Volume 11 Issue 3
May  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
WANG Xiaonan, LEI Kun, SUN Mingdong, LÜ Xubo, CHENG Quanguo. Research on optimal allocation and evaluation of allowable pollutant discharge in Zhangjiakou section of Yongding River[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2021, 11(3): 468-475. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20200197
Citation: WANG Xiaonan, LEI Kun, SUN Mingdong, LÜ Xubo, CHENG Quanguo. Research on optimal allocation and evaluation of allowable pollutant discharge in Zhangjiakou section of Yongding River[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2021, 11(3): 468-475. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20200197

Research on optimal allocation and evaluation of allowable pollutant discharge in Zhangjiakou section of Yongding River

doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20200197
More Information
  • Corresponding author: CHENG Quanguo E-mail: chengqg2011@163.com
  • Received Date: 2020-08-07
  • Publish Date: 2021-05-20
  • The environmental Gini coefficient was used to analyze the influence of land, population and gross domestic product (GDP) on chemical oxygen demand (CODCr) discharge of water pollutants in Zhangjiakou section of Yongding River Basin. At the same time, the distribution coefficient of each control unit was optimized by maximizing the utilization of environmental efficiency and minimizing Gini coefficient model, and a relatively fair distribution reduction scheme was made by environmental Gini coefficient method. The contribution coefficient of each control unit was calculated, the unfairness factor was judged, the spatial difference of the unfairness factor in the study area was analyzed, and the reasonable suggestions on regional development model were put forward. The results showed that the environmental Gini coefficient of each control unit based on land area, population and GDP was 0.504 4, 0.306 8 and 0.234 1, respectively, and the Gini coefficient based on land area was far beyond the warning value. Among CODCr discharge reduction schemes obtained after optimized allocation, Xuanhua District of Zhangjiakou City should have the highest reduction rate of 16%. According to the analysis of contribution coefficient, the contribution coefficient of Zhangjiakou downtown area was less than 0.5, and the unfairness was the most prominent. It was suggested that the regional industrial structure should be adjusted appropriately to improve the utilization rate of resources and reduce the discharge of pollutants.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    林巍, 傅国伟. 基于公理体系的排污总量公平分配模型[J]. 环境科学, 1996, 17(3):35-37.

    LIN W, FU G W. Study on allocating permissible pollutants discharge based on axioms system[J]. Environmental Science, 1996, 17(3):35-37.
    [2]
    林巍, 傅国伟. 公平规划及其在区域水环境综合整治规划中的应用[J]. 污染防治技术, 1994, 7(2):4-8.
    [3]
    屈福金, 王永安, 蔺科, 等. 本溪市大气污染物总量控制研究[J]. 辽宁城乡环境科技, 1997, 17(4):21-24.
    [4]
    幸娅, 张万顺, 王艳, 等. 层次分析法在太湖典型区域污染物总量分配中的应用[J]. 中国水利水电科学研究院学报, 2011, 9(2):155-160.

    XIN Y, ZHANG W S, WANG Y, et al. Analytic hierarchy process in total amount distribution of water pollutant in the specific area of the Taihu Lake Basin[J]. Journal of China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, 2011, 9(2):155-160.
    [5]
    高子亭, 庞天一, 赵文晋, 等. 基于公平与效率的地表水污染物总量分配优化模型[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2012, 40(14):8255-8257.

    GAO Z T, PANG T Y, ZHAO W J, et al. An optimal model of the total amount allocation for surface water pollutants based on the principles of equity and efficiency[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2012, 40(14):8255-8257.
    [6]
    BURN D H, MCBEAN E A. Optimization modeling of water quality in an uncertain environment[J]. Water Resources Research, 1985, 21(7):934-940.
    doi: 10.1029/WR021i007p00934
    [7]
    BURN D H, LENCE B J. Comparison of optimization formulations for waste-load allocations[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 1992, 118(4):597-612.
    doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1992)118:4(597)
    [8]
    DENG Y X, ZHENG B H, FU G, et al. Study on the total water pollutant load allocation in the Changjiang (Yangtze River) Estuary and adjacent seawater area[J]. Estuarine,Coastal and Shelf Science, 2010, 86(3):331-336.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2009.10.024
    [9]
    吴文俊, 蒋洪强, 段扬, 等. 基于环境基尼系数的控制单元水污染负荷分配优化研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2017, 27(5):8-16.

    WU W J, JIANG H Q, DUAN Y, et al. Application of total water pollutant load distribution in control-unit based on the environmental Gini coefficient[J]. China Population,Resources and Environment, 2017, 27(5):8-16.
    [10]
    DARKWAH K A, NORTEY E N N, LOTSI A. Estimation of the Gini coefficient for the lognormal distribution of income using the Lorenz curve[J]. Springer Plus, 2016, 5(1):1-9.
    doi: 10.1186/s40064-015-1659-2
    [11]
    BERREBI Z M, SILBER J.Deprivation, the Gini index of inequality and the flatness of an income distribution[J]. Mathematical Social Sciences, 1989, 18(3):229-237.
    doi: 10.1016/0165-4896(89)90032-2
    [12]
    SHESHINSKI E. Relation between a social welfare function and the gini index of income inequality[J]. Journal of Economic Theory, 1972, 4(1):98-100.
    doi: 10.1016/0022-0531(72)90167-6
    [13]
    AALAMI M T, NOURANI V, FAZAELI H. Developing a surface water resources allocation model under risk conditions with a multi-objective optimization approach[J]. Water Supply, 2020, 20(4):1167-1177.
    doi: 10.2166/ws.2020.025
    [14]
    UZAR U, EYUBOGLU K. The nexus between income inequality and CO2 emissions in Turkey [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 227:149-157.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.169
    [15]
    JIN J, WANG J X, MA X Y, et al. Equality of medical health resource allocation in China based on the Gini coefficient method[J]. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 2015, 44(4):445-457.
    [16]
    ZHANG X C, WANG F L. Life-cycle carbon emission assessment and permit allocation methods:a multi-region case study of China’s construction sector[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2017, 72:910-920.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.09.023
    [17]
    ZHENG X, XIA T, YANG X, et al. The land Gini coefficient and its application for land use structure analysis in China[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(10):e76165.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076165
    [18]
    杨芳. 基于基尼系数法的九龙江流域水污染物排放总量分配研究[J]. 环境科学与管理, 2012, 37(5):30-35.

    YANG F. Study on total pollutant load allocation of water bodies in Jiulong River Basin based on Gini coefficient method[J]. Environmental Science and Management, 2012, 37(5):30-35.
    [19]
    张慧, 席北斗, 高如泰, 等. 白洋淀水环境容量核算及上游容量分配[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2012, 2(4):313-318.

    ZHANG H, XI B D, GAO R T, et al. Water environmental capacity accounting and upstream capacity allocation of Baiyangdian Lake[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2012, 2(4):313-318.
    [20]
    ZHANG D D, SHEN J Q, LIU P F, et al. Use of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and environmental Gini coefficient for allocation of regional flood drainage rights[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020, 17(6):2063.
    doi: 10.3390/ijerph17062063
    [21]
    TANG Y L, LI Y N, DONG X, et al. Study on COD emission reductions assignment of basin based on information entropy method and Gini coefficient method[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2014, 1014:287-290.
    doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1014
    [22]
    ZHANG B, LIU H, YU Q Q, et al. Equity-based optimisation of regional water pollutant discharge amount allocation:a case study in the Tai Lake Basin[J]. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2012, 55(7):885-900.
    doi: 10.1080/09640568.2011.630068
    [23]
    田广宇, 刘湛, 刘浩, 等. 基于河流环境生态特征的永定河流域综合治理与管理[J]. 中国水利, 2019(22):42-44.

    TIAN G Y, LIU Z, LIU H, et al. Integrated management of the Yongding River based on environmental flow and ecological characteristics[J]. China Water Resources, 2019(22):42-44.
    [24]
    邵志江, 刘莲, 汪涛. 永定河上游张家口地区主要河流污染物来源解析[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2020, 42(2):204-211.

    SHAO Z J, LIU L, WANG T. Source analysis of main rivers’ pollutants of the upper reaches of Yongding River in Zhangjiakou area[J]. Environmental Pollution & Control, 2020, 42(2):204-211.
    [25]
    常月明. 半干旱区季节性河流流域的土地荒漠化成因及其治理研究:以塔布河流域为例[D]. 芜湖: 安徽师范大学, 2004.
    [26]
    黄勇. 永定河(北京段)生态治理成效及启示[J]. 中国水利, 2017(8):10-12.

    HUANG Y. Achievements and lessons learned from ecological restoration of Yongding River (Beijing section)[J]. China Water Resources, 2017(8):10-12.
    [27]
    郭如侠. 浅析张家口地区降水与地下水的相关性[J]. 地下水, 2014, 36(4):8-9.

    GUO R X. Astudy on the correlation between precipitation and groundwater in Zhangjiakou[J]. Ground Water, 2014, 36(4):8-9.
    [28]
    水利部. 中华人民共和国水文年鉴 2007—2017年第3卷海河流域水文资料第3册[M]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社,2008—2018年.
    [29]
    孟勤宪, 吴炳麟, 沈剑飞, 等. 环境基尼系数在遂宁市水污染物总量分配中的应用[J]. 四川环境, 2015, 34(1):74-77.

    MENG Q X, WU B L, SHEN J F, et al. Application of environmental Gini coefficient in total water pollutants allocation in Suining City[J]. Sichuan Environment, 2015, 34(1):74-77.
    [30]
    杨瑞. 基于环境基尼系数法的陕西省二氧化硫总量分配研究[D]. 西安: 西北大学, 2016.
    [31]
    秦迪岚, 韦安磊, 卢少勇, 等. 基于环境基尼系数的洞庭湖区水污染总量分配[J]. 环境科学研究, 2013, 26(1):8-15.

    QIN D L, WEI A L, LU S Y, et al. Total water pollutant load allocation in Dongting Lake area based on the environmental Gini coefficient method[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2013, 26(1):8-15.
    [32]
    孟祥明. 基尼系数法在水污染物总量分配中的应用[D]. 天津: 天津大学, 2007.
    [33]
    李昊, 南灵. 基于环境基尼系数的流域排污权初始分配[J]. 人民黄河, 2014, 36(5):56-59.

    LI H, NAN L. River basin emission rights initial allocation based on environmental Gini coefficient[J]. Yellow River, 2014, 36(5):56-59.
    [34]
    裴玲. 水污染物总量分配公平性评价与优化研究:以重庆市为例[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2014.
    [35]
    李扬, 卫海燕. 陕西省资源环境基尼系数与生态化实现度分析[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2010(11):51-54.

    LI Y, WEI H Y. Analysis of resource-environmentgini coefficient and ecological realization degree in Shaanxi Province[J]. Hunan Agricultural Sciences, 2010(11):51-54.
    [36]
    王金南, 逯元堂, 周劲松, 等. 基于GDP的中国资源环境基尼系数分析[J]. 中国环境科学, 2006, 26(1):111-115.

    WANG J N, LU Y T, ZHOU J S, et al. Analysis of China resource-environment Gini coefficient based on GDP[J]. China Environmental Science, 2006, 26(1):111-115.
    [37]
    张家口市统计局. 张家口经济年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2017.
    [38]
    翟腾腾, 郭杰, 欧名豪, 等. 基于基尼系数的江苏省建设用地总量分配研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2015, 25(4):84-91.

    ZHAI T T, GUO J, OU M H, et al. Study on allocation of total construction land in Jiangsu Province based on the Gini coefficient[J]. China Population,Resources and Environment, 2015, 25(4):84-91.
    [39]
    田平, 方晓波, 王飞儿, 等. 基于环境基尼系数最小化模型的水污染物总量分配优化:以张家港平原水网区为例[J]. 中国环境科学, 2014, 34(3):801-809.

    TIAN P, FANG X B, WANG F E, et al. Use of a minimum environmental Gini Coefficient Model on optimizing the allocation plan of total pollutant load in water bodies:a case study at Zhangjiagang River-Network Plain[J]. China Environmental Science, 2014, 34(3):801-809.
    [40]
    谢刚, 彭岩波, 李必成, 等. TMDL计划与小流域污染综合治理思路的研究:以南水北调东线山东段治污为例[J]. 农机化研究, 2006, 28(5):189-192.

    XIE G, PENG Y B, LI B C, et al. A comparative study on water pollution control between TMDL and small river basin pollution comprehensive treatment:example as water pollution treatment in Shandong Province during south water to north[J]. Journal of Agricultural Mechanization Research, 2006, 28(5):189-192.
    [41]
    叶春燕, 谷晋川. 基尼系数法在水污染物总量分配中的应用[J]. 西华大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 29(6):87-91.

    YE C Y, GU J C. Application of Gini coefficient method in total amount allocation for water pollutants[J]. Journal of Xihua University (Natural Science Edition), 2010, 29(6):87-91.
    [42]
    钟晓青, 张万明, 李萌萌. 基于生态容量的广东省资源环境基尼系数计算与分析:与张音波等商榷[J]. 生态学报, 2008, 28(9):4486-4493.

    ZHONG X Q, ZHANG W M, LI M M. Analysis of city resource-environment Gini coefficient based on ecological capability in Guangdong Province,China:discuss with Yin-bo Zhang[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28(9):4486-4493.
    [43]
    甘欣, 王思扬, 赵磊, 等. 四川省环境资源基尼系数分析[J]. 四川环境, 2015, 34(5):111-116.

    GAN X, WANG S Y, ZHAO L, et al. Analysis on resource- environment Gini coefficient of Sichuan Province[J]. Sichuan Environment, 2015, 34(5):111-116.
    [44]
    郝韶楠. 平原河网区水污染负荷溯源优化分配方法及应用[D]. 北京: 中国科学院大学, 2016.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article Views(424) PDF Downloads(75) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return