间歇式厌氧折流板反应器处理分散养猪冲洗水的影响因素

沈志强; 马晓蕾; 董婧; 肖宇; 周岳溪; 武福平

doi:10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20190219

间歇式厌氧折流板反应器处理分散养猪冲洗水的影响因素

doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20190219

沈志强^1,2,,
马晓蕾³,
董婧⁴,
肖宇^1,5,
周岳溪^2,*, ,,
武福平⁵

1.
中国环境科学研究院环境污染控制工程技术研究中心
2.
环境基准与风险评估国家重点实验室,中国环境科学研究院
3.
中国标准化研究院
4.
北京市环境保护科学研究院
5.
兰州交通大学环境与市政工程学院

详细信息

作者简介:
沈志强(1983—),男,副研究员,博士,主要研究方向为水污染控制技术,shenzq@craes.org.cn

通讯作者:
周岳溪 E-mail: zhouyuexi@263.net

中图分类号: X703
计量
- 文章访问数: 351
- HTML全文浏览量: 107
- PDF下载量: 84
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2019-12-26
- 刊出日期: 2020-09-20

Influencing factors of sequencing batch anaerobic baffle reactor for the treatment of disperse piggery washing wastewater

SHEN Zhiqiang^{1,2
,},
MA Xiaolei³,
DONG Jing⁴,
XIAO Yu^1,5,
ZHOU Yuexi^{2,*
, ,},
WU Fuping⁵

1.
Research Center of Environmental Pollution Control Engineering Technology, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences
2.
State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences
3.
China National Institute of Standardization
4.
Beijing Municipal Research Institute of Environmental Protection
5.
School of Environmental and Municipal Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University

More Information

Corresponding author: ZHOU Yuexi E-mail: zhouyuexi@263.net

摘要

摘要: 针对分散养猪冲洗水间歇产生的特点,采用间歇式厌氧折流板反应器(ABR,装置B)对其进行处理,考察COD负荷、冲洗次数、进水时间和温度对处理性能的影响,并与连续运行ABR(装置A)进行对比。结果表明:与进水COD相比,装置B对进水量更敏感,且其能承受的COD负荷较装置A低,但在平均COD负荷分别为1.03、2.06、1.39和1.82 kg/(m³·d)时,对应的COD平均去除率分别为76.2%、77.3%、86.0%和85.4%;增加冲洗次数至每天2次,有利于提升装置B的处理能力;延长进水时间至2 h,对装置B的处理性能没有影响;低温严重影响ABR的性能,温度降至15 ℃以下时,装置B对COD的平均去除率由17 ℃时的75.8%降至60.0%。
- 厌氧折流板反应器(ABR) /
- 分散养猪冲洗水 /
- 间歇运行 /
- COD负荷 /
- 低温
Abstract: The sequencing batch anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR, device B) was studied for treating washing wastewater of scattered piggery for its feather of intermittent discharge. The effects of COD load, washing times, influent time and temperature on the treatment performance of device B were investigated and compared with continuous operation ABR (device A). The results showed that device B was more sensitive to influent water rather than influent COD. Compared with device A, device B could afford lower COD load, while the removal rate of COD was 76.2%, 77.3%, 86.0% and 85.4%, when the average COD load was 1.03, 2.06, 1.39 and 1.82 kg/(m³·d),respectively. The treatment capacity of SB-ABR was improved by increasing the washing times to twice a day, while it had no influence by prolonging the influent time to 2 h. The performance of ABR could be seriously influenced by low temperature. The removal of COD by SB-ABR decreased from 75.8% to 60.0%, when the temperature fell from 17 ℃ to 15 ℃.
- anaerobic baffled reactor(ABR) /
- dispersed piggery washing wastewater /
- batch operation /
- COD load /
- low temperature

HTML全文

参考文献(16)

[1]	HAN Z F, MIAO Y, DONG J, et al. Enhanced nitrogen removal and microbial analysis in partially saturated constructed wetland for treating anaerobically digested swine wastewater[J]. Front Environment Science and Engineering, 2019,13(4):52. doi: 10.1007/s11783-019-1133-4
[2]	LETINGA G, FIELD J, van LIER J, et al. Advanced anaerobic wastewater treatment in the near future[J]. Water Science and Technology, 1997,35(10):5-12. doi: 10.2166/wst.1997.0347
[3]	赵丽, 陈晴, 王毅力. ABR处理模拟畜禽养殖废水中有机物的快速启动与运行优化研究[J]. 环境工程学报, 2017,11(7):3943-3951. ZHAO L, CHEN Q, WANG Y L. Study on quick start-up and operation optimization of anaerobic baffled reactor(ABR) treating synthetic livestock wastewater[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2017,11(7):3943-3951.
[4]	JIANG M M, QIAO W, REN Z R, et al. Influence of operation conditions on methane production from swine wastewater treated by a self-agitation anaerobic reactor[J]. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation.doi: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2019.05.027. pmid: 11541393
[5]	聂丽君, 李德豪, 何京东, 等. ABR-MAP-MBR组合工艺处理高浓度养殖废水研究[J]. 化工学报, 2018,69(6):2722-2729. NIE L J, LI D H, HE J D, et al. Treatment of high concentration piggery wastewater by ABR-MAP-MBR process[J]. CIESC Journal, 2018,69(6):2722-2729.
[6]	陈晴, 王毅力, 赵丽, 等. ABR-MABR耦合工艺处理畜禽养殖废水的同步启动[J]. 环境科学研究, 2016,30(2):298-305. CHEN Q, WANG Y L, ZHAO L, et al. Synchronous start-up of anaerobic baffled reactor-membrane biofilm bioreactor(ABR-MABR) coupling process treating synthetic livestock and poultry wastewater[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2016,30(2):298-305.
[7]	赵金安, 雷英春. ABR反应器处理畜禽养殖废水中厌氧污泥颗粒化的研究[J]. 中北大学学报(自然科学版), 2015,36(1):75-79. ZHAO J A, LEI Y C. Granulation of anaerobic sludge in anaerobic baffled reactor treating livestock wastewater[J]. Journal of North University of China (Natural Science Edition), 2015,36(1):75-79.
[8]	HAN Z F, DONG J, SHEN Z Q, et al. Nitrogen removal of anaerobically digested swine wastewater by pilot-scale tidal flow constructed wetland based on in-situ biological regeneration of zeolite[J]. Chemosphere, 2019,217:364-373. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.11.036 pmid: 30419390
[9]	肖宇, 沈志强, 周岳溪, 等. 厌氧折流板反应器对分散养猪冲洗水有机物去除特性研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2015,34(10):2004-2011. XIAO Y, SHEN Z Q, ZHOU Y X, et al. Removal of organics in scattered piggery washing wastewater by anaerobic baffled reactor[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2015,34(10):2004-2011.
[10]	国家环境保护总局. 水和废水监测分析方法[M].4版. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2002.
[11]	孙蔚旻. 厌氧折流板反应器启动及其微生物群落研究[D]. 武汉:华中科技大学, 2005.
[12]	刘忠强. 有机负荷对ABR性能及其颗粒污泥的影响[D]. 大连:大连理工大学, 2006.
[13]	陈俊杰. ABR处理农村生活污水的试验研究[D]. 成都:西南交通大学, 2008.
[14]	NACHAIYASIT S, STUCKEY D C. The effect of low temperature on the performance of an anaerobic baffled reactor(ABR)[J]. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, 1997,69:276-284.
[15]	LANGENHOFF A A M, STUCKEY D C. Treatment of dilute wastewater using an anaerobic baffled reactor:effect of low temperature[J]. Water Research, 2000,34(15):3867-3875. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00136-6
[16]	张冰. 温度降低对产甲烷效能的影响及培养条件优化[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学, 2011.