城镇污水处理厂综合效益评价——以辽河流域为例

张捍民; 邹翔; 姜威

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-991X.2017.05.079

城镇污水处理厂综合效益评价——以辽河流域为例

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-991X.2017.05.079

大连理工大学环境学院,辽宁大连 116024

详细信息

作者简介:
张捍民(1973—),女,教授,博士,主要研究方向为水污染控制理论与技术,zhanghm@dlut.edu.cn

中图分类号: X820.6
计量
- 文章访问数: 524
- HTML全文浏览量: 95
- PDF下载量: 653
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2017-04-15
- 刊出日期: 2017-09-20

Evaluation of comprehensive benefits of urban sewage treatment plants: taking Liaohe River Basin as an example

School of Environment Science & Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China

摘要

摘要: 从污水处理厂的运行成本和环境效益2个方面出发,建立了含有单位处理量建设费、单位处理量运行费、COD削减比例、氨氮削减比例4个指标的评价体系,采用熵权法确定相应指标的权重,应用欧式贴近度对污水处理厂进行综合效益的客观评价。基于污水处理厂的处理水量和出水水质特征,将辽河流域的47座污水处理厂划分为4类进行评价。结果表明:在处理能力2万t/d以下、出水水质满足GB 18918—2002《污水处理厂污染物排放标准》一级A标准的污水处理厂中,A ²/O工艺优越性较为明显;在处理能力2万t/d以上、出水水质满足GB 18918—2002一级A标准的污水处理厂中,MBBR+紫外消毒工艺综合效益较高;在处理能力2万t/d以下、出水水质满足GB 18918—2002一级B标准的污水处理厂中,A ²/O工艺优越性显著;在处理能力2万t/d以上、出水水质满足GB 18918—2002一级B标准的污水处理厂中,林泡尔工艺和百乐克工艺优势非常明显。
- 辽河流域 /
- 氨氮污染治理技术 /
- 熵权法 /
- 城镇污水处理厂 /
- 效益评价
Abstract: Based on the two aspects of operation cost and environmental benefits of the sewage treatment plants (STPs), the evaluation index system with four evaluation indexes, i.e. unit construction cost, unit operation cost, COD reduction rate, ammonia nitrogen reduction rate, was constructed. Then the entropy weight method was used to determine the corresponding weight coefficient, and the Euclid approach degree applied to realize the objective evaluation of the comprehensive benefits of the STPs. Based on the treatment quantity and water quality, 47 STPs in Liaohe River Basin were divided into four groups. The results showed that the superiority of A ²/O technology was more obvious when the water quantity was under 20 000 t/d and the effluent water quality was up to Level 1A standard of GB 18918-2002, while in the process that the water quantity was above 20 000 t/d and the effluent water quality was up to Level 1A, MBBR+ UV disinfection technology showed better performance in the comprehensive benefit.When the water quality was under 20 000 t/d and the effluent quality was up to Level 1B standard, the superiority of A ²/O technology was obvious, and in the process that the water quantity was above 20 000 t/d and the effluent water quality was up to Level 1B standard,the advantages of Linpaoer technology and BIOLAK technology were obvious.
- Liaohe River Basin /
- ammonia nitrogen pollution control technology /
- entropy weight method /
- urban sewage treatment plant /
- benefit evaluation

HTML全文

参考文献(19)

[1]	赵瑞, 高欣, 丁森 , 等. 辽河流域大型底栖动物耐污值[J]. 生态学报, 2015,35(14):4797-4809. ZHAO R, GAO X, DING S , et al. Tolerance values of macroinvertebrate taxa in Liao River Basin[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015,35(14):4797-4809.
[2]	辽宁省环境保护厅. 2011年辽宁省环境状况公报[R]. 沈阳:辽宁省环境保护厅, 2012.
[3]	孟伟 . 辽河流域水污染治理和水环境管理技术体系构建:国家重大水专项在辽河流域的探索与实践[J]. 中国工程科学, 2013,15(3):4-10. MENG W . Construction of technology system for watershed water pollution treatment and management:exploration and practice of the major water program in Liaohe River Basin[J]. Engineering Science, 2013,15(3):4-10.
[4]	王允妹 . 辽河沈阳段污染治理及生态恢复进程回顾[J]. 科技创新导报, 2015,12(30):156-158. WANG Y M . Review on environment pollution control and ecological restoration of Liaohe River in Shenyang[J]. Science and Technology Innovation Herald, 2015,12(30):156-158.
[5]	晁雷, 王健, 尤涛 , 等. 辽河上游地区农副产品加工废水污染现状及对策[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2016(4):108-113. CHAO L, WANG J, YOU T , et al. Status of agricultural processing wastewater pollution of the upper reaches of the Liaohe and countermeasures[J]. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2016(4):108-113.
[6]	辽宁省环境保护厅. 2015年辽宁省环境状况公报[R]. 沈阳:辽宁省环境保护厅, 2016.
[7]	魏亮, 陈滢, 刘敏 , 等. 城镇污水处理厂的综合绩效评价[J]. 环境工程学报, 2016,10(1):490-494. WEI L, CHEN Y, LIU M , et al. Comprehensive performance evaluation of municipal wastewater treatment plants[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2016,10(1):490-494.
[8]	邢佳, 孙伟光, 张宝杰 , 等. 基于层次分析法的流域规划城镇污水处理厂建设方案评估模型研究[J]. 环境科技, 2015,28(4):57-61. XING J, SUN W G, ZHANG B J , et al. Research based on analytic hierarchy process of construction scheme evaluation model of river basin planning urban sewage treatment plant[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2015,28(4):57-61.
[9]	ORTIZ M, RALUY R G, SERRA L . Life cycle assessment of water treatment technologies: wastewater and water-reuse in a small town[J]. Desalination, 2007,204(1):121-131.
[10]	KABLAN M M . Decision support for energy conservation promotion: an analytic hierarchy process approach[J]. Energy Policy, 2004,32(10):1151-1158.
[11]	熊焱, 齐香汝, 金文杰 , 等. 基于层次分析法的A/O工艺夏冬季节能耗评价[J]. 环境工程, 2014,32(4):148-152. XIONG Y, QI X R, JIN W J , et al. Energy consumption evaluation of A/O process in winter and summer based on AHP[J]. Environmental Engineering, 2014,32(4):148-152.
[12]	NEFESLIOGLU H A, SEZER E A, GOKCEOGLU C , et al. A modified analytical hierarchy process (M-AHP) approach for decision support systems in natural hazard assessments[J]. Computers & Geosciences, 2013,59(1/2/3/4/5/6/7/8):1-8.
[13]	林璐 . 基于生命周期评价方法的九龙江流域污水处理厂综合评价研究[D]. 厦门:厦门大学, 2008.
[14]	RENOU S, THOMAS J S, AOUSTIN E , et al. Influence of impact assessment methods in wastewater treatment LCA[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2008,16(10):1098-1105.
[15]	FLORESALSINA X, GALLEGO A, FEIJOO G , et al. Multiple-objective evaluation of wastewater treatment plant control alternatives[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2010,91(5):1193-1201.
[16]	邱红霞 . 基于熵权的灰色关联模型在水电工程评价中的应用[J]. 水科学与工程技术, 2010,157(2):33-35. QIU H X . Application of grey relation model based on entropy weight in evaluation of hydro-electric project schemes[J]. Water Sciences and Engineering Technology, 2010,157(2):33-35.
[17]	郝瑞霞, 刘峰, 吕鉴 , 等. 基于熵权物元模型的污水处理厂运行效果综合评价与分析[J]. 北京工业大学学报, 2013,39(3):445-451. HAO R X, LIU F, LÜ J , et al. Comprehensive evaluation and analysis on the operation of wastewater treatment plant based on matter-element model combined with entropy weight[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Technology, 2013,39(3):445-451.
[18]	周朝民, 耿彦博 . 基于熵权法的商业银行经营绩效评估[J]. 上海管理科学, 2008,171(6):9-10. ZHOU C M, GENG Y B . Entropy based performance appraisal of the commercial banks[J]. Shanghai Management Science, 2008,171(6):9-10.
[19]	龙腾锐, 赵欣, 林于廉 , 等. M-AHP-熵权组合赋权法在垃圾渗滤液处理技术评价中的应用[J]. 环境工程学报, 2010,4(11):2455-2460. LONG T R, ZHAO X, LIN Y L , et al. Application of M-AHP-entropy power combination weighing method in evaluation of landfill leachate treatment technology[J]. Chinese Journal of Environment Engineering, 2010,4(11):2455-2460.