滇池捞鱼河湿地公园不同功能单元水质净化效果及稳定性

宋雪燕; 马兰; 赵海茜; 土琦; 陆轶峰; 卢少勇

doi:10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.2019.01.030

滇池捞鱼河湿地公园不同功能单元水质净化效果及稳定性

doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.2019.01.030

^1. 云南大学生态学与环境学院,云南昆明 650091
^2. 云南省科学技术发展研究院,云南昆明 650051
^3. 中国环境科学研究院,北京 100012

详细信息

作者简介:
宋雪燕(1994—),女,硕士研究生,研究方向为生态学与环境工程, 13031600272@163.com;

中图分类号: X524
计量
- 文章访问数: 832
- HTML全文浏览量: 78
- PDF下载量: 248
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2018-08-29
- 刊出日期: 2019-03-20

Purification effect and stability of water quality of different functional units in Laoyuhe Wetland Park of Dianchi Lake

^1. School of Ecology and Environment Sciences, Yunnan University, Kunming 650091, China
^2. Yunnan Academy of Science and Technology Development, Kunming 650051, China
^3. Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China

摘要

摘要: 以滇池捞鱼河湿地公园(Laoyuhe Wetland Park,WP_lyh)为研究对象,分别在其不同功能单元设置监测点,研究湿地试运行期间(2015年4月15日—5月14日)不同功能单元对水体化学需氧量(COD_Cr)、氨氮(N $H 4 +$ -N)和总磷(TP)的去除效果,并在湿地进水口与出水口设置监测点,对湿地2015年4月—2017年3月的长期运行效果进行监测和分析。结果表明:WP_lyh试运行期间出水口COD_Cr、N $H 4 +$ -N与TP浓度相较进水口明显下降,去除率分别为40.07%、48.48%和40.38%,但处理效果仍不稳定。各功能单元中,入湖口表流湿地对COD_Cr去除效果(10.36%)最佳,林间浅水湿地前部对N $H 4 +$ -N去除效果(17.59%)最佳,林间浅水湿地后部对TP去除效果(9.44%)最佳;林间浅水湿地对污染物的总去除率占WP_lyh的53.15%,是湿地的优势净化功能单元。WP_lyh长期运行对COD_Cr、N $H 4 +$ -N和TP的月均削减量和去除率均随时间呈下降趋势,尤以运行1 a后下降趋势最为明显。
- 湿地公园 /
- 功能单元 /
- 水质净化 /
- 长期运行 /
- 滇池
Abstract: Taking Laoyuhe Wetland Park (WP_lyh) in Dianchi Lake as the research object, sampling points were set up in different functional units of the wetland to analyze the removal effects of COD_Cr, N $H 4 +$ -N and TP by different functional units in the testing operating period from April 15 ^th, 2015 to May 14 ^th, 2015. Sampling points were also set up at the inlet and outlet of wetlands and the long term operation effects in the period from April, 2015 to March, 2017 were monitored and analyzed. It revealed that during the WP_lyh test run, the COD_Cr, N $H 4 +$ -N and TP concentrations in the outlet were significantly lower than those in the inlet, with the removal rates of 40.07%, 48.48% and 40.38%, respectively, while the treatment effect was still unstable. Among the functional units, the surface flow wetland at the entrance of the lake had the best removal effect on COD_Cr with removal rate of 10.36%, the front part of the inter-forest shallow-water wetland had the best removal effect on N $H 4 +$ -N with the removal rate of 17.59%, and the back part of the inter-forest shallow-water wetland had the best removal effect on TP with the removal rate of 9.44%. It means that the decontamination rate of the inter-forest shallow-water wetland accounted for 53.15% of WP_lyh total decontamination rate, which could be regarded as the best purification unit in the wetland parks. WP_lyh's monthly reductions and removal rates for COD_Cr, N $H 4 +$ -N, and TP during long term operation and the removal rates of the three characteristic pollutants showed a downward trend with time. Especially after one year of operation, the downward trend was most obvious.
- wetland park /
- functional units /
- water quality improvement /
- long term operation /
- Dianchi Lake

HTML全文

参考文献(35)

[1]	VERHOEVEN J T A, MEULEMAN A F M . Wetlands for wastewater treatment:opportunities and limitations[J]. Ecological Engineering, 1999,12(1/2):5-12. doi: 10.1016/S0925-8574(98)00050-0
[2]	黄勇, 王成瑞, 廖义符 , 等. 四川望佳人工湿地系统处理生活污水净化效果[J]. 环境工程学报, 2015,9(2):773-780. HUANG Y, WANG C R, LIAO Y F , et al. Treatment efficiency of domestic wastewater at Sichuan Wangjia constructed wetland system[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2015,9(2):773-780.
[3]	张虎成, 田卫, 俞穆清 , 等. 人工湿地生态系统污水净化研究进展[J]. 环境污染治理技术与设备, 2004,5(2):11-15. YANG H C, TIAN W, YU M Q , et al. Study progress in constructed wetland ecosystems for sewage purification[J]. Techniques and Equipment for Environmental Pollution Control, 2004,5(2):11-15.
[4]	修春海, 焦盈盈, 武道吉 . 表流人工湿地改善玉清湖水库水质的研究[J]. 中国给水排水, 2008,24(13):100-105. XIU C H, JIAO Y Y, WU D J . Surface-flow constructed wetland for improvement of water quality into Yuqing Lake resevoir[J]. China Water & Wastewater, 2008,24(13):100-105.
[5]	刘红, 代明利, 欧阳威 , 等. 潜流人工湿地改善官厅水库水质实验研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2003,23(5):462-466. LIU H, DAI M L, OUYANG W , et al. Experimental studies on subsurface flow constructed wetland for water quality improvement in Guanting[J]. China Environmental Science, 2003,23(5):462-466.
[6]	苏营营, 胡文凌, 叶朝霞 , 等. 平原河网型水源地水质改善的实践和思考:以嘉兴市石臼漾人工生态湿地工程为例[J]. 环境工程, 2013,31(增刊):216-219. SU Y Y, HU W L, YE Z X , et al. Practice and thinking of water quality improvement with drinking water source in plain river network: an example of Shijiuyang artificial ecosystem wetland project in Jiaxing City[J]. Environmental Engineering, 2013,31(Suppl):216-219.
[7]	陈庆华, 余新峰, 王为东 . 石臼漾水源生态湿地工程的水质改善效果[J]. 中国给水排水, 2013,29(1):43-48. CHEN Q H, YU X F, WANG W D . Water quality improvement of Shijiuyang water source ecological wetland[J]. China Water & Wastewater, 2013,29(1):43-48.
[8]	蒋跃平, 葛滢, 岳春雷 , 等. 人工湿地植物对观赏水中氮磷去除的贡献[J]. 生态学报, 2004,24(8):1718-1723. JIANG Y P, GE Y, YUE C L , et al. Nutrient removal role of plants in constructed wetland on sightseeing water[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2004,24(8):1718-1723.
[9]	程龙, 李怀, 阎百兴 , 等. 无植物水平折流式潜流人工湿地对氮和磷的净化效果[J]. 湿地科学, 2016,14(2):219-225. CHENG L, LI H, YAN B X , et al. The nitrogen and phosphorus removal efficiency of horizontal baffle subsurface flow constructed wetland without plants[J]. Wetland Science, 2016,14(2):219-225.
[10]	崔芳 . 利用水平潜流人工湿地净化城市湖泊污水:以西安市兴庆湖为例[J]. 湿地科学, 2015,13(2):207-210. CUI F . Treatment of urban lake by horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands:a case of Xingqinghu Lake in Xi’an City[J]. Wetland Science, 2015,13(2):207-210.
[11]	岳春雷, 常杰, 葛滢 , 等. 利用复合垂直流人工湿地处理生活污水[J]. 中国给水排水, 2003,19(7):84-85. YUE C L, CHANG J, GE Y , et al. Use of integrated vertical flow constructed wetland for domestic sewage treatment[J]. China Water & Wastewater, 2003,19(7):84-85.
[12]	孙亚兵, 冯景伟, 田园春 , 等. 自动增养型潜流人工湿地处理农村生活污水的研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2006,26(3):404-409. SUN Y B, FENG J W, TIAN Y C , et al. Treatment of rural domestic sewage with self-aeration subsurface constructed wetland[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2006,26(3):404-409.
[13]	SAEED T, AFRIN R, MUYEED A A , et al. Treatment of tannery wastewater in a pilot-scale hybrid constructed wetland system in Bangladesh[J]. Chemosphere, 2012,88(9):1065-1073. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.04.055 pmid: 22673399
[14]	刘红, 代明利, 刘学燕 , 等. 人工湿地系统用于地表水水质改善的效能及特征[J]. 环境科学, 2004,25(4):65-69. LIU H, DAI M L, LIU X Y , et al. Performance of treatment wetland systems for surface water quality improvement[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Science, 2004,25(4):65-69.
[15]	徐斌, 陈翔, 武周虎 , 等. 表流人工湿地COD去除影响因素研究[J]. 绿色科技, 2017(8):28-31. XU B, CHEN X, WU Z H , et al. Study on influencing factors of COD removal in surface flow constructed wetland[J].Journal of Green Science and Technology, 2017(8):28-31.
[16]	GAGNON V, CHAZARENC F, COMEAU Y , et al. Influence of macrophyte species on microbial density and activity in constructed wetlands[J]. Water Science and Technology, 2007,56(3):249-254. doi: 10.2166/wst.2007.510 pmid: 17802862
[17]	梁雪, 贺锋, 徐栋 , 等. 人工湿地植物的功能与选择[J].水生态学杂志, 2012(1):131-138. LIANG X, HE F, XU D , et al. Plant function and selection for constructed wetlands[J]. Journal of Hydroecology, 2012(1):131-138.
[18]	范远红, 崔理华, 林运通 , 等. 不同水生植物类型表面流人工湿地系统对污水厂尾水深度处理效果[J]. 环境工程学报, 2016,10(6):2875-2880. FAN Y H, CUI L H, LIN Y T , et al. Advanced treatment of tail water from sewage plant by different aquatic plant types of surface flow constructed wetlands[J]. Techniques and Equipment for Environmental Pollution Control, 2016,10(6):2875-2880.
[19]	吴鑫, 和树庄, 陆轶峰 , 等. 进水方式对生态碎石床去除生活污水中氮的影响[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2018,8(5):481-487. WU X, HE S Z, LU Y F , et al. Effects of inflow modes on sewage nitrogen removal by ecological gravel beds[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2018,8(5):481-487.
[20]	张俊鹏, 陆轶峰, 国晓春 , 等. 表面流湿地去除洱海缓冲带低污染水氮模拟研究[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2018,8(5):488-494. ZHANG J P, LU Y F, GUO X C , et al. Nitrogen removal of simulated low-polluted water of Lake Erhai buffer zone by surface-flow wetland[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2018,8(5):488-494.
[21]	KADLEC R H . An autobiotic wetland phosphorus model[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2007,8(2):145-172. doi: 10.1016/S0925-8574(97)00257-7
[22]	REDDY K R, KADLEC R H, FLAIG E , et al. Phosphorus retention in streams and wetlands:a critical review[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2009,29(1):83-146. doi: 10.1080/10643389991259182
[23]	VERHOEVEN J T A, MEULEMAN A F M . Wetland for wastewater treatment:opportunities and limitations[J]. Ecological Engineering, 1999,12:5-12. doi: 10.1016/S0925-8574(98)00050-0
[24]	YANG X, ZHANG X P, WANG J F , et al. Performance of the subsurface flow constructed wetlands for pretreatment of slightly polluted source water[J]. Ecotoxicology, 2014,23(4):699-706. doi: 10.1007/s10646-014-1197-7 pmid: 24497042
[25]	WANG H, WANG X, WANG S M , et al. Purification efficiency of corn-pound aquatic plants for the eutrophic water body[J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2014,14(2):430-433. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.675-677.430
[26]	王博, 曲乾, 鲁子敬 , 等. 改性水生植物对水体硝酸根、磷酸根的吸附效应[J]. 生态科学, 2017,36(4):108-112. WANG B, QU Q, LU Z J , et al. Removal of nitrate(N O 3 - ) and phosphate(P O 4 3 - ) by modified straws prepared from reeds [J]. Ecologic Science, 2017,36(4):108-112.
[27]	吴建强, 周训华, 王敏 , 等. 水利停留时间变化对2种人工湿地净化效果的影响[J]. 环境工程学报, 2012,6(10):3537-3542. WU J Q, ZHOU X H, WANG M , et al. Influence of hydraulic retention time variation on purification effects of two different constructed wetlands[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2012,6(10):3537-3542.
[28]	徐光来, 袁新田 . 人工湿地植物的作用于影响因素[J]. 河北农业科学, 2018,12(12):63-65. XU G L, YUAN X T . Functions and influencing factors of macrophytes in constructed wetland[J]. Journal of Hebei Agricultural Sciences, 2018,12(12):63-65.
[29]	杨宗慧, 李亚园, 马贵鹏 , 等. 人工湿地工艺在污水处理中的应用优势分析[J]. 西南农业学报, 2017,30(7):1652-1655. YANG Z H, LI Y Y, MA G P , et al. Analysis on advantages of constructed wetland in sewage treatment[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2017,30(7):1652-1655.
[30]	NGUYEN L M . Organic matter composition, microbial biomass and microbial activity in gravel-bed constructed wetlands treating farm dairy wastewaters[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2000,16(2):199-221. doi: 10.1016/S0925-8574(00)00044-6
[31]	RICHARDSON J L, VEPRASKAS M J. Wetland soils:genesis,hydrology,landscapes and classification[M]. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2000.
[32]	牛晓音, 樊梅英, 常杰 , 等. 人工湿地运行过程中有机物质的积累[J]. 生态学报, 2002,22(8):1240-1246. NIU X Y, FAN M Y, CHANG J , et al. Organic matter accumulation in a constructed wetland during operation[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2002,22(8):1240-1246.
[33]	VALIPOUR A, HAMNABARD N, WOO K S , et al. Performance of high-rate constructed phytoremediation process with attached growth for domestic wastewater treatment:effect of high TDS and Cu[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2014,145(12):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.06.009 pmid: 24981281
[34]	于涛, 吴振斌, 徐栋 , 等. 潜流型人工湿地堵塞机制及其模型化[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2006,29(6):74-76. YU T, WU Z B, XU D , et al. Clogging mechanism and modelling in constructed wetlands with subsurface flow[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2006,29(6):74-76.
[35]	白佳琦, 张颖 . 人工湿地防堵技术研究进展[J]. 工业水处理, 2011,31(6):5-9. BAI J Q, ZHANG Y . Research progress in the technologies of clogging prevention in constructed wetlands[J]. Industrial Water Treatment, 2011,31(6):5-9.