6):2109-2115. doi: 10.1021/es011246m
[5]	STAGGE J H, DAVIS A P, JAMIL E, et al. Performance of grass swales for improving water quality from highway runoff[J]. Water Research, 2012, 46(20):6731-6742. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.02.037
[6]	STAGGE J H, DAVIS A P, JAMIL E, et al. Hydraulic performance of grass swales for managing highway runoff[J]. Water Research, 2012, 46(20):6775-6786. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.10.017
[7]	张瑞斌, 奚道国, 王乐阳, 等. A/O+铝污泥填料人工湿地组合工艺处理农村生活污水的效果[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2019, 9(2):145-150. ZHANG R B, XI D G, WANG L Y, et al. Effect of A/O+aluminum sludge filled constructed wetland combined process on rural domestic sewage[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2019, 9(2):145-150.
[8]	BABATUNDE A O, ZHAO Y Q. Constructive approaches toward water treatment works sludge management:an international review of beneficial reuses[J]. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 2007, 37(2):129-164. doi: 10.1080/10643380600776239
[9]	黄俊杰, 沈庆然, 李田. 植草沟对道路径流的水文控制效果研究[J]. 中国给水排水, 2016, 32(3):118-122. HUANG J J, SHEN Q R, LI T. Study on hydrological effect of grass swales on road runoff[J]. China Water & Wastewater, 2016, 32(3):118-122.
[10]	申红彬, 徐宗学, 张勤, 等. 植草沟径流颗粒污染物削减效应监测与相关性分析[J]. 北京师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 55(5):641-647. SHEN H B, XU Z X, ZHANG Q, et al. Reduction of runoff-sediment-pollutants and correlation analysis in grass swale[J]. Journal of Beijing Normal University(Natural Science), 2019, 55(5):641-647.
[11]	孟莹莹, 陈茂福, 张书函. 植草沟滞蓄城市道路雨水的试验及模拟[J]. 水科学进展, 2018, 29(5):636-644. MENG Y Y, CHEN M F, ZHANG S H. Experiment and simulation of the vegetative swale to control road stormwater[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2018, 29(5):636-644.
[12]	张鸿敏. 植被过滤带对非点源污染物的净化效果及机理分析[D]. 西安: 西北大学, 2017.
[13]	巨龙, 耿雅妮, 任雪盈, 等. 铝污泥对磷的吸附动力学机制及其影响因素[J]. 江西农业学报, 2017, 29(11):87-90. JU L, GENG Y N, REN X Y, et al. Kinetics mechanism and influencing factors of phosphorus adsorption by aluminum sludge[J]. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2017, 29(11):87-90.
[14]	马宏娟, 赵晓红, 李伟, 等. 铝污泥吸附水中磷的影响因素及响应面法优化[J]. 人民长江, 2019(5):30-35. MA H J, ZHAO X H, LI W, et al. Influential factors on adsorption of phosphorus in water by aluminum sludge and experiment optimization by response surface methodology[J]. Yangtze River, 2019(5):30-35.
[15]	张辰. 植草沟对雨水径流量及径流污染控制研究[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2019.
[16]	荆武, 邬长友, 张辰, 等. 典型植草沟对武汉雨水径流污染的控制效果研究[J]. 市政技术, 2019, 37(5):227-230.
[17]	阮华珍, 高章龙, 陈玉婷, 等. 共存钙离子对镧铝改性稻壳生物炭除磷性能的影响[J]. 环境化学, 2020, 39(5):1279-1289. RUAN H Z, GAO Z L, CHEN Y T, et al. Effect of coexisting calcium ions on phosphate removal performance of lanthanum and aluminum modified rice husk biochar[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2020, 39(5):1279-1289.
[18]	穆丹琳. 城市给水厂污泥特性调研及调理实验研究[D]. 西安: 西安建筑科技大学, 2015.
[19]	BABATUNDE A O, ZHAO Y Q.Forms, patterns and extractability of phosphorus retained in alum sludge used as substrate in laboratory-scale constructed wetland systems[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2009, 152(1):8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2009.03.020
[20]	张瑞斌. 不同水生植物对污水处理厂尾水的生态净化效果分析[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2015, 5(6):504-508. ZHANG R B. Ecological purification efficiency of several aquatic plants on tail water of sewage treatment plant[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2015, 5(6):504-508.
[21]	吴鹏, 付永胜, 彭勃, 等. 植被过滤带阻控农业径流污染特性与机制进展[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2018, 41(2):91-101. WU P, FU Y S, PENG B, et al. Advances on characteristics and mechanism of vegetative filter strips intercepting agricultural runoff pollution[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2018, 41(2):91-101.