永定河怀来段水体富营养化评价

赵建国; 李洪波; 刘存歧; 李霄宇; 陈新勇; 闫栋华; 罗宁

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-991X.2018.03.033

永定河怀来段水体富营养化评价

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-991X.2018.03.033

^1. 河北省环境科学研究院清洁生产中心,河北石家庄 050011
^2. 河北大学生命科学学院,河北保定 071002

详细信息

作者简介:
赵建国(1991—),男,硕士研究生,主要从事水环境修复研究, 807078293@qq.com

通讯作者:
李洪波 E-mail: 2311892132@qq.com

中图分类号: X522
计量
- 文章访问数: 635
- HTML全文浏览量: 75
- PDF下载量: 222
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2017-12-21
- 刊出日期: 2018-05-20

Evaluation of eutrophication of water body in Huailai section of Yongding River

^1. Cleaner Production Center of Hebei Academy of Environmental Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050011, China
^2. College of Life Science, Hebei University, Baoding 071002, China

More Information

Corresponding author: Hongbo LI E-mail: 2311892132@qq.com

摘要

摘要: 为了解海河水系水污染防治重点区域永定河怀来段污染特征,于2016年11月—2017年10月进行了为期一年的监测。选择6个采样点的6项监测指标,阐述河流氮、磷的时空变化特征,并采用氮磷比和对数型幂函数普适指数公式法分析水体氮、磷营养盐结构时空变化规律,评估水体富营养化程度,解析富营养化风险。结果表明:永定河怀来段水体污染较为严重,其中TN浓度超过《国家环境保护标准“十三五”发展规划》中地表水环境功能区划分Ⅲ类水体浓度限值的13.25倍,有机氨(ON)和N $O 3 -$ -N为TN的主要存在形式;TP浓度均值为0.64 mg/L;各指标具备农业面源污染特征。水体中氮、磷时空分布特征明显:在时间尺度上,水体中氮、磷浓度呈现季节性变化规律;在空间尺度上,水体中氮、磷分布特征相似。永定河怀来段氮磷比年均值为32.78,水体浮游植物总体处于磷限制状态。平水期表现出磷为限制性营养元素,枯水期、丰水期氮磷比适合藻类大量的生长繁殖。永定河怀来段水体时空变化大多处在富营养化阶段,水体富营养化评价综合指数(EI)枯水期最大,为228.11;丰水期最小,为213.06;平水期居中,为218.30。永定河怀来段河流动力学过程良好,河流流态具有连续性,河流干流流速为0.43~1.45 m/s,远大于水华爆发的临界流量,干流大面积蓝藻水华现象的风险较低。
- 永定河 /
- 氮 /
- 磷 /
- 富营养化 /
- 风险评估
Abstract: In order to understand the pollution characteristics of the Huailai section of the Yongding River, which is the key water pollution prevention and control area of the Haihe river system, the water quality monitoring was performed for a period of 1 years from November 2016 to October 2017. Six sampling points with 6 monitoring indicators were selected to expound the temporal and spatial variation characteristics of nitrogen and phosphorus in the river. The N/P ratio and the universal index formula using logarithmic power function were used to analyze the temporal and spatial variations of nutrient structure of nitrogen and phosphorus in water, assess the degree of eutrophication, and analyze the eutrophication risk. The results show that the water pollution in the Huailai section of the Yongding River is comparatively serious. TN is 13.25 times over the Class Ⅲ concentration limit of the surface water environment function area. The ON and N $O 3 -$ -N are the main forms of TN. The mean value of TP is 0.64 mg/L, and each index has the characteristics of agricultural non-point source pollution. The temporal and spatial distribution of nitrogen and phosphorus in the water body is obvious. On the time scale, the concentration of nitrogen and phosphorus in the water body shows seasonal variation, and on the spatial scale, the distribution of nitrogen and phosphorus in the water body is similar. The average N/P ratio of the river section is 32.78, and the phytoplankton is overall in the state of phosphorus limitation. During the average water period, phosphorus is the limiting nutrient element, and the N/P ratio in the dry and flood periods is suitable for the growth and reproduction of algae. The temporal and spatial variation of water body in the Huailai section of the Yongding River is mostly in the ‘eutrophication’ stage. The maximum EI value is 228.11 in dry season and the lowest is 213.06 in flood season, while that in average water period is 218.30. The fluvial process of the river section is good, and the flow pattern is continuous. The flow velocity of the main stream is 0.43~1.45 m/s, which is much larger than that for the algal bloom. Therefore, the risk of cyanobacteria blooms in the main stream is low.
- Yongding River /
- nitrogen /
- phosphorus /
- eutrophication /
- risk assessment

HTML全文

参考文献(18)

[1]	李文洁 . 北京市对张家口市开展生态补偿研究[D]. 保定:河北大学, 2010. LI W J . Study on ecological compensation of Beijing city in Zhangjiakou[D]. Baoding:Hebei University, 2010.
[2]	常月明 . 半干旱区季节性河流流域的土地荒漠化成因及其治理研究:以塔布河流域为例[D]. 芜湖:安徽师范大学, 2004. CHANG Y M . The seasonal river in the semi arid area:a study on the cause and treatment of Tabu River Basin as an example[D]. Wuhu:Anhwei Normal University, 2004.
[3]	杨大杰, 徐磊 . 官厅水库水质现状分析与趋势预测[J].北京水务, 2009(2):30-32. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4637.2009.02.012 YANG D J, XU L . Current status analysis and future trend prediction on the water quality of the Guanting reservoir[J].Beijing Water, 2009(2):30-32. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4637.2009.02.012
[4]	聂泽宇, 梁新强, 邢波 , 等. 基于氮磷比解析太湖苕溪水体营养现状及应对策略[J]. 生态学报, 2012,32(1):48-55. doi: 10.5846/stxb201011171637 NIE Z Y, LIANG X Q, XING B , et al. The current water trophic status in Tiaoxi River of Taihu Lake watershed and corresponding coping strategy based on N/P ratio analysis[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012,32(1):48-55. doi: 10.5846/stxb201011171637
[5]	HAN H, ALLAN J D, SCAVIA D . Influence of climateand human activities on the relationship between watershed nitrogen input and river export[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2009,43(6):1916-1922. doi: 10.1021/es801985x pmid: 19368192
[6]	CARPENTER S R, CHRISTENSEN D L, COLE J J , et al. Biological control of eutrophication in lakes[J]. Environ-mental Science & Technology, 1995,29(3):784-786. doi: 10.1021/es00003a028
[7]	MONTEAGUDO L, MORENO J L, PICAZO F . River eutrophication:irrigated vs. non-irrigated agriculture through different spatial scales[J]. Water Research, 2012,46(8):2759-2771. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.02.035 pmid: 22417740
[8]	张晟, 李崇明, 付永川 , 等. 三峡水库成库后支流库湾营养状态及营养盐输出[J]. 环境科学, 2008. 29(1):7-12. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0250-3301.2008.01.002 ZHANG S, LI C M, FU Y C , et al. Trophic states and nutrient output of tributaries bay in Three Gorges Reservoir after impoundment[J]. Environmental Science, 2008,29(1):7-12. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0250-3301.2008.01.002
[9]	李哲, 郭劲松, 方芳 , 等. 三峡水库小江回水区不同TN/TP水平下氮素形态分布和循环特点[J]. 湖泊科学, 2009,21(4):509-517. LI Z, GUO J S, FANG F , et al. Potential impact of TN/TP ratio on the cycling of nitrogen in Xiaojiang backwater area,Three Gorges Reservoir[J]. Journal of Lake Sciences, 2009,21(4):509-517.
[10]	BOMCHUL K, KWANGSOON C, CHULGOO K , et al. Effects of the summer monsoon on the distribution and loading of organic carbon in Adeep Reservoir,Lake Soyang,Korea[J]. Water Research, 2000,34(14):3495-3504. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00104-4
[11]	罗固源, 康康, 朱亮 . 水体中TN/TP与藻类产生周期及产生量的关系[J]. 重庆大学学报(自然科学版), 2007,30(1):142-146.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-582X.2007.01.035. LUO G Y, KANG K, ZHU L . Relationship between the period and quantity of algae production and TN/TP in water[J]. Journal of Chongqing University(Natural Science Edition), 2007,30(1):142-146.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-582X.2007.01.035.
[12]	JIANG X, JIN X C, YAO Y , et al. Effects of biological activity,light,temperature and oxygen on phosphorus release processes at the sediment and water interface of Taihu Lake,China[J]. Water Research, 2008,42(8/9):2251-2259. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.12.003 pmid: 18191171
[13]	李祚泳, 汪嘉杨, 郭淳 . 富营养化评价的对数型幂函数普适指数公式[J]. 环境科学学报, 2010,30(3):664-672. LI Z Y, WANG J Y, GUO C . A universal indexformula for eutrophic evaluation using a logarithmic power function[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2010,30(3):664-672.
[14]	赵学敏, 马千里, 姚爱玲 , 等. 龙江河水体中氮磷水质风险评价[J]. 中国环境科学, 2013,33(增刊1):233-238. ZHAO X M, MA Q L, YAO A L , et al. Water quality risk assessment based on nitrogen and phosphorus in Longjiang River[J]. China Environmental Science, 2013,33(Suppl 1):233-238.
[15]	李炜 . 环境水力学进展[M]. 武汉: 武汉水利电力大学出版社, 1991: 330-338.
[16]	钟成华 . 三峡库区水体富营养化研究[D]. 成都:四川大学, 2004.
[17]	王孟, 邬红娟, 马经安 . 长江流域大型水库富营养化特征及成因分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004,13(5):477-481. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-8227.2004.05.015 WANG M, WU H J, MA J A . Eutrophication characteristics and cause analysis of large reservoirs in the Yangtze River Basin[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2004,13(5):477-481. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-8227.2004.05.015
[18]	张志兵, 施心路, 刘桂杰 , 等. 杭州西湖浮游藻类变化规律与水质的关系[J]. 生态学报, 2009,29(6):2980-2988. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2009.06.026 ZHANG Z B, SHI X L, LIU G J , et al. The relationship between planktonic algae changes and the water quality of the West Lake,Hangzhou,China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009,29(6):2980-2988. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2009.06.026