天津七里海湿地鸟类对旅游开发活动干扰的韧性研究

Avian resilience to tourism development disturbances in Qilihai Wetland, Tianjin

  • 摘要: 不同鸟类物种对外来干扰的响应具有差异性。以天津七里海湿地为研究对象,基于湿地公园开发前(2004—2007年)、开发运营期(2009—2015年)、修复保护期(2016—2023年)3个阶段的鸟类调查数据,采用聚类分析、单因素和多元线性回归分析等方法,研究鸟类物种性状与人类活动干扰韧性之间的关系。结果表明:1)七里海湿地3个阶段的鸟类物种数分别为190、159、175种,物种数量减少后有所恢复。2)鸟类对旅游开发活动干扰的响应聚类成5种类型,持续存在的30种,干扰时暂离又返的39种,干扰去除后复返的72种,去而不返的55种,湿地修复后新来的51种。3)量化前4种类型鸟类的干扰韧性等级并将其与鸟类生态性状开展回归分析,结果显示,居留类型与干扰韧性等级相关性不显著(P>0.05);窝卵数与干扰韧性等级呈显著正相关(P<0.05),在窝卵数较多(≥8)的28种鸟类中去而不返的仅2种;游禽、涉禽、杂食鸟以及浮巢鸟类与干扰韧性等级呈显著正相关(P<0.05),52.83%的游禽、33.84%的涉禽和50.0%的浮巢鸟类持续存在或暂离又返,杂食鸟对干扰较不敏感;地面巢和编织巢鸟类与干扰韧性等级呈显著负相关(P<0.05),分别有61.4%和45.8%的物种去而不返或干扰去除后复返。4)生境的适宜性和食物资源的丰富程度是鸟类干扰韧性的重要影响因素,受保护和濒危等级也是鸟类干扰响应差异的重要参考。研究表明,鸟类物种水平上的生物学和生态学性状能够揭示其应对干扰的韧性差异。

     

    Abstract: Avian species exhibit differential responses to anthropogenic disturbances. Based on the bird survey data from Qilihai Wetland in Tianjin across three distinct phases, that is wetland park pre-development (2004-2007), development/operation phase (2009-2015), and restoration/conservation phase (2016-2023), this study investigated the relationship between avian biological traits and disturbance resilience to human activities through cluster analysis, univariate and multiple linear regression analysis. The findings revealed that: 1) The number of avian species in Qilihai Wetland across the three phases was 190, 159, and 175, respectively, showing an initial decline followed by partial recovery. 2)Avian responses to tourism development disturbances were clustered into five patterns: 30 species persisted, 39 species left temporarily and returned during disturbances, 72 species returned after disturbances, 55 species left permanently, and 51 species came after restoration. 3)The disturbance resilience grade of the first four types was quantified, and their relationship with avian biological traits was analyzed by regression analysis. The results indicated no significant correlation (P>0.05) between residency type and disturbance resilience grade. However, clutch size showed a significant positive correlation (P<0.05) with disturbance resilience grade. Among 28 bird species with larger clutch sizes (≥8), only 2 left permanently. Waterfowl, wading birds, omnivorous birds, and floating-nest birds showed significant positive correlation (P<0.05) with disturbance resilience grade. 52.83% of waterfowl, 33.84% of wading birds, as well as 50% of floating-nest birds, either persisted or left temporarily and returned, while omnivorous birds were less sensitive to disturbances. Ground-nesting and woven-nest birds showed significant negative correlation (P<0.05) with disturbance resilience grade, with 61.4% of ground-nesting birds and 45.8% of woven-nest birds either left permanently or returned after disturbances. 4) Habitat suitability and food resource availability emerged as critical determinants of avian disturbance resilience, and the protection degree and endangerment status were also important references for understanding the discrepancies in disturbance response. The study demonstrates that the biological and ecological traits at the avian species level can reveal differences in their resilience to disturbances.

     

/

返回文章
返回