Volume 14 Issue 2
Mar.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
CHEN K,ZHOU J,NIE C X,et al.Quantitative effect evaluation on dust control measures of construction sites[J].Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2024,14(2):437-445 doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20230639
Citation: CHEN K,ZHOU J,NIE C X,et al.Quantitative effect evaluation on dust control measures of construction sites[J].Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2024,14(2):437-445 doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20230639

Quantitative effect evaluation on dust control measures of construction sites

doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20230639
  • Received Date: 2023-09-04
  • Accepted Date: 2023-10-31
  • Rev Recd Date: 2023-09-22
  • With the urban planning and construction, large-scale construction projects have produced amounts of atmospheric pollutants represented by coarse particulate matter (PM10) in the process of foundation excavation, main construction and exterior wall decoration. In order to minimize PM10 caused by dust at construction sites, relevant departments require to take dust suppression measures at construction sites such as bare soil covering, stereoscopic spraying and enclosure isolation. The dust suppression effect of each measure was explored based on the on-site dust suppression measure controlled experiments and high-precision numerical wind tunnel experiments. The results showed that PM10 concentration decreased by 5.1% when only using enclosure spraying, the concentration decreased by 12.3% when only using construction spraying, and when both measures were used, the concentration decreased by 11.4%. When the wind speed was high, the dust suppression effect of bare soil cover was more significant than that of low wind, and the mean PM10 concentration of bare soil cover under third-level wind (>2 m/s) was 10.7% lower than that without bare soil cover. PM10 concentration of bare soil spray decreased by 21.3% compared with that of no spray. On the whole, the dust reduction rates during the foundation excavation stage were 3.6%, 10.5%, 18.4% and 29.0% for enclosure heights of 2, 3, 4 and 5 m, respectively. In the main construction stage, the influence distance of dust diffusion gradually decreased with the increase of emission source. When the source height was 10 m, the maximum influence distance was 75 m outside the construction site; when the source height was 30m, the maximum influence distance was 50 m. When the source height was 50 and 90 m, the dust dissipation rate was less than 10% as soon as the dust source left the site, which means that the impact outside the site could be ignored.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    丁国梁. 建筑施工扬尘排放特征及建模研究[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2020.
    [2]
    范武波, 陈军辉, 唐斌雁, 等. 成都市施工扬尘排放特征研究[J]. 中国环境科学,2020,40(9):3767-3775. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2020.09.007

    FAN W B, CHEN J H, TANG B Y, et al. Dust emission characteristics of construction activities in Chengdu[J]. China Environmental Science,2020,40(9):3767-3775. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2020.09.007
    [3]
    谢志辉, 刘春琼, 史凯, 等. 成都市PM10对大气辐射环境的影响[J]. 环境科学研究,2016,29(7):972-977.

    XIE Z H, LIU C Q, SHI K. Impacts of PM10 on the radiation environments of the atmosphere in Chengdu City[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences,2016,29(7):972-977.
    [4]
    TAO G W, FENG J C, FENG H B, et al. Reducing construction dust pollution by planning construction site layout[J]. Buildings,2022,12(5):531. doi: 10.3390/buildings12050531
    [5]
    KALUARACHCHI M, WAIDYASEKARA A, RAMEEZDEEN R, et al. Mitigating dust pollution from construction activities: a behavioural control perspective[J]. Sustainability,2021,13(16):9005. doi: 10.3390/su13169005
    [6]
    赵向伟, 樊越胜, 司鹏飞, 等. 建筑室内外颗粒物污染特征研究[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2016,6(3):223-228.

    ZHAO X W, FAN Y S, SI P F, et al. Pollution characteristics of indoor and outdoor particulate of buildings[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2016,6(3):223-228.
    [7]
    AZAROV V, PETRENKO L, MANZHILEVSKAYA S. The study of local dust pollution of atmospheric air on construction sites in urban areas[M]//Advances in intelligent systems and computing. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019: 430-439.
    [8]
    ZHANG F, LU Y, WANG Y P, et al. Study on dust pollution law and chemical dust suppression technology of non hard pavement in urban construction sites[J]. Building and Environment,2023,229:109938. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109938
    [9]
    杨涛, 何友江, 刘怡, 等. 城市建筑工地扬尘污染扩散模拟研究[C]//中国环境科学学会2022年科学技术年会: 环境工程技术创新与应用分会场. 南昌: 中国环境科学学会, 2022: 485-491.
    [10]
    北京市住房和城乡建设委员会. 北京市建设工程扬尘治理综合监管实施方案(试行)[A/OL]. [2023-08-06]. https://www.beijing.gov.cn/zhengce/gfxwj/202203/t20220310_2627569.html.
    [11]
    上海市人民政府. 上海市建设工程文明施工管理规定[A/OL]. [2023-08-06]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2019-09/18/content_5724288.html.
    [12]
    浙江省住房和城乡建设厅. 浙江省建筑工地施工扬尘控制导则[A/OL]. [2023-08-06]. http://www.360doc.com/content/22/1125/21/78937503_1057566200.shtml.
    [13]
    杨小阳, 孟凡, 张懿璇, 等. 中韩扬尘污染防治法规及政策对比研究[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2017,7(6):739-745.

    YANG X Y, MENG F, ZHANG Y X, et al. Comparison study on regulations and policies of fugitive dust prevention and control between China and Korea[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2017,7(6):739-745.
    [14]
    王永敏, 高健, 徐仲均, 等. 光散射法与 β射线衰减-光散射联用法颗粒物在线测量方法对比[J]. 环境科学研究,2017,30(2):433-443.

    WANG Y M, GAO J, XU Z J, et al. Inter-comparison between light scattering and beta-attenuation-light scattering particulate matter on-line monitoring[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences,2017,30(2):433-443.
    [15]
    张涛, 金大建, 李蒙, 等. 施工扬尘污染监测与分析[J]. 中国环保产业,2023(1):63-72.

    ZHANG T, JIN D J, LI M, et al. Monitoring and analysis of fugitive dust pollution caused by construction sites[J]. China Environmental Protection Industry,2023(1):63-72.
    [16]
    张超. 建设工程施工阶段扬尘检测与控制研究[D]. 郑州: 华北水利水电大学, 2019.
    [17]
    闫辉, 吕希, 廉庆, 等. 建筑工地周边重点区域扬尘污染特征研究: 以广州市某建筑工地为例[J]. 工程管理学报,2022,36(3):125-130.

    YAN H, LÜ X, LIAN Q, et al. The pollution characteristics of dust in the key surrounding area of construction site: a case of construction site in Guangzhou[J]. Journal of Engineering Management,2022,36(3):125-130.
    [18]
    GIANNUZZI M. Low Reynolds turbulence model CFD simulation for complex electronic system: an industrial point of view[J]. Journal of Physics:Conference Series,2014,525:012002. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/525/1/012002
    [19]
    住房和城乡建设部. 建筑施工安全检查标准: JGJ 59—2011[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2012.
    [20]
    柯文捷. 建筑工地扬尘控制现状及对策分析: 以某大型棚户区改造项目为例[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2019.
    [21]
    杨波, 张玉会. 公路施工密目网覆盖法抑制扬尘机理分析[J]. 交通节能与环保,2019,15(4):66-68. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6478.2019.04.018

    YANG B, ZHANG Y H. Analysis of mechanism of dust control by dense mesh covering method in highway engineering construction[J]. Energy Conservation & Environmental Protection in Transportation,2019,15(4):66-68. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6478.2019.04.018
    [22]
    赵烨. 高烟囱排放与大气环境污染研究[J]. 山西科技,2018,33(3):78-80.

    ZHAO Y. Study on high chimney emission and air environmental pollution[J]. Shanxi Science and Technology,2018,33(3):78-80. □
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(12)  / Tables(1)

    Article Metrics

    Article Views(44) PDF Downloads(24) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return