Volume 13 Issue 1
Jan.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
WANG Z W,WEI Y,LI S,et al.Spatio-temporal evolution and conflict measurement of ecological-production-living spaces in Jiaodong Peninsula[J].Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2023,13(1):386-393 doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210633
Citation: WANG Z W,WEI Y,LI S,et al.Spatio-temporal evolution and conflict measurement of ecological-production-living spaces in Jiaodong Peninsula[J].Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2023,13(1):386-393 doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210633

Spatio-temporal evolution and conflict measurement of ecological-production-living spaces in Jiaodong Peninsula

doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210633
  • Received Date: 2021-11-02
  • Optimizing the spatial development pattern of land is the primary measure to promote the construction of ecological civilization. Based on the analysis of the spatial and temporal evolution law of the ecological-production-living spaces in Jiaodong Peninsula, an ecological-production-living spaces conflict measurement model was constructed based on "risk source-risk receptor-risk effect" to identify the region and intensity of the ecological-production-living spaces conflict. The results showed that: From 2000 to 2015, the area change of ecological-production-living spaces in Jiaodong Peninsula had the characteristics of "one decline, one rise and one stability". The proportion of production space in Jiaodong Peninsula was the highest, followed by living space, the sum of which was about 85%. From 2000 to 2015, the average conflict index of Jiaodong Peninsula showed an increasing trend. The stable and controllable areas were mainly distributed in the nature reserves within the ecological space, and the seriously out-of-control areas were mainly distributed in the ecotone between the ecological space and production space, and that between ecological space and living space. The order of space conflict degree was production space > living space > ecological space. There were also great differences in spatial types and counties that changed with time.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    黄金川, 林浩曦, 漆潇潇.面向国土空间优化的三生空间研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展,2017,36(3):378-391. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2017.03.014

    HUANG J C, LIN H X, QI X X. A literature review on optimization of spatial development pattern based on ecological-production-living space[J]. Progress in Geography,2017,36(3):378-391. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2017.03.014
    [2]
    江曼琦, 刘勇.“三生”空间内涵与空间范围的辨析[J]. 城市发展研究,2020,27(4):43-48. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3862.2020.04.007

    JIANG M Q, LIU Y. Discussion on the concept definition and spatial boundary classification of “production-living-ecological” space[J]. Urban Development Studies,2020,27(4):43-48. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3862.2020.04.007
    [3]
    谭术魁.中国土地冲突的概念、特征与触发因素研究[J]. 中国土地科学,2008,22(4):4-11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8158.2008.04.001

    TAN S K. Research on concept, characters and trigger factors of land conflicts in China[J]. China Land Science,2008,22(4):4-11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8158.2008.04.001
    [4]
    黄安, 许月卿, 卢龙辉, 等.“生产-生活-生态”空间识别与优化研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展,2020,39(3):503-518. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2020.03.014

    HUANG A, XU Y Q, LU L H, et al. Research progress of the identification and optimization of production-living-ecological spaces[J]. Progress in Geography,2020,39(3):503-518. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2020.03.014
    [5]
    林坚, 刘松雪, 刘诗毅.区域—要素统筹: 构建国土空间开发保护制度的关键[J]. 中国土地科学,2018,32(6):1-7.

    LIN J, LIU S X, LIU S Y. Region-element coordination: the critical issue concerning the construction of the system for developing and protecting territorial space[J]. China Land Science,2018,32(6):1-7.
    [6]
    KARIMI A, HOCKINGS M. A social-ecological approach to land-use conflict to inform regional and conservation planning and management[J]. Landscape Ecology,2018,33(5):691-710. doi: 10.1007/s10980-018-0636-x
    [7]
    杨远琴, 任平, 洪步庭.基于生态安全的三峡库区重庆段土地利用冲突识别[J]. 长江流域资源与环境,2019,28(2):322-332.

    YANG Y Q, REN P, HONG B T. The study of land use conflict based on ecological security of the Chongqing section of Three Gores Reservoir area[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin,2019,28(2):322-332.
    [8]
    MA W Q, JIANG G H, CHEN Y H, et al. How feasible is regional integration for reconciling land use conflicts across the urban-rural interface: evidence from Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei metropolitan region in China[J]. Land Use Policy,2020,92:104433. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104433
    [9]
    徐建春, 周国锋, 徐之寒, 等.城市雾霾管控: 土地利用空间冲突与城市风道[J]. 中国土地科学,2015,29(10):49-56.

    XU J C, ZHOU G F, XU Z H, et al. Urban haze governance: land use spatial conflict and governance urban air duct[J]. China Land Sciences,2015,29(10):49-56.
    [10]
    方创琳, 贾克敬, 李广东, 等.市县土地生态-生产-生活承载力测度指标体系及核算模型解析[J]. 生态学报,2017,37(15):5198-5209.

    FANG C L, JIA K J, LI G D, et al. Theoretical analysis of the index system and calculation model of carrying capacity of land ecological-production-living spaces from county scale[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2017,37(15):5198-5209.
    [11]
    张合兵, 李铭辉, 张青磊.基于多源数据的国土空间规划用地分类体系构建和土地类型识别[J]. 农业工程学报,2020,36(5):261-269. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2020.05.031

    ZHANG H B, LI M H, ZHANG Q L. Construction of land classification system and land type identification for territorial spatial planning based on multi-source data[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2020,36(5):261-269. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2020.05.031
    [12]
    于伯华, 吕昌河.土地利用冲突分析: 概念与方法[J]. 地理科学进展,2006,25(3):106-115. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-6301.2006.03.013

    YU B H, LÜ C H. The progress and prospect of land use conflicts[J]. Progress in Geography,2006,25(3):106-115. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-6301.2006.03.013
    [13]
    杨永芳, 安乾, 朱连奇.基于PSR模型的农区土地利用冲突强度的诊断[J]. 地理科学进展,2012,31(11):1552-1560. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2012.11.017

    YANG Y F, AN Q, ZHU L Q. Diagnosis based on the PSR model of rural land-use conflicts intensity[J]. Progress in Geography,2012,31(11):1552-1560. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2012.11.017
    [14]
    周德, 徐建春, 王莉.环杭州湾城市群土地利用的空间冲突与复杂性[J]. 地理研究,2015,34(9):1630-1642.

    ZHOU D, XU J C, WANG L. Land use spatial conflicts and complexity: a case study of the urban agglomeration around Hangzhou Bay, China[J]. Geographical Research,2015,34(9):1630-1642.
    [15]
    王秋兵, 郑刘平, 边振兴, 等.沈北新区潜在土地利用冲突识别及其应用[J]. 农业工程学报,2012,28(15):185-192.

    WANG Q B, ZHENG L P, BIAN Z X, et al. Potential land use conflict identification and its application in Shenbei New District[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2012,28(15):185-192.
    [16]
    刘巧芹, 赵华甫, 吴克宁, 等.基于用地竞争力的潜在土地利用冲突识别研究: 以北京大兴区为例[J]. 资源科学,2014,36(8):1579-1589.

    LIU Q Q, ZHAO H F, WU K N, et al. Identifying potential land use conflict based on competitiveness of different land use types in Beijing, China[J]. Resources Science,2014,36(8):1579-1589.
    [17]
    康洁铭, 刘雨, 朱晓伟, 等.胶东半岛生态安全格局识别与优化布局[J]. 生态与农村环境学报,2020,36(8):1015-1025.

    KANG J M, LIU Y, ZHU X W, et al. Identification and optimization of ecological security pattern in Jiaodong Peninsula[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment,2020,36(8):1015-1025.
    [18]
    LIU J Y, KUANG W H, ZHANG Z X, et al. Spatiotemporal characteristics, patterns, and causes of land-use changes in China since the late 1980s[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences,2014,24(2):195-210. doi: 10.1007/s11442-014-1082-6
    [19]
    刘继来, 刘彦随, 李裕瑞.中国“三生空间”分类评价与时空格局分析[J]. 地理学报,2017,72(7):1290-1304. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201707013

    LIU J L, LIU Y S, LI Y R. Classification evaluation and spatial-temporal analysis of “production-living-ecological” spaces in China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica,2017,72(7):1290-1304. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201707013
    [20]
    张红旗, 许尔琪, 朱会义.中国“三生用地”分类及其空间格局[J]. 资源科学,2015,37(7):1332-1338.

    ZHANG H Q, XU E Q, ZHU H Y. An ecological-living-industrial land classification system and its spatial distribution in China[J]. Resources Science,2015,37(7):1332-1338.
    [21]
    廖李红, 戴文远, 陈娟, 等.平潭岛快速城市化进程中三生空间冲突分析[J]. 资源科学,2017,39(10):1823-1833.

    LIAO L H, DAI W Y, CHEN J, et al. Spatial conflict between ecological-production-living spaces on Pingtan Island during rapid urbanization[J]. Resources Science,2017,39(10):1823-1833.
    [22]
    蒙吉军, 江颂, 拉巴卓玛, 等.基于景观格局的黑河中游土地利用冲突时空分析[J]. 地理科学,2020,40(9):1553-1562.

    MENG J J, JIANG S, LABAZHUOMA, et al. The spatial and temporal analysis of land use conflict in the middle reaches of the Heihe River based on landscape pattern[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica,2020,40(9):1553-1562.
    [23]
    王超, 常勇, 侯西勇, 等.基于土地利用格局变化的胶东半岛生境质量时空演变特征研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报,2021,23(10):1809-1822. doi: 10.12082/dqxxkx.2021.190545

    WANG C, CHANG Y, HOU X Y, et al. Temporal and spatial evolution characteristics of habitat quality in Jiaodong Peninsula based on changes of land use pattern[J]. Journal of Geo-Information Science,2021,23(10):1809-1822. doi: 10.12082/dqxxkx.2021.190545
    [24]
    马伟波, 赵立君, 邹凤丽, 等.基于微地貌约束的山区型特色小镇“三生”空间布局优化[J]. 环境科学研究,2020,33(12):2724-2733.

    MA W B, ZHAO L J, ZOU F L, et al. Optimization of spatial layout of ecological-production-living spaces in mountainous characteristic towns based on micro-topography constraints[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences,2020,33(12):2724-2733.
    [25]
    黄诗曼, 胡庆武, 李海东, 等.基于RS和GIS的峨眉山风景区生态风险评价[J]. 环境科学研究,2020,33(12):2745-2751.

    HUANG S M, HU Q W, LI H D, et al. Ecological risk assessment of mount Emei based on RS and GIS[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences,2020,33(12):2745-2751.
    [26]
    祁帆, 贾克敬, 王葳.长江经济带国土空间开发利用问题与对策研究[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2016,6(6):621-628. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-991X.2016.06.089

    QI F, JIA K J, WANG W. Study on problems and countermeasures of land space development and utilization in the Yangtze River Economic Belt[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2016,6(6):621-628. □ doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-991X.2016.06.089
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(5)  / Tables(4)

    Article Metrics

    Article Views(155) PDF Downloads(27) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return