利用渗滤液对生活垃圾焚烧飞灰进行水洗脱氯探索

Exploring the washing dechlorination of municipal solid waste incineration fly ash using leachate

  • 摘要: 生活垃圾焚烧飞灰水洗工艺是降低飞灰中氯含量的有效手段,但该过程会产生大量飞灰洗灰废水。若将渗滤液用于飞灰水洗,并利用现有的渗滤液处理设施处理洗灰后的混合废水,则可实现两种废物的协同处理,从而解决上述问题。通过对比不同固液比条件下各类垃圾渗滤液对飞灰的水洗效果,发现在固液比为1∶3和1∶4时,经各渗滤液方案处理后的飞灰,其可溶性氯浸出率均低于2%,且重金属浸出浓度满足HJ 1134—2020《生活垃圾焚烧飞灰污染控制技术规范(试行)》的要求。以浓度最高的Zn和Pb为例,二者浸出浓度均低于1 mg/L,与采用自来水水洗的飞灰中重金属浸出水平相当。进一步分析渗滤液在洗涤飞灰前后的水质变化发现,在固液比为1∶3和1∶4条件下,初次水洗后COD去除率最高可达86%,且第三次水洗后废液中各类重金属浓度均低于2 mg/L,符合HJ 1134—2020中相关污染控制限值要求。基于上述结果,确定最优水洗方案为:一级渗滤液水洗液进行碳化除钙处理,二级和三级渗滤液水洗液回用于后续水洗,剩余废水经膜过滤后回流至再生水系统。在小型处理设备中采用该最优方案进行实验,渗滤液洗灰水水质显著改善,钙离子浓度由4 400 mg/L降至未检出水平,全碱度由4 500 mg/L降低至50 mg/L,氯离子浓度由5 743 mg/L降至149 mg/L,COD由68 mg/L下降至34 mg/L,BOD5由97.1 mg/L降至7.6 mg/L,悬浮物由10.6 mg/L降至7.42 mg/L,所有指标均满足再生水水质要求。

     

    Abstract: The water washing process is an effective method to reduce chlorine content in municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) fly ash. However, it generates a large volume of washing wastewater. Utilizing landfill leachate for fly ash washing and subsequently treating the mixed washing-leachate effluent in existing leachate treatment facilities presents a synergistic solution to both waste streams. This study investigated the washing efficiency of various landfill leachates on fly ash under different solid-to-liquid (S/L) ratios. The results showed that at S/L ratios of 1∶3 and 1∶4, the soluble chloride leaching rate of fly ash was lower than 2% for all leachate types tested. Furthermore, the heavy metal leaching concentrations met the requirements specified in the Technical Specification for Pollution Control of Fly-Ash from Municipal Solid Waste Incineration (HJ 1134-2020). Taking the most-abundant metals, Zn and Pb, as examples, their leaching concentrations were both below 1 mg/L, which was comparable to the levels observed when using tap water for washing. Analysis of water quality changes in the leachate before and after washing revealed that, under the S/L ratios of 1∶3 and 1∶4, a maximum COD removal rate of 86% was reached after the first washing cycle Moreover, the concentrations of heavy metals in the wastewater after the third washing cycle were all below 2 mg/L, complying with the relevant pollution control limits set in HJ 1134. Based on these findings, an optimal washing scheme was proposed: The primary washing effluent underwent carbonation for calcium removal. The secondary and tertiary washing effluents were recycled for subsequent washing cycles. The remaining wastewater was treated by membrane filtration and then returned to the reclaimed water system. Experiments conducted with a small-scale treatment setup under this optimal scheme demonstrated significant improvement in the quality of the washing wastewater: Calcium ion concentration decreased from 4 400 mg/L to below the detection limit. Total alkalinity dropped from 4 500 mg/L to 50 mg/L. Chloride content was reduced from 5 743 mg/L to 149 mg/L. COD decreased from 68 mg/L to 34 mg/L. BOD5 fell from 97.1 mg/L to 7.6 mg/L. Suspended solids (SS) decreased from 10.6 mg/L to 7.42 mg/L. All treated water quality parameters met the requirements for reclaimed water.

     

/

返回文章
返回