Volume 14 Issue 2
Mar.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LIU Q G,ZHANG L Q,JI Y Q,et al.Research on the evaluation of low-carbon development level of industrial parks under carbon peak and carbon neutrality target: taking A park in East China as an example[J].Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2024,14(2):379-388 doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20230606
Citation: LIU Q G,ZHANG L Q,JI Y Q,et al.Research on the evaluation of low-carbon development level of industrial parks under carbon peak and carbon neutrality target: taking A park in East China as an example[J].Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2024,14(2):379-388 doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20230606

Research on the evaluation of low-carbon development level of industrial parks under carbon peak and carbon neutrality target: taking A park in East China as an example

doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20230606
  • Received Date: 2023-08-19
  • Accepted Date: 2023-12-28
  • Rev Recd Date: 2023-09-20
  • Available Online: 2024-02-02
  • Under the goal of carbon peak and carbon neutrality, the demand for low-carbon development of industrial parks is becoming more and more urgent. Scientific and reasonable evaluation of the low-carbon development level of industrial parks is a key step to promote the low-carbon development of industrial parks. From the five levels of low-carbon industry, energy resource utilization, pollution reduction and carbon reduction, low-carbon infrastructure, and long-term management, 24 indicators were selected to construct a low-carbon development evaluation index system for industrial parks. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) combined with the improved criteria importance through intercriteria correlation (CRITIC) method was used to assign weights to indicators, and the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) - grey correlation analysis model and obstacle degree model were used to analyze the low-carbon development level and obstacle factors of A park in East China from 2018 to 2022. The results showed that the low-carbon development level of A park was increasing year by year from 2018 to 2022, among which the low-carbon development trend of low-carbon industry, energy resource utilization and long-term management criteria was better, while the low-carbon development of pollution reduction and low-carbon infrastructure criteria was hindered. From the perspective of obstacle degree, pollution reduction and carbon reduction, and energy resource utilization in the criterion layer were the key obstacle factors restricting the improvement of the low-carbon development level of A park. Among them, the carbon emission per unit of industrial added value, the comprehensive energy consumption per unit of industrial added value, the reuse rate of industrial water, the wastewater discharge per unit of industrial added value, and the proportion of green buildings in new industrial buildings were more prominent.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    谢华生, 常文韬, 樊在义, 等. 生态工业园低碳发展的指标与途径[J]. 中国环保产业,2010(10):42-45. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5377.2010.10.010

    XIE H S, CHANG W T, FAN Z Y, et al. Indicators and approaches of low-carbon development in eco-industrial parks[J]. China Environmental Protection Industry,2010(10):42-45. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5377.2010.10.010
    [2]
    伍肆, 周宁, 王松林. 基于模糊评价集的工业园区低碳评价体系构建[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2013,23(增刊2):276-279.

    WU S, ZHOU N, WANG S L. Establishment of low-carbon industrial parks evaluation system by fuzzy comprehensive evaluation set[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment,2013,23(Suppl 2):276-279.
    [3]
    周娟. 低碳工业园区评价指标体系研究[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2013.
    [4]
    李晓静. 青岛市工业园区低碳发展评价与对策研究[D]. 青岛: 青岛科技大学, 2015.
    [5]
    马桂华. 广西工业园区低碳评价指标体系研究[D]. 南宁: 广西师范学院, 2017.
    [6]
    霍震. 江苏省低碳园区评价指标体系研究[J]. 中国资源综合利用,2018,36(8):108-110. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-9500.2018.08.036

    HUO Z. Explore the evaluation system of low-carbon industrial parks in Jiangsu Province[J]. China Resources Comprehensive Utilization,2018,36(8):108-110. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-9500.2018.08.036
    [7]
    LIU X, LIU H, CHEN J, et al. Evaluating the sustainability of marine industrial parks based on the dpsir framework[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2018,188:158-170. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.271
    [8]
    张明博, 于梓涵, 高照琴, 等. “两高”产业园区规划环境影响评价指标体系构建研究[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2022,12(6):1788-1795. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20220558

    ZHANG M B, YU Z H, GAO Z Q, et al. Development of the environmental impact assessment (EIA) index system for high-pollution and energy-intensive industrial park planning[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2022,12(6):1788-1795. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20220558
    [9]
    王晶晶. 武汉市低碳产业园区指标体系研究[D]. 武汉: 湖北工业大学, 2016.
    [10]
    郑倩婧. 低碳城市建设成熟度评价研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2018.
    [11]
    邢雅囡, 冯彬. 江苏省工业园区绿色发展评价方法及其应用[J]. 环境保护科学,2019,45(6):39-43.

    XING Y N, FENG B. An evaluation method and its application of green development for the industrial parks in Jiangsu Province[J]. Environmental Protection Science,2019,45(6):39-43.
    [12]
    熊向艳, 韩永伟, 孟晓杰, 等. 黄河流域国家生态文明建设示范区发展水平测度及其时空差异[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2023,13(4):1304-1314. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20220805

    XIONG X Y, HAN Y W, MENG X J, et al. Measurement of the development level and spatial-temporal differences of the National Ecological Civilization Construction Demonstration Areas in the Yellow River basin[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2023,13(4):1304-1314. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20220805
    [13]
    SUN F, LUO Y, SHEN J. Research on drainage rights allocation based on game combination weight-improved matter-element extension model[J]. Water,2023,15(11):2044. doi: 10.3390/w15112044
    [14]
    杨占斌, 徐亚. 建设项目对文物遗迹综合环境影响的组合赋权方法研究[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2019,9(3):320-324. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.2018.11.070

    YANG Z B, XU Y. A combination weighting method to evaluate the comprehensive environmental influence of construction project on cultural heritage[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2019,9(3):320-324. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.2018.11.070
    [15]
    向治锦, 张庆, 吕庆, 等. 锌冶炼用氧化锌富集物再生综合效益评价[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2022,12(4):1245-1252. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210441

    XIANG Z J, ZHANG Q, LÜ Q, et al. Comprehensive benefit evaluation of zinc oxide enrichment regeneration for zinc smelting[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2022,12(4):1245-1252. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210441
    [16]
    SHEN L, ZHANG Y, YAO M, et al. Combination weighting integrated with topsis for landscape performance evaluation: a case study of microlandscape from rural areas in southeast China[J]. Sustainability,2022,14(15):9794. doi: 10.3390/su14159794
    [17]
    杨敏慧, 袁培炎, 罗天烈, 等. 基于层次分析法评估长江上游宜宾段工业园区环境风险[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2022,12(2):624-632. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210683

    YANG H M, YUAN P Y, LUO T L, et al. Assessment of the environmental risk of the industrial parks of Yibin section of the upper reaches of the Yangtze River based on analytic hierarchy process[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2022,12(2):624-632. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210683
    [18]
    易文杰, 李庄, 罗竹燕, 等. 水泥行业环境影响评价低碳技术选择与应用[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2022,12(6):1905-1914. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20220590

    YI W J, LI Z, LUO Z Y, et al. Selection and application of low carbon technologies in environmental impact assessment of cement industry[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2022,12(6):1905-1914. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20220590
    [19]
    ROSTAMZADEH R, GHORABAEE M K, GOVINDAN K, et al. Evaluation of sustainable supply chain risk management using an integrated fuzzy topsis-critic approach[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2018,175:651-669. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.071
    [20]
    张立军, 张潇. 基于改进CRITIC法的加权聚类方法[J]. 统计与决策,2015(22):65-68.
    [21]
    刘淑茹, 魏晓晓. 基于改进CRITIC法的西部地区新型城镇化水平测度[J]. 生态经济,2019,35(7):98-102.

    LIU S R, WEI X X. Measurement of new urbanization level in western china based on improved CRITIC method[J]. Ecological Economy,2019,35(7):98-102.
    [22]
    刘传修, 张菁, 刘小康, 等. 基于IVIF-AHP与改进CRITIC法的配电网规划方案综合评估[J]. 控制工程,2022,29(2):322-329.

    LIU C X, ZHANG J, LIU X K, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of distribution network planning scheme based on IVIF-AHP and improved CRITIC method[J]. Control Engineering of China,2022,29(2):322-329.
    [23]
    李刚, 李建平, 孙晓蕾, 等. 主客观权重的组合方式及其合理性研究[J]. 管理评论,2017,29(12):17-26.

    LI G, LI J P, SUN X L, et al. Research on a combined method of subjective-objective weighing and the its rationality[J]. Management Review,2017,29(12):17-26.
    [24]
    李刚, 李建平, 孙晓蕾, 等. 兼顾序信息和强度信息的主客观组合赋权法研究[J]. 中国管理科学,2017,25(12):179-187.

    LI G, LI J P, SUN X L, et al. Research on a combined method of subjective-objective weighting based on the ordered information and intensity information[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science,2017,25(12):179-187.
    [25]
    阚剑锋, 蒋栋辉, 侯茂林, 等. 高铁车站新线引入施工与车站工作组织协同评价研究[J]. 中国铁路,2022(11):115-122.

    KAN J F, JIANG D H, HOU M L, et al. Research on synergetic evaluation of new line introduction and station operation organization of high speed railway station[J]. China Railway,2022(11):115-122.
    [26]
    黄亚江, 李书全, 项思思. 基于AHP-PSO模糊组合赋权法的地铁火灾安全韧性评估[J]. 灾害学,2021,36(3):15-20. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-811X.2021.03.004

    HUANG Y J, LI S Q, XIANG S S. Evaluation of subway fire safety resilience based on AHP-PSO fuzzy combination weighting method[J]. Journal of Catastrophology,2021,36(3):15-20. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-811X.2021.03.004
    [27]
    张群淑. 考虑全生命周期的深圳港绿色竞争力研究[D]. 大连: 大连海事大学, 2021.
    [28]
    DING L, SHAO Z, ZHANG H, et al. A comprehensive evaluation of urban sustainable development in China based on the topsis-entropy method[J]. Sustainability,2016,8(8):746. doi: 10.3390/su8080746
    [29]
    武春友, 郭玲玲, 于惊涛. 基于TOPSIS-灰色关联分析的区域绿色增长系统评价模型及实证[J]. 管理评论,2017,29(1):228-239.

    WU C Y, GUO L L, YU J T. Evaluation model and empirical study of regional green growth system based on TOPSIS and grey relational analysis[J]. Management Review,2017,29(1):228-239.
    [30]
    李海东, 王帅, 刘阳. 基于灰色关联理论和距离协同模型的区域协同发展评价方法及实证[J]. 系统工程理论与实践,2014,34(7):1749-1755. doi: 10.12011/1000-6788(2014)7-1749

    LI H D, WANG S, LIU Y. Evaluation method and empirical research of regional synergetic development degree based on grey relational theory and distance collaborative model[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice,2014,34(7):1749-1755. doi: 10.12011/1000-6788(2014)7-1749
    [31]
    李刚, 李双元, 平建硕. 基于改进熵值TOPSIS灰色关联度模型的青海省乡村振兴评价及障碍因子分析[J]. 中国农业资源与区划,2021,42(12):115-123.

    LI G, LI S Y, PING J S. Evaluation and obstacle factor analysis of rural revitalization in Qinghai Province based on improved entropy topsis gray correlayion model[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning,2021,42(12):115-123.
    [32]
    许杨, 陈菁, 夏欢, 等. 基于DPSR-改进TOPSIS模型的淮安市水资源承载力评价[J]. 水资源与水工程学报,2019,30(4):47-52.

    XU Y, CEHN J, XIA H. Evaluation of water resource carrying capacity in Huaian City based on DPSR- improved TOPSIS model[J]. Journal of Water Resources & Water Engineering,2019,30(4):47-52.
    [33]
    陈志霞, 徐杰. 基于TOPSIS与灰色关联分析的城市幸福指数评价[J]. 统计与决策,2021,37(9):59-62.
    [34]
    王利利, 贾梦雨, 韩松, 等. 基于TOPSIS-灰色关联度的农网投资效益与风险能力综合评价[J]. 电力科学与技术学报,2020,35(4):76-83.

    WANG L L, JIA M Y, HAN S, et al. Synthesized evaluation of investment efficiency and risk ability of rural network based on TOPSIS-gray incidence[J]. Journal of Electric Power Science and Technology,2020,35(4):76-83.
    [35]
    刘启君, 黄旻, 宋艺欣, 等. 基于灰色关联TOPSIS模型的武汉市环境承载力评价及障碍因子诊断[J]. 生态经济,2016,32(5):191-195. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4407.2016.05.038

    LIU Q J, HUANG M, SONG Y X, et al. Evaluation on environmental carrying capacity of Wuhan City based on the gray correlation TOPSIS method and diagnosis of its obstacle indicators[J]. Ecological Economy,2016,32(5):191-195. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4407.2016.05.038
    [36]
    乐晖, 金文龙, 陈亢利. 长三角地区生态承载力评价: 以苏州市为例[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2023,13(2):725-732. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210654

    YUE H, JIN W L, CHEN K L. Evaluation of ecological carrying capacity in Yangtze River Delta: a case study of Suzhou City[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2023,13(2):725-732. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210654
    [37]
    徐志青, 刘雪瑜, 肖书虎, 等. 珠江三角洲地区水环境承载力评价及障碍因素研究[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2019,9(1):44-52. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-991X.2019.01.007

    XU Z Q, LIU X Y, XIAO S H, et al. Evaluation and obstacle factors study of water environmental carrying capacity in the Pearl River Delta[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2019,9(1):44-52. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-991X.2019.01.007
    [38]
    王君萍, 刘亚倩, 李善燊. “双碳”目标下区域绿色金融发展时空特征及障碍因子诊断[J]. 生态经济,2022,38(10):53-61.

    WANG J P, LIU Y Q, LI S S. Spatio-temporal characteristics and diagnosis of obstacle factors of regional green finance development under the "double carbon" goal[J]. Ecological Economy,2022,38(10):53-61.
    [39]
    雷勋平, QIU R. 基于熵权TOPSIS模型的中国粮食安全评价及障碍因子诊断[J]. 中国农业大学学报,2022,27(12):1-14. doi: 10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2022.12.01

    LEI X P, QIU R. Evaluation of food security in China based on entropy TOPSIS model and the diagnosis of its obstacle factors[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University,2022,27(12):1-14. doi: 10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2022.12.01
    [40]
    XIANG K, ZHENG N, CHEN J, et al. Evaluation and obstacle degree analysis of low-carbon development level in Fujian Province: based on entropy weight topsis method[J]. Frontiers in Energy Research,2022,10:948893. doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2022.948893
    [41]
    毛峥. 后疫情时代, 产业园区何去何从: 2020年产业园区发展报告[J]. 中国科技产业,2021(2):47-49.
    [42]
    宁晓刚. 太原市高新区低碳评价指标体系研究[D]. 太原: 山西大学, 2015.
    [43]
    胡恩生. 江西省工业园区低碳化发展路径研究[D]. 南昌: 江西师范大学, 2015.
    [44]
    商婕, 曾悦. 绿色经济理念的生态工业园区综合评价指标体系[J]. 华侨大学学报(自然科学版),2015,36(6):698-703.

    SHANG J, ZENG Y. Reserch on comprehensive evaluation of eco-industrial parks based on green economy[J]. Journal of Huaqiao University (Natural Science),2015,36(6):698-703. ⊕
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(4)  / Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article Views(162) PDF Downloads(53) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return