基于五元联系数法的辽河保护区沈阳段河流健康评价

李海霞; 王育鹏; 徐笠; 冯娜娜; 蔚青

doi:10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20200035

基于五元联系数法的辽河保护区沈阳段河流健康评价

doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20200035

李海霞^1,2,,
王育鹏^1,*, ,,
徐笠^2,3,
冯娜娜²,
蔚青^2,3

1.
安徽农业大学资源与环境学院
2.
北京市农林科学院,北京农业质量标准与检测技术研究中心
3.
农产品产地环境监测北京市重点实验室

详细信息

作者简介:
李海霞(1990—),女,硕士研究生,主要从事河流健康评价研究,1692337437@qq.com

通讯作者:
王育鹏 E-mail: 554196007@qq.com

中图分类号: X826
计量
- 文章访问数: 409
- HTML全文浏览量: 125
- PDF下载量: 95
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-02-28
- 刊出日期: 2020-07-20

River health evaluation in Shenyang Section of Liaohe Conservation Area based on five-element relation number method

LI Haixia^{1,2
,},
WANG Yupeng^{1,*
, ,},
XU Li^2,3,
FENG Nana²,
YU Qing^2,3

1.
School of Resources and Environment, Anhui Agricultural University
2.
Beijing Research Center for Agricultural Standards and Testing, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences
3.
Beijing Municipal Key Laboratory of Agriculture Environment Monitoring

More Information

Corresponding author: WANG Yupeng E-mail: 554196007@qq.com

摘要

摘要: 五元联系数法是针对系统中不确定因素,利用各因素之间的对立性、差异性及同一性对各因素进行系统分析的方法。针对五元联系数法可以同时考虑河流健康评价中的确定与不确定因素的优点,以辽河保护区沈阳段为例,建立了包含河流自然形态状况、水质状况、底质状况、水生生物及生态环境状况、社会服务状况五大类共24个指标的指标体系,以层次分析法确定权重,构建了五元联系数综合评价模型,对辽河保护区沈阳段河流健康状况进行评价。结果表明:辽河保护区沈阳段河流健康评价的五元联系数为0.576 8,河流健康等级为中等,其中,河流自然形态状况最大联系数为0.932 9,评价等级为中等;水质状况最大联系数为0.550 4,评价等级为不健康;底质状况最大联系数为0.920 9,评价等级为优秀;水生生物及生态环境状况最大联系数为0.781 3,评价等级为良好;社会服务状况最大联系数为0.478 3,评价等级为中等。辽河保护区沈阳段底质重金属污染较轻,但存在河床稳定性较差,水体氮、磷污染较为严重,鱼类多样性不高等问题,建议通过严格控制污水排放,强化水资源管理,提高化肥利用率,加强河岸带修复等措施,进一步加强保护区的治理与管理。
- 河流健康 /
- 五元联系数 /
- 评价体系 /
- 辽河保护区沈阳段
Abstract: The five-element connection number (FECN) method is a systematic analysis method for the uncertain factors in the system by using the opposition, difference and identity of each factor to analyze the factors. In view of the advantages of the FECN, which could simultaneously consider the certainty and uncertainty factors in the river health evaluation, an index system of 24 indicators in five categories including the river’s natural morphology, water quality, sediment, aquatic organisms and ecological environment, and social services was established in the case of Shenyang Section of Liaohe Conservation Area. By using analytic hierarchy process to determine the weight, a comprehensive evaluation model of five-element relation number was constructed to evaluate the river health in Shenyang Section of Liaohe Conservation Area. The results showed that the FECN of river health evaluation in Shenyang Section of Liaohe Conservation Area was 0.576 8, and the river health grade was medium. Among them, the connection number of river natural morphology was 0.932 9, and the evaluation level was medium. The connection number of water quality was 0.550 4, and the evaluation level was unhealthy. The connection number of sediment condition was 0.920 9, and the evaluation level was excellent. The connection number of aquatic organisms and ecological environment was 0.781.3, and the evaluation level was good. The connection number of social services was 0.478 3, and the evaluation level was medium. The sediment heavy metal pollution in Shenyang Section of Liaohe Conservation Area was relatively light, but the riverbed stability was poor, the water nitrogen and phosphorus pollution were serious, and the fish diversity was not high. It is suggested that the treatment and management of the reserve should be further strengthened by strictly controlling the discharge of sewage, strengthening the management of water resources, improving the utilization rate of chemical fertilizer, and strengthening the restoration of riparian zone, etc.
- river health /
- the five-element connection number /
- evaluation system /
- Shenyang Section of Liaohe Conservation Area

HTML全文

参考文献(32)

[1]	粟一帆, 李卫明, 艾志强, 等. 汉江中下游生态系统健康评价指标体系构建及其应用[J]. 生态学报, 2019,39(11):3895-3907. doi: 10.5846/stxb201807081484 SU Y F, LI W M, AI Z Q, et al. Establishment and application of the index system for health assessment of the middle and lower reaches of the Hanjiang River[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019,39(11):3895-3907. doi: 10.5846/stxb201807081484
[2]	胡青坤. 辽河流域的河流健康评价[J]. 水利技术监督, 2019(3):189-192. HU Q K. River health assessment in Liaohe River Basin[J]. Technical Supervision in Water Resources, 2019(3):189-192.
[3]	罗火钱, 李轶博, 刘华斌. 河流健康评价体系研究综述[J]. 水利科技, 2019(1):14-20. LUO H Q, LI Y B, LIU H B. Summary of research on river health assessment system[J]. Hydraulic Science and Technology, 2019(1):14-20.
[4]	匡舒雅, 李天宏. 五元联系数在长江下游生态航道评价中的应用[J]. 南水北调与水利科技, 2018,16(5):93-101. KUANG S Y, LI T H. Application of five-element connection number to assessment of ecological waterway in the lower reaches of Yangtze River[J]. South-to-North Water Transfers and Water Science & Technology, 2018,16(5):93-101.
[5]	段蕾, 李林峰. 集对分析法在河流健康评价中的应用[J]. 治淮, 2018(12):86-87.
[6]	孙博, 孟晓路. 辽河沈阳段“一河一策”治理及管理保护方案研究[J]. 水利规划与设计, 2019(2):20-23. SUN B, MENG X L. Study on “one river and one policy” control and management protection scheme in Shenyang Section of Liaohe River[J]. Water Resources Planning and Design, 2019(2):20-23.
[7]	王允妹. 辽河沈阳段污染治理及生态恢复进程回顾[J]. 科技创新导报, 2015,12(30):156-158. WANG Y M. Review on environment pollution control and ecological restoration of Liaohe River in Shenyang[J]. Science and Technology Innovation Herald, 2015,12(30):156-158.
[8]	李海霞, 韩丽花, 徐笠, 等. 基于灰色关联分析法的辽河保护区河流水生态健康评价[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2020,10(4):553-561. LI, H X, HAN L H, XU L, et al. Assessment on the water ecosystem heath of river based on grey correlation analysis in Liaohe Conservation Area[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2020,10(4):553-561.
[9]	LI T H, DING Y, XIA W. An integrated method for waterway health assessment: a case in the Jingjiang reach of the Yangtze River,China[J]. Physical Geography, 2018,39(1):67-83. doi: 10.1080/02723646.2017.1345537
[10]	陆海田. 河流健康评价指标权重分析[J]. 水资源开发与管理, 2018(9):14-18. LU H T. Weight analysis of river health evaluation index[J]. Water Resources Development and Management, 2018(9):14-18.
[11]	宋丽婧, 魏琛, 李丹阳, 等. 清水江水质评价与变化趋势的显著性分析研究[J]. 环境科学与管理, 2014,39(12):174-177. SONG L J, WEI C, LI D Y, et al. Water quality evaluation and trend significance analysis of Qingshuijiang River[J]. Environmental Science and Management, 2014,39(12):174-177.
[12]	田野. 黄河内蒙古段河流健康评价[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学, 2016.
[13]	祁泽慧. 大汶河流域水生态系统评价与水生态文明建设研究[D]. 济南:济南大学, 2017.
[14]	KE X, GUI S, HUANG H, et al. Ecological risk assessment and source identification for heavy metals in surface sediment from the Liaohe River Protected Area,China[J]. Chemosphere, 2017,175:473-481. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.02.029
[15]	殷灵军. 太子河流域河流健康综合评价[J]. 黑龙江水利科技, 2019,47(8):205-209. YIN L J. Comprehensive evaluation of river healthy in Taizi River Basin[J]. Heilongjiang Hydraulic Science and Technology, 2019,47(8):205-209.
[16]	傅春, 李云翊. 基于层次分析的抚河抚州段河流健康综合评价[J]. 南昌大学学报(工科版), 2017,39(1):1-7. FU C, LI Y Y. Comprehensive assessment of river health of Fuzhou Section of the Fuhe River based on analytic hierarchy process[J]. Journal of Nanchang University (Engineering & Technology), 2017,39(1):1-7.
[17]	宗福哲. 辽河流域水生态健康评价[D]. 沈阳:辽宁大学, 2017.
[18]	陈兰洲, 陶可, 赵剑, 等. 广水河河流水质调查及健康评价[J]. 中南民族大学学报(自然科学版), 2019,38(1):56-62. CHEN L Z, TAO K, ZHAO J, et al. The river water quality investigation and health assessment of Guangshui River[J]. Journal of South-Central University for Nationalities (Natural Science Edition), 2019,38(1):56-62.
[19]	石宁宁. 徐州市主要河流健康评价研究[D]. 扬州:扬州大学, 2018.
[20]	郭昱. 权重确定方法综述[J]. 农村经济与科技, 2018,29(8):252-253.
[21]	高卓, 何鑫, 胡祖芳, 等. 层次分析法在生态系统健康评价指标体系中的应用[J]. 中央民族大学学报(自然科学版), 2017,26(1):61-66. GAO Z, HE X, HU Z F, et al. Application of AHP in evaluation index system of ecosystem health[J]. Journal of Minzu University of China (Natural Sciences Edition), 2017,26(1):61-66.
[22]	王慧, 毛晓敏, 尚松浩, 等. 五元联系数在黄河健康评价中的应用[J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 2010,21(1):1-4. WANG H, MAO X M, SHANG S H, et al. Application of five-element connection number to health evaluation of the Yellow River[J]. Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering, 2010,21(1):1-4.
[23]	王冰洁, 刘朋钢, 杨海龙, 等. 北京山区河流自然性评价系统及其应用[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2015,13(4):67-73. WANG B J, LIU P G, YANG H L, et al. Naturalness evaluation system of rivers in Beijing mountainous areas and its application[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2015,13(4):67-73.
[24]	王志刚. 北京北部山区河流健康评价及其诊断研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2016.
[25]	王树才. 基于ELM算法的辽河沈阳段水污染评价[J]. 水利科技与经济, 2017,23(10):47-50. WANG S C. Assessment of water pollution for Liaohe River in Shenyang Section[J]. Water Conservancy Science and Technology and Economy, 2017,23(10):47-50.
[26]	曹小磊, 荆勇, 赵玉强, 等. 辽河沈阳段水质现状及面源污染特征分析[J]. 水电能源科学, 2018,36(2):43-46. CAO X L, JING Y, ZHAO Y Q, et al. Analysis of water quality and non-point source pollution characteristics of Liaohe River in Shenyang[J]. Water Resources and Power, 2018,36(2):43-46.
[27]	HE Y, MENG W, XU J, et al. Spatial distribution and toxicity assessment of heavy metals in sediments of Liaohe River,Northeast China[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2015,22(19):14960-14970. doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-4632-2 pmid: 26002359
[28]	ARENAS-SÁNCHEZ A, RICO A, VIGHI M. Effects of water scarcity and chemical pollution in aquatic ecosystems:state of the art[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2016,572:390-403. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.211 pmid: 27513735
[29]	SABATER S, BARCELÓ D, de CASTRO-CATALÁ N, et al. Shared effects of organic microcontaminants and environmental stressors on biofilms and invertebrates in impaired rivers[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2016,210:303-314. pmid: 26803786
[30]	IOANNIS K, CHRISTOS T, LEONIDAS V, et al. A review of the effects of pollution and water scarcity on the stream biota of an intermittent Mediterranean Basin[J]. River Research & Applications, 2018,34(4):291-299.
[31]	朱伟. 城镇化影响下的辽河干流沈阳段生态恢复策略研究[D]. 沈阳:沈阳建筑大学, 2013.
[32]	蔚青, 李巧玲, 段亮, 等. 辽河保护区铁岭段河流健康综合评价研究[J]. 水利水电技术, 2019,50(1):134-141. YU Q, LI Q L, DUAN L, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of river health of Liaohe Nature Reserve in Tieling Section[J]. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 2019,50(1):134-141.