碳边境调节机制征收范围扩大对全球碳排放与经济的影响

Impact of carbon border adjustment mechanism scope expansion on global carbon emissions and the economy

  • 摘要: 欧盟等发达经济体主张通过跨境碳定价手段推动全球碳减排并保护本国产业竞争力,碳边境调节机制(CBAM)呈现出覆盖行业和征收地区扩张的趋势。为准确评估其碳减排效应与经济影响,科学防范政策冲击,以欧盟CBAM运作方式为依据,利用全球贸易分析—能源环境扩展(GTAP-E)模型设置了基准情景、行业扩展和地区扩展3种模拟情景,定量分析CBAM作用下不同地区和行业的碳排放与经济关键指标变化,综合评估政策的多重影响。结果表明:从全球来看,CBAM政策的碳减排效应较小,各情景下全球碳排放下降幅度在0.05%~0.25%,这主要是由于各地区和行业之间存在生产及贸易转移,能源及其他中间投入要素具有较为显著的替代效应;分地区来看,欧盟等征税地区碳排放量有所增加,正向经济效益显著,中国等被征税地区碳排放量减少,但遭受较大的经济损失;分行业来看,不同行业碳排放变化差异较大,在规模效应、替代效应和产业链上下游协同作用的影响下,被征税行业及其上游原材料供应行业碳排放减少,而其他未征税行业碳排放存在不同程度的增加。我国应通过加快完善碳定价机制、加强国际对话交流与合作、大力推动企业绿色低碳转型等措施,积极应对CBAM的多重影响。

     

    Abstract: Developed economies, including the European Union (EU), advocate using cross-border carbon pricing to promote global carbon emission reductions and safeguard the competitiveness of their industries. The carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM) is expanding its coverage to include more sectors and regions. To accurately assess CBAM's impact on carbon reduction and the economy and scientifically prevent policy shocks, this study established a baseline scenario, a sectoral expansion scenario, and a regional expansion scenario using the Global Trade Analysis Project-Energy and Environmental version (GTAP-E) model based on the operational rules of the EU CBAM. Quantitative analysis was conducted on the changes in carbon emissions and key economic indicators in different regions and industries under the action of CBAM, and the multiple impacts of policies were comprehensively evaluated. The results show that CBAM's effect on reducing carbon emissions is small, globally. Global carbon emissions decrease by only 0.05%-0.25% across the scenarios. This limited impact is mainly due to production and trade relocation between regions and sectors, coupled with significant substitution effects among energy sources and other intermediate inputs. Regionally, carbon emissions increase in regions implementing CBAM (like the EU), which also experience significant positive economic benefits. Conversely, carbon emissions decrease in regions subject to CBAM (like China), but they suffer substantial economic losses. Sectorally, changes in carbon emissions vary significantly. Under the combined effects of scale effects, substitution effects, and upstream-downstream linkages within supply chains, carbon emissions decrease in sectors directly covered by CBAM and their upstream raw material supply sectors. However, carbon emissions increase to varying degrees in other uncovered sectors. China should actively respond to CBAM's multiple impacts. Key measures include accelerating the improvement of its domestic carbon pricing mechanism, strengthening international dialogue and cooperation, and vigorously promoting the green and low-carbon transformation of its enterprises.

     

/

返回文章
返回