Application of Fuzzy Mathematics Method on Establishment of Clean Production Evaluation Index System in Baotou Mixed Rare Earths Concentrate Enterprises
-
摘要: 评价指标的合理分级是行业清洁生产评价指标体系构建的难题,采用模糊数学评价方法对包头混合型稀土精矿冶炼业清洁生产评价指标体系制定过程中的指标进行分级。结果表明,该方法可以改变单一指标之间的比较评估为整体性评估,使某一评价对象的生产工艺及装备指标、资源能源消耗指标、资源综合利用指标、污染物产生指标、产品特征指标和清洁生产管理指标等6类指标经过隶属度计算得出一个综合评价结果,经计算得出多个评价对象的综合排序,使分级结果更加科学、合理,更有可操作性,对于指导其他行业清洁生产评价指标体系的制订具有很大的现实意义。Abstract: The reasonable classification of evaluation indexes is a problem for the establishment of the index system of cleaner production. The fuzzy mathematics assessment method was used for indicator classification in the establishment of clean production evaluation index system of Baotou mixed rare earths concentrate industry. The results show that, instead of comparison among single indicators, the holistic assessment combines indicators of production process and equipment, resource and energy consumption, pollutants generation, product characteristics and cleaner production management, presents an integrated result by the fuzzy subordination, and obtains synthetic ordering of multiple evaluation objects. This kind of method makes the grading result more scientific, rational and objective, which is practical for the establishment of clean production evaluation index systems in other industries.
-
[2] 国家发改委、环保部、工信部.清洁生产评价指标体系制(修)订计划(第一批)[z].(国家发改委、环保部、工信部公告 2014年 第16号) [3] 国家发改委、环保部、工信部.清洁生产评价指标体系制(修)订计划(第二批)[z].(国家发改委、环保部、工信部公告2016年 第8号) [4] 沈鹏, 毛玉如, 李艳萍等.中国清洁生产标准进展研究[J].环境与可持续发展, 2008, (3):19-21 [5] 段宁, 但智钢, 王潘.清洁生产技术:未来环保技术的重点导向[J].环境保护, 2010, (16):21-23 [6] 国家发改委、环保部、工信部.清洁生产评价指标体系编制通则(试行稿)[z].(国家发改委、环保部、工信部 公告 2013年 第33号) [7] BUCKLEY J J, FEURING T, HAYASH Y.Fuzzy hierarchical analysis[C]//Society for Risk Analysi Annual Meeting.Knoxville, TN:[S.N.], 1984:1009-1013. [8] Ocampo-Duque W, Feri-Huguet N, Domingo J, et al.Assessing water quality in rivers with fuzzy inference systems: A case study[J].Enviroument International, 2006, 32(6):733-742 [9] Khadam I M, Kaluarachchi J J.Multi-ceiteria decision analysis with probabilistic risk assessment for the managment of contaminated ground water[J].Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2003, 23(6):683-721 [10] Icaga Y.Fuzzy evaluation of water quality classification[J].Ecological Indicators, 2007, 7(3):710-718 [11] Li J B, Huang G H, Zeng G M, et al.An integrated fuzzy-stochastic modeling approach for risk assessment of groundwater contamination[J].Journal of Environmental Management, 2007, 82(2):173-188 [12] Uricchio V F, Giordano R, lOPEZ n.A fuzzy knowledge-based decision support system for groundwate[J].Journal of Environmental Management, 2004, 73(3):189-197 [13] 国家发改委、环保部、工信部.《生物药品制造业(血液制品)清洁生产评价指标体系》[z].(国家发改委、环保部、工信部 公告2016年 第25号) [14] 孙丽, 高亚琪, 王蕾等.新疆土地退化评价指标体系分级[J].广西农业科学, 2010, 41(2):141-146 [15] 石济开, 邵超峰, 鞠美庭.石油化工企业环境风险分级评价指标体系研究[J].安全与环境学报, 2015, 15(2):324-330 [16] 王兵, 孙启宏, 扈学文等.铅冶炼污染防治最佳可行技术筛选研究[J].环境工程技术学报, 2011, 01(6):526-532 [17] 李远远, 云俊等.多属性综合评价指标体系理论综述[J].武汉理工大学学报信息与管理工程版, 2009, 31(2):305-309 [18] 张凡勇.多属性综合评价方法与实证[J].统计与决策, 2 015, 21:65-68 [19] 贾继兵, 韩中庚, 杜剑平等.基于改进Delphi—AHP法的多属性综合评价模型[J].信息工程大学学报, 2010, 11(4):483-487 [20] 李玲玲.层次分析—模糊数学综合评价方法在天水市黄土滑坡稳定性评价中的应用[J].矿山测量, 2015, (3):41-42
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 1417
- HTML全文浏览量: 70
- PDF下载量: 1286
- 被引次数: 0