愉悦度在恶臭污染感官评价中的应用

翟增秀; 李伟芳; 邹克华; 杨伟华

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-991X.2018.05.072

愉悦度在恶臭污染感官评价中的应用

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-991X.2018.05.072

翟增秀^1,2,3,,
李伟芳^1,2*,,
邹克华^1,2,
杨伟华^1,2,3

^1. 天津市环境保护科学研究院,天津 300191
^2. 国家环境保护恶臭污染控制重点实验室,天津 300191
^3. 天津迪兰奥特环保科技开发有限公司,天津 300191

详细信息

作者简介:
翟增秀(1983—),女,高级工程师,硕士,主要研究方向为恶臭污染感官评价与测试工作

中图分类号: X512
计量
- 文章访问数: 808
- HTML全文浏览量: 129
- PDF下载量: 562
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2018-04-03
- 刊出日期: 2018-09-20

The application of hedonic tone in odour pollution sensory evaluation

ZHAI Zengxiu^{1,2,3
,},
LI Weifang^{1,2*
,},
ZOU Kehua^1,2,
YANG Weihua^1,2,3

^1. Tianjin Academy of Environmental Sciences, Tianjin 300191, China
^2. State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Odour Pollution Control, Tianjin 300191, China
^3. Tianjin Sinodour Environmental Protection Science and Technology Development Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300191, China

摘要

摘要: 为完善我国恶臭污染感官评价指标,针对橡胶制品企业、面包房、垃圾填埋场3种典型气味源,采用9级愉悦度度量法测定不同气味源臭气浓度下的愉悦度,解析不同源臭气浓度、臭气指数和愉悦度间的关系,提出了臭气浓度和愉悦度综合评价理论模型,即气味源的干扰潜力=臭气指数×愉悦度。结果表明,橡胶制品企业和垃圾填埋场愉悦度为负值,面包房为正值。3种气味源臭气浓度与愉悦度的关系均符合二次多项式模型,相关系数均达到0.99以上。干扰潜力计算结果:橡胶制品企业为-200.91;垃圾填埋场为-144.80;面包房为79.66。通过对具有相似臭气浓度但来自不同气味源的样品进行干扰潜力的计算,能更直观地区分不同气味源的影响,从而准确识别重点排放源及关键排放单元。研究显示,愉悦度更能反映恶臭对人的心理影响及危害程度,将愉悦度应用到恶臭污染感官评价中十分必要。
- 愉悦度 /
- 感官评价 /
- 恶臭污染 /
- 干扰潜力
Abstract: In order to enrich the sensory evaluation indicators of odour pollution in China, a 9-point hedonic tone method was used to determine the hedonic tone of samples at different odour concentrations from three typical odour emission sources including rubber products, bakery and landfill. A comprehensive evaluation model of odour pollution and hedonic tone was put forward by analyzing the relationship between odour concentration (odour index) and hedonic tone, that is, the annoyance potential of source = odour index × hedonic tone. The results showed that the hedonic tone of rubber products and landfill sites was negative value, while that of food processing was positive value. The relationships between the odour concentration and hedonic tone from the three kinds of emission sources are in line with the quadratic polynomial model. In addition, the correlation coefficients all reached above 0.99. The annoyance potential calculation results showed that the annoyance potential of rubber products and the landfill was -200.91 and -144.80 respectively, and that of food processing was 79.66. Applying this method, the different odour sources could be distinguished more intuitively, especially for the sources that have similar odour concentrations and different odours. Then the key emission sources and key emission units could be accurately identified. The research indicated that hedonic tone reflects the psychological impact of odour on people and its harmful degree more accurately, and it is necessary to apply hedonic tone to odour pollution sensory evaluation.
- hedonic tone /
- sensory evaluation /
- odour pollution /
- annoyance potential

HTML全文

参考文献(16)

[1]	沈培明, 陈正夫, 张东平 . 恶臭的评价与分析[M]. 北京: 化工工业出版社, 2005.
[2]	INVERNIZZI M, CAPELLI L, SIRONI S . Quantification of odour annoyance-nuisance[J]. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 2016,54:23-28.
[3]	CAPELLI L, SIRONI S, DEL ROSSO R , et al. Olfactometric approach for the evaluation of citizens’ exposure to industrial emissions in the city of Terni,Italy[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2011,409(3):595-603. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.10.054 pmid: 21106227
[4]	WUC D, LIU J M, ZHAO P , et al. Conversion of the chemical concentration of odorous mixtures into odour concentration and odour intensity:a comparison of methods[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2016,127:283-292. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.12.051
[5]	SUCKER K, BOTH R, BISCHOFF M , et al. Odor frequency and odorannoyance:part 2.dose-response associations and their modifications by hedonic tone[J]. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 2008,81:683-694. doi: 10.1007/s00420-007-0262-4 pmid: 17906873
[6]	张银, 王秀艳, 高爽 . 天津某家具城挥发性有机物健康风险评估[J]. 环境科学, 2013,32(12):4565-4570. ZHANG Y, WANG X Y, GAO S . Health risk assessment of VOCs from a furniture mall in Tianjin[J]. Environmental Science, 2013,32(12):4565-4570.
[7]	BOTH R, SUCKER K, WINNEKE G , et al. Odour intensity and hedonic tone-important parameters to describe odour annoyance of residents[J]. Water Science Technology, 2004,50:83-92. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2003.10.005 pmid: 15484746
[8]	杨伟华 . 典型恶臭污染源排放特征和恶臭感官评估[D]. 天津:天津工业大学, 2016.
[9]	SCHAUBERGER G, PIRINGER M . Odour impact criteria to avoid annoyance[J]. Austrian Contribution to Vetennary Epodemiology, 2015,8:35-42.
[10]	王亘, 王宗爽, 王元刚 , 等. 国内外恶臭污染控制标准研究[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2012,35(12J):147-151. WANG G, WANG Z S, WANG Y G , et al. Studyon odor pollution control standard of domestic and foreign[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012,35(12J):147-151.
[11]	赵岩, 陆文静, 王洪涛 , 等. 城市固体废弃物处理处置设施恶臭污染评估指标体系研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2014,34(7):1804-1810. ZHAO Y, LU W J, WANG H T , et al. Evaluation index system of odor pollution for municipal solid waste treatment facilities[J]. China Environmental Science, 2014,34(7):1804-1810.
[12]	方晶晶, 章骅, 吕凡 , 等. 生活垃圾收运过程中恶臭暴露的健康风险评估[J]. 中国环境科学, 2015,35(3):906-916. FANG J J, ZHANG H, LÜ F , et al. Health risk assessment of exposure to odorous pollutants emitted from the transportation process of MSW[J]. China Environmental Science, 2015,35(3):906-916.
[13]	颜鲁春 . 异味强度预测模型及其在恶臭评价中应用研究[D]. 北京:北京科技大学, 2015.
[14]	潘月云, 李楠, 郑君瑜 , 等. 广东省人为源大气污染物排放清单及特征研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2015,35(9):2655-2669. PAN Y Y, LI N, ZHENG J Y , et al. Emission inventory and characteristics of anthropogenic air pollutant sources in Guangdong Province[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2015,35(9):2655-2669.
[15]	German Association for Science and Technology. Olfactometry determination of hedonic odour tone:VDI-3882-2[S]. German:Bundesanzeiger, 1994.
[16]	CHAIGNAUD M, CARIOU S, POETTE J , et al. A new method to evaluate odour annoyance potential[J]. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 2014,40:13-18.