变化水文条件下河流生态流量估算以青海湖流域布哈河为例

Estimation of river ecological flows under changing hydrological conditions: a case study of the Buha River in Qinghai Lake Basin

  • 摘要: 在全球气候变化和人类活动影响加剧的背景下,以冰雪融水补给为主的河流水文过程呈现显著非平稳性特征,河流生态流量估算需要反映水文变异特征并适应水资源动态管理的需要。以青海湖流域布哈河为例,采用滑动T检验与Pettitt非参数突变检验开展流量突变诊断,划分不同径流阶段;基于水文学法和水力学法,结合生态流量满足度评价结果初步估算生态流量,并通过河床底质稳定性校核裸鲤洄游期生态流量。结果表明:布哈河1956—2020年径流过程存在显著分时段特征,2001年前后为突变节点,2001年后多年平均流量较前期提高15.98 m3/s。在裸鲤洄游期,相较基于1956—2000年流量序列估算的生态流量结果,基于2001—2020年流量序列估算的5—6月生态流量为14.65 m3/s(Tennant法),较前一流量序列时段增加6.04 m3/s,7月、8月生态流量分别为42.70 m3/s和42.30 m3/s(Q90法),分别增加12.04 m3/s和20.98 m3/s。非洄游期生态流量推荐区间为1.67~38.20 m3/s(Q90法),与基于1956—2000年流量序列估算的生态流量结果相比,1—4月、12月基本持平,9—11月增幅显著,分别增加23.84 m3/s、16.61 m3/s和4.64 m3/s。研究构建的生态流量动态估算方法,可为水文情势显著变异的河流生态流量核算与水资源优化配置提供支撑和参考。

     

    Abstract: Against the backdrop of intensified global climate change and human activities, hydrological processes of rivers predominantly replenished by snow and ice melt exhibit obvious nonstationary characteristics. Estimation of river ecological flow should reflect hydrological alteration and meet the needs of dynamic water resources management. Using the Buha River which is a tributary of Qinghai Lake as a case study, moving T-test and Pettitt non-parametric change-point test were used to diagnose abrupt changes in discharge and classify runoff stages. Ecological flows were preliminarily estimated using hydrological and hydraulic methods in combination with ecological flow satisfaction assessment, and the ecological flows for naked carp (Gymnocypris przewalskii) migration period were calibrated based on riverbed substrate stability. The results showed that the runoff regime of the Buha River during 1956-2020 exhibited significant stage-wise characteristics, with an abrupt change point around 2001. After 2001, the multi-year mean discharge increased by 15.98 m3/s compared with the preceding period. During naked carp migration period, compared with ecological flow estimates based on the 1956-2000 flow series, the ecological flow estimated from the 2001-2020 flow series for May and June was 14.65 m3/s (Tennant method), an increase of 6.04 m3/s over the previous period. The ecological flows for July and August were 42.70 m3/s and 42.30 m3/s, respectively (Q90 method), increasing by 12.04 m3/s and 20.98 m3/s, respectively. During the non-migration period, the recommended ecological flow range was 1.67-38.20 m3/s (Q90 method). Compared with ecological flow estimates based on the 1956-2000 flow series, the ecological flows for January-April and December remained largely unchanged, whereas those for September-November increased significantly, by 23.84 m3/s, 16.61 m3/s, and 4.64 m3/s, respectively. This dynamic estimation method provides a scientific basis for ecological flow accounting and optimal allocation in rivers subject to severe hydrological alterations.

     

/

返回文章
返回