铝合金电缆与铜电缆的生命周期评价研究

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

铝合金电缆与铜电缆的生命周期评价研究

党朋, 苏桓, 刘斌, 郑秋, 曾伟, 王乐

文章导航 > 环境工程技术学报 > 2014 > 4(1): 73-79

党朋, 苏桓, 刘斌, 郑秋, 曾伟, 王乐. 铝合金电缆与铜电缆的生命周期评价研究[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2014, 4(1): 73-79. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-991X.2014.01.013

引用本文:

党朋, 苏桓, 刘斌, 郑秋, 曾伟, 王乐. 铝合金电缆与铜电缆的生命周期评价研究[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2014, 4(1): 73-79. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-991X.2014.01.013

DANG Peng, SU Huan, LIU Bin, ZHENG Qiu, ZENG Wei, WANG Le. Life Cycle Assessment of Aluminum Alloy Cable and Copper Cable[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2014, 4(1): 73-79. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-991X.2014.01.013

Citation:

DANG Peng, SU Huan, LIU Bin, ZHENG Qiu, ZENG Wei, WANG Le. Life Cycle Assessment of Aluminum Alloy Cable and Copper Cable[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2014, 4(1): 73-79. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-991X.2014.01.013

党朋, 苏桓, 刘斌, 郑秋, 曾伟, 王乐. 铝合金电缆与铜电缆的生命周期评价研究[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2014, 4(1): 73-79. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-991X.2014.01.013

引用本文:

党朋, 苏桓, 刘斌, 郑秋, 曾伟, 王乐. 铝合金电缆与铜电缆的生命周期评价研究[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2014, 4(1): 73-79. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-991X.2014.01.013

DANG Peng, SU Huan, LIU Bin, ZHENG Qiu, ZENG Wei, WANG Le. Life Cycle Assessment of Aluminum Alloy Cable and Copper Cable[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2014, 4(1): 73-79. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-991X.2014.01.013

Citation:

DANG Peng, SU Huan, LIU Bin, ZHENG Qiu, ZENG Wei, WANG Le. Life Cycle Assessment of Aluminum Alloy Cable and Copper Cable[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2014, 4(1): 73-79. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-991X.2014.01.013

铝合金电缆与铜电缆的生命周期评价研究

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-991X.2014.01.013

党朋^1,3, ,,
苏桓²,
刘斌^1,3,
郑秋^1,3,
曾伟¹,
王乐¹

1.
上海电缆研究所
2.
美国通用电缆(中国)
3.
特种电缆技术国家重点实验室

通讯作者:
党朋 E-mail: bdang902@126.com

中图分类号: X820
计量
- 文章访问数: 3342
- HTML全文浏览量: 177
- PDF下载量: 1304
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2013-08-13
- 修回日期: 2013-10-21
- 刊出日期: 2014-01-20

Life Cycle Assessment of Aluminum Alloy Cable and Copper Cable

DANG Peng^{1,3
, ,},
SU Huan²,
LIU Bin^1,3,
ZHENG Qiu^1,3,
ZENG Wei¹,
WANG Le¹

1.
Shanghai Electric Cable Research Institute
2.
General Cable Corporation (China)
3.
State Key Laboratory of Special Cable

More Information

Corresponding author: DANG Peng E-mail: bdang902@126.com

摘要: 以具有相同载流能力的铝合金电缆和铜电缆为研究对象，运用生命周期评价(life cycle assessment，LCA)方法，对铝合金电缆和铜电缆全生命周期过程中对环境的影响进行了评价。结果表明，在中国资源消耗潜值、能源消耗潜值、酸化潜值、全球变暖潜值、富营养化潜值和工业用水6个特征值上铝合金电缆优于铜电缆，且在中国资源消耗潜值方面优势显著。只有在土地资源潜值这一特征化指标上，铝合金电缆高于铜电缆。
- 铝合金电缆 /
- 铜电缆 /
- 生命周期评价 /
- 环境影响
Abstract: The method of life cycle assessment (LCA) was applied to investigate the environmental impacts of aluminum alloy cable and copper cable which have the same current carrying capacity during the whole life cycle. The results showed that the six environmental characteristic indicators of aluminum alloy cable, including the Chinese abiotic depletion potential (CADP), the energy depletion potential, the acidification potential, the global warming potential, the eutrophication potential and the industrial water use, are superior to those of copper cable, and especially has significant advantage in CADP. For the aluminum alloy cable, only the land resource potential is higher than that of copper cable.
- aluminum alloy cable /
- copper cable /
- life cycle assessment /
- environmental impact

参考文献(0)

资源附件(0)

WeChat

点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数: 3342
HTML全文浏览量: 177
PDF下载量: 1304
被引次数: 0

/

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

分享

用微信扫码二维码

分享至好友和朋友圈

返回