矿产资源开发与生态保护的冲突原因及协调路径

Study on the causes of conflict and coordination pathways between mineral resource development and ecological protection

  • 摘要: 当前我国矿产资源开发利用强度持续提升与生态保护刚性约束不断强化,部分资源型地区仍面临开发与保护目标难以协同、生态修复成效滞后及治理体系碎片化等突出问题。在系统梳理政策文本、典型矿区实践及相关研究成果的基础上,首先从环境破坏、生态系统结构与功能退化、社会经济冲突3个方面,归纳矿产资源开发对生态保护的主要影响表现;进而从空间冲突、技术瓶颈与管理机制分割3个维度,揭示开发—保护矛盾的深层次原因。研究表明,矿业空间布局与生态功能区高度重叠、绿色开采与修复技术供给不足以及多部门、多主体协同治理机制不健全,是冲突长期存在并反复激化的关键原因。在此基础上,从制度协同、技术支撑与治理创新三个维度,提出法规政策衔接优化、绿色开采技术体系完善、生态补偿机制健全、多元主体协同共治及全生命周期监测评估等强化协调管理路径。研究构建了“影响表现—结构机理—治理路径”的分析框架,以期为资源型地区统筹矿产资源开发与生态保护,推动矿业高质量发展提供系统化的理论依据与决策参考。

     

    Abstract: With the continuous intensification of mineral resource exploitation and utilization in China, alongside increasingly stringent ecological protection constraints, some resource-based regions still face persistent challenges, including the difficulty of reconciling development and conservation objectives, lagging ecological restoration effectiveness, and fragmented governance systems. Based on a systematic review of policy documents, practices in representative mining areas, and relevant scholarly studies, this paper first summarizes the major ecological impacts of mineral resource exploitation from three perspectives: environmental degradation, deterioration of ecosystem structure and functions, and socio-economic conflicts. It further reveals the underlying drivers of the "development-protection" contradiction from the dimensions of spatial conflicts, technological bottlenecks, and fragmented management mechanisms. The results indicate that the substantial spatial overlap of mining layout with ecological functional areas, the insufficient supply of green mining and ecological restoration technologies, and the lack of effective multi-departmental and multi-stakeholder collaborative governance mechanisms are the primary factors contributing to the long-term persistence and recurrent intensification of such conflicts. Finally, the study proposes a series of coordinated management pathways from the perspectives of institutional coordination, technological support, and governance innovation, including improving the coherence of laws and policy frameworks, advancing green mining technology systems, strengthening ecological compensation mechanisms, promoting multi-stakeholder co-governance, and establishing full life-cycle monitoring and evaluation systems. This study constructs an integrated analytical framework of impact manifestations-structural mechanisms-governance pathways, providing systematic theoretical support and decision-making references for balancing mineral resource development and ecological protection in resource-based regions, thereby facilitating the high-quality development of the mining sector.

     

/

返回文章
返回