基于全过程管理的生态环境保护第三方考核模式构建及应用

谢琼; 付青; 汪星; 殷雪妍; 赵喜亮

doi:10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.2019.06.280

基于全过程管理的生态环境保护第三方考核模式构建及应用

doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.2019.06.280

谢琼^1,2,
付青^1,2,
汪星^1,2,
殷雪妍^1,2,
赵喜亮^1,2

^1. 湖泊水污染治理与生态修复技术国家工程实验室,中国环境科学研究院,北京 100012
^2. 国家环境保护饮用水水源地保护重点实验室,中国环境科学研究院,北京 100012

详细信息

作者简介:
谢琼(1985—),女,助理研究员,研究方向为饮用水水源污染控制与应急管理, 151713324@qq.com

中图分类号: X32
计量
- 文章访问数: 338
- HTML全文浏览量: 82
- PDF下载量: 84
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2019-05-06
- 刊出日期: 2019-11-20

Construction and application of third-party assessment model for eco-environmental protection based on whole-process management

XIE Qiong^1,2,
FU Qing^1,2,
WANG Xing^1,2,
YIN Xueyan^1,2,
ZHAO Xiliang^1,2

^1. National Engineering Laboratory for Lake Pollution Control and Ecological Restoration, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
^2. State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Drinking Water Source Protection, Beijing 100012, China

摘要

摘要: 针对目前生态环境保护考核体系未将生态环境保护责任追究办法和污染防治攻坚战顶层设计纳入考核体系,考核指标存在污染减排与环境质量改善不同步,考核结果的应用只涉及暂时的排名,未针对考核发现的不足进行溯源等问题,通过对考核主体及对象、考核内容及指标、考核方式和结果的分析,结合湖北省十堰市特点,提出了其考核对象主要涉及三大部门;构建了包括环境质量,环境保护政策、规划与项目实施,生态环境主管部门,污染源监督管理,排污主体5类共42项指标的生态环境保护考核指标体系;提出其生态环境保护考核中环境质量和管理的评分办法,具体的考核方法及流程等,形成十堰市生态环境保护第三方考核模式。该考核模式的应用结果表明:2017年十堰市各县(市、区)4个季度考核得分均呈上升趋势,第三方考核对地方生态环境保护工作起到良好促进作用,提升了环境管理水平,促进了环境质量的稳定与改善。
- 第三方考核 /
- 生态环境 /
- 考核指标 /
- 考核对象
Abstract: There are some problems in current assessment system of eco-environmental protection. e.g. the accountability for environmental protection and the top-level design of the Tough Battle against Pollution haven not been considered into the assessment system of eco-environmental protection, the assessment indicators are not synchronized with the improvement of pollution reduction and environmental quality, the results of assessment are only applied into temporary ranking and have not be used to trace the source of the deficiencies found in the assessment. Aiming at these problems, based on the analysis of assessment subjects and objects, contents and indicators, methods and results, and combined with the specialties of Shiyan City, Hubei Province, a third-party assessment model for eco-environment protection was constructed for the city. It was proposed that the assessment objects mainly involve three departments, and the assessment system with 42 indicators was established, including environmental quality, environmental protection policies, planning, project implementation, environmental authorities, supervision and management of pollution sources, and pollutant discharge bodies. The scoring method of environmental quality and management, as well as the specific assessment method and process in eco-environmental protection assessment were put forward. The application results of the assessment model showed that in 2017, the assessment scores of all counties and districts in Shiyan City presented an upward trend in four quarters. The third-party assessment had played a good role in promoting local environmental protection work, improving the level of environmental management, and promoting the stability and improvement of environmental quality.
- third-party assessment /
- eco-environmental protection /
- assessment indicators /
- assessment objects

HTML全文

参考文献(18)

[1]	包国宪, 曹西安 . 我国地方政府绩效评价的回顾与模式分析[J]. 兰州大学学报(社会科学版), 2007,35(1):34-39.
[2]	曹东, 宋存义, 曹颖 , 等. 国外开展环境绩效评估的情况及对我国的启示[J]. 价值工程, 2008,27(10):7-12. CAO D, SONG C Y, CAO Y , et al. Overseas experience about environmental performance assessment and inspiration for China[J]. Value Engineering, 2008,27(10):7-12.
[3]	曹颖, 曹东 . 中国环境绩效评估指标体系和评估方法研究[J]. 环境保护, 2008(14):36-38.
[4]	王金南, 蒋洪强 . 国家“十二五”环境保护规划体系与重点任务[J]. 环境保护, 2012(1):51-55.
[5]	徐双敏 . 政府绩效管理中的"第三方评估"模式及其完善[J]. 中国行政管理, 2011,12(1):50-52.
[6]	常纪文 . 党政同责、一岗双责、失职追责:环境保护的重大体制、制度和机制创新:《党政领导干部生态环境损害责任追究办法(试行)》之解读[J]. 环境保护, 2015,43(21):12-16. CHANG J W . Major innovation of environmental protection system,institution and mechanism:analysis on "measures for investigating the responsibility of environmental damage of party and government leading cadres"[J]. Environmental Protection, 2015,43(21):12-16.
[7]	YOUNG O R, DAN G, YE Q , et al. Institutionalized governance processes:comparing environmental problem solving in China and the United States[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2015,31:163-173.
[8]	李萱 . 抓住历史机遇完善环保考核[J].环境保护, 2011(10):12-15.
[9]	AGENCY E E . The European environment-state and outlook 2015:synjournal report[J]. Classical Review, 2015,62(3/4):129-130.
[10]	BALEŽENTIS T, LI T, STREIMIKIENE D , et al. Is the Lithuanian economy approaching the goals of sustainable energy and climate change mitigation?evidence from DEA-based environmental performance index[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016,116:23-31.
[11]	PÖLÖNEN I, HOKKANEN P, JALAVA K . The effectiveness of the Finnish EIA system:what works,what doesn't,and what could be improved?[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2011,31(2):120-128.
[12]	FUJIA L I, DONG S, ZEHONG L I , et al. The improvement of CO₂ emission reduction policies based on system dynamics method in traditional industrial region with large CO₂ emission[J]. Energy Policy, 2012,51:683-695.
[13]	PRICE L, LEVINE M D, NAN Z , et al. Assessment of China's energy-saving and emission-reduction accomplishments and opportunities during the 11th Five Year Plan[J]. Energy Policy, 2011,39(4):2165-2178.
[14]	SCHREIFELS J J, FU Y, WILSON E J . Sulfur dioxide control in China: policy evolution during the 10th and 11th Five-year Plans and lessons for the future[J]. Energy Policy, 2012,48(3):779-789.
[15]	李子豪 . 公众参与对地方政府环境治理的影响:2003—2013年省际数据的实证分析[J]. 中国行政管理, 2017(8):102-108. LI Z H. The impact of public participation on local government's environmental governance:an analysis of provincial data 2003-2013[J]. Chinese Public Administration, 2017(8):102-108.
[16]	NEWIG J, FRITSCH O, RAUSCHMAYER F , et al. Environmental governance:participatory,multi-level-and effective[J]. Environmental Policy & Governance, 2010,19(3):197-214.
[17]	杨婧, 汪涛, 任思靖 , 等. 开展第三方环境保护综合考核的地方实践及其借鉴[J]. 环境保护, 2017,45(21):59-60. YANG J, WANG T, REN S J , et al. Practice and reference of comprehensive assessment implemented by a third party for Qingyuan Environmental Protection Performance[J]. Environmental Protection, 2017,45(21):59-60.
[18]	吴建南, 徐萌萌, 马艺源 . 环保考核、公众参与和治理效果:来自31个省级行政区的证据[J]. 中国行政管理, 2016(9):75-81.