Volume 12 Issue 6
Nov.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
GUO T,ZHANG Y X,JIA R T.Comparative study of multiple water quality assessment methods in groundwater quality assessment: taking Chaoyang District of Beijing as an example[J].Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2022,12(6):2020-2026 doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210500
Citation: GUO T,ZHANG Y X,JIA R T.Comparative study of multiple water quality assessment methods in groundwater quality assessment: taking Chaoyang District of Beijing as an example[J].Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2022,12(6):2020-2026 doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210500

Comparative study of multiple water quality assessment methods in groundwater quality assessment: taking Chaoyang District of Beijing as an example

doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210500
  • Received Date: 2021-09-11
    Available Online: 2022-11-25
  • At present groundwater quality assessment method is numerous, and the selection of the appropriate assessment method is of great significance to the management and utilization of groundwater. Based on the detection results of groundwater samples collected in Chaoyang District, Beijing during the dry season in 2020, the improved analytic hierarchy process (AHP), single factor index method and comprehensive pollution index method were used to assess the groundwater quality, and the accuracy and irrationality of the assessment results of different water quality methods were compared. The results showed that: 1) The results of different water quality assessment methods varied greatly, the improved AHP was the best, the single factor index method was the worst, and the comprehensive pollution index method had the highest consistency with other methods. 2) In water quality assessment, the comprehensive pollution index method could be preferred. The single factor index method was suitable for water with high water quality requirements or few pollutants exceeding the standard. The improved AHP was suitable for water with multiple pollutants exceeding the standard. 3) In order to further determine the accuracy of groundwater assessment by different methods, the reliability analysis of different water quality assessment methods was carried out. The improved AHP, single factor index method and comprehensive pollution index method accounted for 90.48%, 42.86% and 47.62%, respectively, of the water quality assessment results that were the same as those in the reliability analysis. Therefore, in the comprehensive assessment of groundwater quality, the improved AHP could be used.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    洪慧, 李娟, 汪洋, 等.基于统计学方法的地下水水质评价与成因分析: 以齐齐哈尔市为例[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2019,9(4):431-439. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.2019.04.160

    HONG H, LI J, WANG Y, et al. Groundwater quality evaluation and causes analysis based on statistical methods: taking Qiqihar City as an example[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2019,9(4):431-439. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.2019.04.160
    [2]
    钱声源, 张乾坤, 陈从建, 等.焦作地区地下水水化学特征分析及水质评价[J]. 长江科学院院报,2020,37(4):30-36. doi: 10.11988/ckyyb.20181319

    QIAN S Y, ZHANG Q K, CHEN C J, et al. Groundwater hydrochemical characteristics and water quality assessment in Jiaozuo[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute,2020,37(4):30-36. doi: 10.11988/ckyyb.20181319
    [3]
    ŞENER Ş, ŞENER E, DAVRAZ A. Evaluation of water quality using water quality index (WQI) method and GIS in Aksu River (SW-Turkey)[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2017,584/585:131-144. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.102
    [4]
    滕彦国, 左锐, 苏小四, 等.区域地下水环境风险评价技术方法[J]. 环境科学研究,2014,27(12):1532-1539. doi: 10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2014.12.21

    TENG Y G, ZUO R, SU X S, et al. Technique for assessing environmental risk of regional groundwater[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences,2014,27(12):1532-1539. doi: 10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2014.12.21
    [5]
    杨咪, 侯凯, 钱会, 等. 改进的模糊层次法在宁夏渝河水质评价中的应用[J].环境工程,2017(增刊2): 367-371.

    YANG M, HOU K, QIAN H, et al. Application of improved fuzzy AHP method in water quality assesment of Yu River, Ningxia[J]. Envrionment Engineer, 2017(Suppl 2): 367-371.
    [6]
    乔肖翠, 李雪, 刘琰.2种方法在典型岩溶区地下水质量评价中的对比: 以地苏地下河为例[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2021,11(2):291-297. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20200120

    QIAO X C, LI X, LIU Y. Comparison of two methods in groundwater quality assessment in typical karst areas: taking Disu underground river as an example[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2021,11(2):291-297. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20200120
    [7]
    时雯雯, 周金龙, 曾妍妍, 等.新疆乌昌石城市群地下水多重水质评价[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,2021,35(2):109-116. doi: 10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2021.047

    SHI W W, ZHOU J L, ZENG Y Y, et al. Multiple groundwater quality evaluation of Urumqi-Changji-Shihezi City Agglomeration in Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment,2021,35(2):109-116. doi: 10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2021.047
    [8]
    孙大明.基于层次分析法的大连市大沙河流域水质综合评价[J]. 水电能源科学,2017,35(8):53-55,115.

    SUN D M. Comprehensive evaluation of water quality in Dashahe Basin of Dalian City based on AHP[J]. Water Resources and Power,2017,35(8):53-55,115.
    [9]
    WU T, WANG S R, SU B L, et al. Understanding the water quality change of the Yilong Lake based on comprehensive assessment methods[J]. Ecological Indicators,2021,126:107714. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107714
    [10]
    郇环, 廉新颖, 杨昱, 等.基于级别差法的地下水水质评价方法筛选技术研究[J]. 环境科学研究,2020,33(2):402-410. doi: 10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2019.06.19

    HUAN H, LIAN X Y, YANG Y, et al. Screening method for groundwater quality assessment based on level difference method[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences,2020,33(2):402-410. doi: 10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2019.06.19
    [11]
    ZHANG Q Y, QIAN H, XU P P, et al. Groundwater quality assessment using a new integrated-weight water quality index (IWQI) and driver analysis in the Jiaokou Irrigation District, China[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety,2021,212:111992. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.111992
    [12]
    杜娟娟.基于不同赋权方法的模糊综合水质评价研究[J]. 人民黄河,2015,37(12):69-73. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1379.2015.12.018

    DU J J. Research of fuzzy comprehensive water quality assessment model based on different methods[J]. Yellow River,2015,37(12):69-73. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1379.2015.12.018
    [13]
    花瑞祥, 张永勇, 刘威, 等.不同评价方法对水库水质评价的适应性[J]. 南水北调与水利科技,2016,14(6):183-189. doi: 10.13476/j.cnki.nsbdqk.2016.06.031

    HUA R X, ZHANG Y Y, LIU W, et al. Adaptability analysis of multiple evaluation methods in reservoir water quality evaluation[J]. South-to-North Water Transfers and Water Science & Technology,2016,14(6):183-189. doi: 10.13476/j.cnki.nsbdqk.2016.06.031
    [14]
    国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 国家标准化管理委员会. 地下水质量标准: GB/T 14848—2017[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2017.
    [15]
    潘荦, 黄晓荣, 魏晓玥, 等.三种常用水质评价方法的对比分析研究[J]. 中国农村水利水电,2019(6):51-55. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2284.2019.06.010
    [16]
    任文颖, 杨柳, 曹庆一.基于不同评价方法的柳州市水质分析[J]. 水资源开发与管理,2021,19(4):39-44. doi: 10.16616/j.cnki.10-1326/TV.2021.04.08

    REN W Y, YANG L, CAO Q Y. Water quality analysis of Liuzhou City based on different evaluation methods[J]. Water Resources Development and Management,2021,19(4):39-44. doi: 10.16616/j.cnki.10-1326/TV.2021.04.08
    [17]
    王志伟, 安慧, 耿春香, 等.综合污染指数法在环境影响后评价中的应用[J]. 广州化工,2020,48(5):143-145. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9677.2020.05.051
    [18]
    AKKOYUNLU A, AKINER M E. Pollution evaluation in streams using water quality indices: a case study from Turkey's Sapanca Lake Basin[J]. Ecological Indicators,2012,18:501-511. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.12.018
    [19]
    孙乃泉, 孙丽, 杨咏梅.层次分析法在大庆市地质环境质量评价中的应用[J]. 地下水,2013,35(2):142-143. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1184.2013.02.054
    [20]
    马骁, 张永祥, 王昊.改进的尼梅罗污染指数法在地下水水质评价中的应用[J]. 环境工程,2017,35(3):158-162. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201703033

    MA X, ZHANG Y X, WANG H. Application of modified nemerow index method for groundwater quality assessment[J]. Environmental Engineering,2017,35(3):158-162. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201703033
    [21]
    周灿, 廖振良, 孔令婷, 等.基于熵权的模糊层次评价法在滴水湖水质评价中的应用[J]. 能源环境保护,2020,34(1):82-87.

    ZHOU C, LIAO Z L, KONG L T, et al. Application of entropy-weight-based fuzzy hierarchical evaluation in water quality evaluation of Dishui Lake[J]. Energy Environmental Protection,2020,34(1):82-87.
    [22]
    GAO Y Y, QIAN H, REN W H, et al. Hydrogeochemical characterization and quality assessment of groundwater based on integrated-weight water quality index in a concentrated urban area[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2020,260:121006. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121006
    [23]
    杨静. 改进的模糊综合评价法在水质评价中的应用[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2014.
    [24]
    赵和平.环境综合评价模糊数学方法中4个算子的比较[J]. 贵州环保科技,2001,7(3):28-32,35.
    [25]
    李苏, 闫志宏, 徐丹, 等.改进的内梅罗指数法在水库水质评价中的应用[J]. 科学技术与工程,2020,20(31):13079-13084. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2020.31.060

    LI S, YAN Z H, XU D, et al. Application of improved nemerow index method in reservoir water quality evaluation[J]. Science Technology and Engineering,2020,20(31):13079-13084. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2020.31.060
    [26]
    王文章, 黎小东, 李小丽, 等. 改进的综合标识指数法在水质评价中的应用[C]//2013年水资源生态保护与水污染控制研讨会论文集. 2017: 256-260.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(5)  / Tables(2)

    Article Metrics

    Article Views(337) PDF Downloads(60) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return