Volume 7 Issue 3
May  2017
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
YANG Yu, LIAN Xinying, MA Zhifei, XU Xiangjian, JIANG Yonghai, PENG Xing, XI Beidou. Risk ranking technology method on groundwater pollution of contaminated sites[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2017, 7(3): 323-331. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-991X.2017.03.046
Citation: YANG Yu, LIAN Xinying, MA Zhifei, XU Xiangjian, JIANG Yonghai, PENG Xing, XI Beidou. Risk ranking technology method on groundwater pollution of contaminated sites[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2017, 7(3): 323-331. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-991X.2017.03.046

Risk ranking technology method on groundwater pollution of contaminated sites

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-991X.2017.03.046
More Information
  • Corresponding author: Yonghai JIANG E-mail: jyhai203@126.com
  • Received Date: 2016-07-12
  • Publish Date: 2017-05-20
  • Referring to the risk ranking methodology of groundwater contamination both at home and abroad and based on the comprehensive analysis on the key points of the groundwater pollution risk in the contaminated sites, the analytic hierarchy process was applied to establish the risk ranking index system on groundwater pollution of contaminated sites from three aspects, i.e. the contaminated sites properties, the groundwater inherent vulnerability in the contaminated sites region and the characteristics of the groundwater protection target. The risk ranking index system consists of 17 indicators. Based on the survey on contaminated sites and the physical and chemical properties of 159 typical pollutants, the risk level for each indicator was ranked. The total risk index was calculated by multiplying the individual risk indicators, and the method of groundwater pollution of contaminated sites was established by applying the clustering analysis. The method can effectively avoid the subjectivity of index weight calculation, and ide.pngy the main factors that lead to the risk. The results showed that the risk of groundwater pollution of contaminated sites could be divided into 3 levels, i.e. the risk value less than 5 (Level 1), between 5 and 15 (Level 2) and greater than 15 (Level 3). By applying the risk assessment system in a hazardous waste landfill, it was shown that the landfill had a potential risk of Level 3, and the properties of the contaminated sites, especially the characteristic pollutant was the main factors that caused the groundwater environmental risk.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    陈梦熊 . 中国水文地质工程地质事业的发展与成就:从事地质工作60年的回顾与思考[M]. 北京: 地震出版社, 2003: 56-62.
    [2]
    赵勇胜 . 地下水污染场地风险管理与修复技术筛选[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2012,42(5):303-310.

    ZHAO Y S . Risk management and screening of remediation technologies for contaminated groundwater site[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2012,42(5):303-310.
    [3]
    任常兴, 吴宗之 . 危险品道路运输风险分级指数法研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2006,6(4):125-129.

    REN C X, WU Z Z . Study on the risk rank indices of hazardous materials transportation[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2006,6(4):125-129.
    [4]
    SINGH R K, DATTA M, NEMA A K . A new system for groundwater contamination hazard rating of landfills[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2009,91(2):344-357.
    [5]
    ELISA G, ALEX Z, ANDREA C , et al. A risk-based methodology for ranking environmental chemical stressors at the regional scale[J]. Environment International, 2014,65:41-53.
    [6]
    ANGELIKA H, GABRIELE W, BERNADTTE O , et al. Ranking matrices as operational tools for the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified crops on non-target organisms[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2014,36:367-381.
    [7]
    METCALF S J, WALLACE K J . Ranking biodiversity risk factors using expert groups:treating linguistic uncertainty and documenting epistemic uncertainty[J]. Biological Conservation, 2013,162:1-8.
    [8]
    COLOMBO J C, CAPPELLETTI N, WILLIAMSON M , et al. Risk ranking of multiple-POPs in detritivorous fish from the Río de la Plata[J]. Chemosphere, 2011,83(6):882-889.
    [9]
    Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment. National classification system for contaminated sites[R]. Winnipeg, Manitoba:The Soil Quality Guidelines Task Group of CCME, 2008: 6-13.
    [10]
    VICTOR R G, MARIA P M, MARIA J G S , et al. Predictive modeling of groundwater nitrate pollution using random forest and multisource variables related to intrinsic and specific vulnerability:a case study in an agricultural setting (Southern Spain)[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2014, 476/477:189-206.
    [11]
    MARIA J G, LUIS F A, PATRICIA A , et al. Hydrogeochemical characterisation and modelling of groundwaters in a potential geological repository for spent nuclear fuel in crystalline rocks(Laxemar,Sweden)[J]. Applied Geochemistry, 2014,45:50-71.
    [12]
    SLACK R J, GRONOW J R, HALL D H , et al. Household hazardous waste disposal to landfill:using LandSim to model leachate migration[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2007,146(2):501-509.
    [13]
    SINGH R K, DATTA M, NEMA A K . A Time-dependent system for evaluating groundwater contamination hazard rating of municipal solid waste dumps[J]. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 2010,15(6):549-567.
    [14]
    王月, 安达, 席北斗 , 等. 基于三角随机模拟的生活垃圾填埋场地下水环境健康风险评价模型[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2016,6(1):49-56.

    WANG Y, AN D, XI B D , et al. Assessment model of landfill sites groundwater environmental health risk based on stochastic simulation-triangular fuzzy numbers[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2016,6(1):49-56.
    [15]
    US EPA. Risk characterization report for the HWIR 99 multimedia,multi-pathway,and multireceptor risk assessment(3MRA)[R]. Washington DC:US EPA.Office of Solid Waste, 1999: 27-58.
    [16]
    DAVID W R, LUK P, TREVOR P , et al. Accounting for surface-groundwater interactions and their uncertainty in river and groundwater models:a case study in the Namoi River,Australia[J]. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2013,50:108-119.
    [17]
    任智刚, 周建新, 张兴凯 . 基于SPSS聚类分析的企业职业伤害风险分级标准研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2006,2(3):43-46.

    REN Z G, ZHOU J X, ZHANG X K . Study on ranking standard of enterprise occupational injury risk based on clustering analysis of SPSS[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2006,2(3):43-46.
    [18]
    牛伟, 蒋仲安, 丁厚成 , 等. 聚类分析法在行业事故风险分级中的应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2008,18(4):163-168.

    NIU W, JIANG Z A, DING H C , et al. Application of cluster analysis to risk classification in industrial accidents[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2008,18(4):163-168.
    [19]
    ELANGASINGHE M A, SINGHAL N, DIRKS K N . Complex time series analysis of PM10 and PM2.5 for a coastal site using a.pngicial neural network modeling and k-means clustering[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2014,94:106-116.
    [20]
    MALLEY C S, BRABAN C F, HEAL M R . The application of hierarchical cluster analysis and non-negative matrix factorization to European atmospheric monitoring site classification[J]. Atmospheric Research, 2014,138(1):30-40.
    [21]
    ALEX M, RICHELLE W, LAUREN F . Classification of watersheds into integrated social and biophysical indicators with clustering analysis[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2014,45:340-349.
    [22]
    地下水质量标准:GB/T 14848—93[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 1993.
    [23]
    NESHAT A, PRADHAN B, DADRAS M . Groundwater vulnerability assessment using an improved DRASTIC method in GIS[J]. Resources,Conservation and Recycling, 2014,86:74-86.
    [24]
    LEONE A, RIPA M N, URICCHIO V , et al. Vulnerability and risk evaluation of agricultural nitrogen pollution for Hungary's main aquifer using DRASTIC and GLEAMS models[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2009,90(10):2969-2978.
    [25]
    ATIQUR R . A GIS based DRASTIC model for assessing groundwater vulnerability in shallow aquifer in Aligarh,India[J]. Applied Geography, 2008,28(1):32-53.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article Views(986) PDF Downloads(1077) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return