Volume 13 Issue 3
May  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LÜ Z X,SHI G M,WU Y F,et al.Study on the cost-effectiveness of paid use policy of pollutant emission allowance in China[J].Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2023,13(3):1269-1274 doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20220566
Citation: LÜ Z X,SHI G M,WU Y F,et al.Study on the cost-effectiveness of paid use policy of pollutant emission allowance in China[J].Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2023,13(3):1269-1274 doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20220566

Study on the cost-effectiveness of paid use policy of pollutant emission allowance in China

doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20220566
  • Received Date: 2022-06-05
  • Accepted Date: 2022-10-09
  • Rev Recd Date: 2022-09-28
  • In order to analyze the cost-effectiveness of the paid use policy of pollutant emission allowance and the environmental tax policy on the emission trading market in China, the principles of promoting enterprise pollutant emission reduction by three environmental management instruments (i.e. emission trading, paid use of pollutant allowance, and environmental tax) were analyzed, based on the principles of emission trading. After that, ten virtual enterprises were set up to simulate and analyze the cost-effectiveness of different policy scenarios. The results showed that the coexistence of three policy instruments had no effect on the emission trading of enterprises when the emission trading policy was dominant. Meanwhile, the role of the paid use policy of pollutant emission allowance and the environmental tax policy in the emission trading market was the same; both could reduce the transaction price of the emission allowance and increase pollutant abatement cost. If the paid use price of pollutant emission allowance or the environmental tax rate (or the sum of both) exceeded the marginal abatement cost of the enterprises when the original emission trading market was balanced, the emission trading market would appear "failure" phenomenon, which meant that the enterprises would no longer seek to carry out the emission trading, but pay the compensated fee for the use of pollutant emission right or the environmental tax (or both).

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    王金南. 二氧化硫排放交易: 美国的经验与中国的前景[M]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2000.
    [2]
    HLASNY V. SO2 emission permits tradable under exchange rates: U.S. case[J]. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2011. doi: 10.2139/SSRN.2029452.
    [3]
    TIETENBERG T. Emissions trading: principles and practice[M]. 2nd ed. Washington DC: RFF Press,2006
    [4]
    WEISHAAR S E. Emissions trading design: a critical overview[M]. Cheltenham, UK Northampton:Edward Elgar Press, 2014.
    [5]
    冷罗生.日本温室气体排放权交易制度及启示[J]. 法学杂志,2011,32(1):65-68. doi: 10.16092/j.cnki.1001-618x.2011.01.005

    LENG L S. Research about Japan's trading system of GHS emission rights and its enlightenment[J]. Law Science Magazine,2011,32(1):65-68. doi: 10.16092/j.cnki.1001-618x.2011.01.005
    [6]
    王金南, 毕军. 排污交易: 实践与创新: 排污交易国际研讨会论文集[M]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2009.
    [7]
    郝春旭, 董战峰, 葛察忠, 等.国家环境经济政策进展评估报告2020[J]. 中国环境管理,2021,13(2):10-15.

    HAO C X, DONG Z F, GE C Z, et al. National environmental economic policy progress assessment report 2020[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Management,2021,13(2):10-15.
    [8]
    易爱军, 杨佃春, 张金保.排污权有偿使用和交易定价问题研究: 以连云港海域化学需氧量排放为例[J]. 价格理论与实践,2016(12):64-67.

    YI A J, YANG D C, ZHANG J B. Research on the pricing problem of paid use and transaction of emission rights: a case study of chemical oxygen demand in the sea area of Lianyungang[J]. Price:Theory & Practice,2016(12):64-67.
    [9]
    吴柳芳, 张滨, 冯晓飞, 等.浙江省排污权有偿使用价格的实例研究[J]. 环境科学与管理,2015,40(5):174-177.

    WU L F, ZHANG B, FENG X F, et al. Case study on pollution rights trading system in Zhejiang Province[J]. Environmental Science and Management,2015,40(5):174-177.
    [10]
    郭默, 毕军, 王金南.中国排污权有偿使用定价及政策影响研究[J]. 中国环境管理,2017,9(1):41-51.

    GUO M, BI J, WANG J N. Pricing the payment for initial emission allowance in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Management,2017,9(1):41-51.
    [11]
    Daniel J Dudek, 秦虎, 张建宇.以SO2排放控制和排污权交易为例分析中国环境执政能力[J]. 环境科学研究,2006,19(增刊 1):44-58.

    DUDEK D J, QIN H, ZHANG J Y. Problems and actions of China environmental governance: a case study on SO2 emission control and emission trade[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences,2006,19(Suppl 1):44-58.
    [12]
    宋福忠, 李凯旋, 李烨楠, 等.基于模糊数学的排污权交易基准价测算模型及其应用[J]. 环境科学研究,2018,31(1):194-200.

    SONG F Z, LI K X, LI Y N, et al. A fuzzy mathematics based on pricing model for emissions trading benchmark price and its application[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences,2018,31(1):194-200.
    [13]
    冯晓飞, 何月峰, 沈海萍.浙江省排污权交易政策实践分析[J]. 环境与可持续发展,2019,44(6):129-131. doi: 10.19758/j.cnki.issn1673-288x.201906129

    FENG X F, HE Y F, SHEN H P. Analysis on the policy practice of emission trading in Zhejiang[J]. Environment and Sustainable Development,2019,44(6):129-131. doi: 10.19758/j.cnki.issn1673-288x.201906129
    [14]
    黄懿, 李庄, 尹福祥, 等.湖南省排污权交易试点工作实践成效与经验探讨[J]. 环境影响评价,2021,43(4):17-23. doi: 10.14068/j.ceia.2021.04.005

    HUANG Y, LI Z, YIN F X, et al. Discussion on the practice effect and experience of emission trading scheme (ETS) pilot in Hunan Province[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment,2021,43(4):17-23. doi: 10.14068/j.ceia.2021.04.005
    [15]
    张志麒, 张保留, 罗宏.工业大气污染治理的环境经济政策体系研究[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2019,9(3):311-319. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.2019.01.140

    ZHANG Z Q, ZHANG B L, LUO H. Research on environmental economic policy system of industrial air pollution control[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2019,9(3):311-319. ⊕ doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.2019.01.140
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)  / Tables(4)

    Article Metrics

    Article Views(180) PDF Downloads(15) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return