鄱阳湖总磷水环境容量动态变化特征及其影响因素

Dynamic characteristics and influencing factors of water environmental capacity for total phosphorus in Poyang Lake

  • 摘要: 基于2016—2024年鄱阳湖“五河七口”等入湖断面的水质、水量监测数据,对鄱阳湖的总磷(TP)入湖通量及规律特征进行分析,并运用沃伦威德尔、狄龙、合田健和OECD 4种经典湖泊水环境容量计算模型,对鄱阳湖的TP水环境容量进行计算,通过模型间差异对比分析,确定以狄龙、合田健和OECD模型计算均值为理论水环境容量,进而计算出“五河”各河流按径流量比例分配的TP水环境容量,结合实际入湖通量进行对比分析。结果表明:1)2016—2024年,鄱阳湖TP年入湖通量在7 619.85~19 183.91 t/a波动,与入湖水量呈显著正相关,水文条件是主要驱动因素。2)4种模型核算的鄱阳湖TP水环境容量存在明显差异,其中,沃伦威德尔模型计算结果偏低,并且相对偏差最大(−31.12%)。OECD、合田健、狄龙模型计算结果差异处于可接受范围(多数年份变异系数小于10%)且变化趋势相同,取其均值作为理论TP水环境容量,不同水文年变化范围介于6 340.03~12 065.24 t/a。3)2016—2024年,鄱阳湖TP年水环境容量平均超载33.59%,“五河”中赣江、饶河年均TP入湖通量均超出各自分配水环境容量限值,多年平均超载比例分别为33.69%、44.78%,信江、抚河仅分别在2022年、2020年出现盈余,其多年平均超载比例分别为34.19%、54.57%,修河多年平均盈余比例为1.23%。4)鄱阳湖TP水环境容量主要受水文情势变化、外部污染输入、湖泊内部过程、气候变化等因素影响。提升鄱阳湖水环境容量的关键在于进一步削减赣江等的TP负荷输入,同时建议结合流域水利调度、生态调控、内源控制、极端气候条件预警能力提升等综合措施。

     

    Abstract: Based on the water quality and volume monitoring data at key sections, including the "Five Rivers and Seven Inlets" entering Poyang Lake, from 2016 to 2024, this study analyzed the total phosphorus (TP) inflow flux and its variation patterns and characteristics. Four classic models for calculating lake water environmental capacity, including the Vollenweider, Dillon, Goda, and OECD models, were applied to estimate the water environmental capacity of TP for Poyang Lake. By comparing the outputs, the average value calculated by the Dillon, Goda, and OECD models was adopted as the theoretical water environmental capacity, based on which the TP water environmental capacities allocated to the Five Rivers by runoff proportion were calculated and then compared with the actual inflow flux. The results showed that: 1) From 2016 to 2024, the annual TP inflow flux to Poyang Lake fluctuated between 7 619.85 and 19 183.91 t/a, which was significantly positively correlated with inflow volume. This indicated that hydrological conditions were the primary driver. 2) Significant discrepancies were observed in the water environmental capacity of TP calculated by the four models. The Vollenweider model produced the lowest values and exhibited the largest relative deviation (−31.12%). In contrast, the results from the OECD, Goda, and Dillon models were within an acceptable range of difference (with coefficients of variation below 10% for most years), and their results followed similar trends. Their mean value was used as the theoretical water environmental capacity of TP for Poyang Lake, and the interannual variation ranged from 6 340.03 to 12 065.24 t/a. 3) From 2016 to 2024, the annual water environmental capacity of TP for Poyang Lake was overloaded by an average of 33.59%. Among the five major inflow rivers, the Gan River and the Rao River both exceeded their allocated water environmental capacity of TP, with multi-year average overloads of 33.69% and 44.78%, respectively. The Xin River and Fu River showed a surplus only in 2022 and 2020, respectively, resulting in long-term average overloads of 34.19% and 54.57%. In contrast, the Xiushui River maintained a long-term surplus of 1.23% on average. 4) Generally, the water environmental capacity of TP for Poyang Lake was primarily influenced by hydrological conditions, external pollution loads, internal lake processes, and climate change. Enhancing the water environmental capacity for Poyang Lake hinges on further reducing total phosphorus load from the Gan River and other sources. It was recommended to implement comprehensive measures integrating basin water resource management, ecological regulation, internal source control, and enhanced early warning capabilities for extreme climate events.

     

/

返回文章
返回