Volume 12 Issue 6
Nov.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LI Y F,LI X M,ZHAO Y T,et al.Effectiveness analysis of planning environmental impact assessment based on multiple indicators: taking industrial parks as an example[J].Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2022,12(6):1796-1802 doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20220634
Citation: LI Y F,LI X M,ZHAO Y T,et al.Effectiveness analysis of planning environmental impact assessment based on multiple indicators: taking industrial parks as an example[J].Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2022,12(6):1796-1802 doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20220634

Effectiveness analysis of planning environmental impact assessment based on multiple indicators: taking industrial parks as an example

doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20220634
  • Received Date: 2022-06-20
    Available Online: 2022-09-22
  • To better improve the effectiveness of the planning environmental impact assessment (PEIA), twenty-six cases of industrial park PEIA were selected as examples to construct an indicator system to analyze the implementation achievements and inadequacies of industrial park PEIA. The indicator system included four dimensions and 14 indexes, with the four dimensions being promoting improvement of regional environmental quality, optimizing spatial layout, preventing and eliminating of environmental risks and promoting high-level development of the park. The results showed that PEIA of industrial parks had achieved remarkable substantive effectiveness results in implementation of total amount control and performance requirements, implementation of industrial admittance restrictions, protection and avoidance of environmental sensitive areas, and implementation of tracking and supervision plans. However, there still remained inadequacy in complete supporting sewage treatment facilities, coordination of residential environment and security risks, cleaner production and circular economy development. In terms of park levels, the implementation effects of PEIA of national industrial parks were better than that of industrial parks at provincial level and below, and as to time periods, the industrial parks passing examination during or after the 13th Five-year Plan period were better than before, with the strengthening of the guidance and reform promotion of industrial park planning EIA at the national level. In terms of regions, the eastern region had a strong economic foundation and early implementation of EIA, paid more attention to the role of PEIA as a preventive tool in promoting high-quality development, and thus was more capable than the other regions to implement and enforce the recommendations of PEIA. Based on problem orientation, some suggestions were proposed including enhancing industrial park environmental management, strengthening PEIA tracking and supervision, and promoting the joint participation of multi-departments in the preparation and implementation of PEIA. These proposals could provide references for the management departments to strengthen management of industrial park PEIA and promote the implementation of PEIA outcomes.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    REGA C, SINGER J P, GENELETTI D. Investigating the substantive effectiveness of Strategic Environmental Assessment of urban planning: evidence from Italy and Spain[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review,2018,73:60-69. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2018.07.004
    [2]
    REHHAUSEN A, KÖPPEL J, SCHOLLES F, et al. Quality of federal level strategic environmental assessment: a case study analysis for transport, transmission grid and maritime spatial planning in Germany[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review,2018,73:41-59. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2018.07.002
    [3]
    REHHAUSEN A. The art of underperforming SEA : symptomatic narratives from Germany[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review,2019,78:106280. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106280
    [4]
    THERIVEL R. Effectiveness of English local plan SA/SEAs[J]. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal,2019,37(3/4):266-278.
    [5]
    GONZÁLEZ A, BULLOCK C, GAUGHRAN A, et al. Towards a better understanding of SEA effectiveness in Ireland[J]. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal,2019,37(3/4):233-246.
    [6]
    郑欣璐, 包存宽.环评改革应着力于提高有效性: 《“十三五”环境影响评价改革实施方案》评析[J]. 中国生态文明,2016(5):33-35.
    [7]
    王会芝, 徐鹤, 吕建华, 等.中国战略环境评价实施现状及有效性研究: 基于统计分析的调查研究[J]. 环境污染与防治,2010,32(9):103-106.
    [8]
    徐鹤, 王会芝.新常态下我国规划环境影响评价有效性问题探析[J]. 环境保护,2015,43(10):24-26.
    [9]
    李洋阳, 汪自书, 吕春英, 等. 涉海洋自然保护区规划环评有效性分析及对策建议: 以大连斑海豹国家级自然保护区为例[C]. 北京: 中国环境科学学会科学技术年会论文集, 2019.
    [10]
    范顺利, 郭苏, 武朋飞.基于AHP-模糊综合评价法的规划环境影响评价有效性研究[J]. 环境科学与管理,2017,42(7):176-179.

    FAN S L, GUO S, WU P F. Study on effectiveness of planning environmental impact assessment based on AHP-fuzzy synthetic evaluation method[J]. Environmental Science and Management,2017,42(7):176-179.
    [11]
    谈兆敏.我国EIA有效性分析与指标优化研究[J]. 安徽农业科学,2010,38(32):18244-18246.

    TAN Z M. Research on EIA effectiveness analysis and indicators optimization in China[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences,2010,38(32):18244-18246.
    [12]
    张秀. 规划环境影响评价有效性研究: 以松原市为例[D]. 长春: 东北师范大学, 2014.
    [13]
    刘兰岚, 杨凯, 徐启新, 等.规划环境影响评价有效性研究[J]. 环境保护,2006,34(23):63-66.
    [14]
    周丹平, 孙荪, 包存宽, 等.规划环境影响评价项目实施有效性的评估[J]. 环境科学研究,2007,20(5):66-71.

    ZHOU D P, SUN S, BAO C K, et al. The evaluation for effectiveness of planning environmental impact assessment program[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences,2007,20(5):66-71.
    [15]
    孙荪. 我国实施规划环境影响评价的有效性研究[D]. 上海: 同济大学, 2008.
    [16]
    王会芝. 中国战略环境评价的有效性研究[D]. 天津: 南开大学, 2013.
    [17]
    王珏, 何佳, 包存宽.我国规划环评有效性的分析框架研究[J]. 环境影响评价,2020,42(3):35-38.

    WANG J, HE J, BAO C K. Research on the analytical framework of the effectiveness of China's PEIA[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment,2020,42(3):35-38.
    [18]
    黄蕊, 李巍, 韩宇.基于典型案例的流域规划环评管理成效评估[J]. 中国环境科学,2021,41(7):3409-3417.

    HUANG R, LI W, HAN Y. A performance evaluation based on typical cases of environmental impact assessment of watershed development plans[J]. China Environmental Science,2021,41(7):3409-3417.
    [19]
    仇昕昕, 许明珠, 张慧玲, 等. 国家级产业园区规划环评成效、存在问题及对策建议[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2022,12(6):1781-1787.

    QIU X X, XU M Z, ZHANG H L, et al. Achievements, problems and suggestions of planning environmental impact assessment of national industrial park[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2022,12(6):1781-1787.
    [20]
    “十三五”环境影响评价改革实施方案[A]. 北京: 生态环境部, 2022.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(5)  / Tables(4)

    Article Metrics

    Article Views(268) PDF Downloads(26) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return