Volume 9 Issue 4
Jul.  2019
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Lei HE, Xiang HUANG, Peng SHEN, Xiaoyu LIU, Bao CAO. An empirical study on green investment and economic growth based on investment multipliers[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2019, 9(4): 368-374. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.2019.06.170
Citation: Lei HE, Xiang HUANG, Peng SHEN, Xiaoyu LIU, Bao CAO. An empirical study on green investment and economic growth based on investment multipliers[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2019, 9(4): 368-374. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.2019.06.170

An empirical study on green investment and economic growth based on investment multipliers

doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.2019.06.170
More Information
  • Corresponding author: Bao CAO E-mail: cbao3000@163.com
  • Received Date: 2019-01-02
  • Publish Date: 2019-07-20
  • As one of the important tools of macro-economic policy evaluation, the investment multiplier has been widely applied in both theory and empirical evidence. However traditional investment multiplier does not reflect the environmental cost of economic development, which is not conducive to guiding the development of green economy. The concept and calculation model of green investment multiplier were proposed and Taihu Lake Basin was taken as an example to test the Keynesian four-sector investment multiplier (KS), expanded investment multiplier (KZ) and green investment multiplier (KE) from 2006 to 2014. By comparing and analyzing their influencing parameters of the three types of investment multiplier, it revealed that KS showed a light dynamic change from 2006 to 2014,with no obvious growth or downward trend, and the value of KS was slightly greater than 1 which meant that it had a certain pulling effect on the economy, but not very large. The value of multipliers KZ was greater than 2 and that of KE mostly greater than 3, and especially the multi-year average value of KE was 17.3 percentage points higher than that of KS, indicating that the green investment had a significant pulling effect on the economy. KE showed an increasing trend from 2006 to 2010, however, from year 2010, this trend had changed, with a downward trend of KE. This indicated that the pulling effect of traditional investment on the economy had become weak after 2010. Green investment multiplier can organically link investment, economic growth and environmental costs, and help guide green development. Therefore, it is necessary to increase green investment support to lead a new round of economic growth.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    凯恩斯 . 就业利息和货币通论[M]. 北京:商务印书馆, 1983: 100-105.
    [2]
    保罗·萨缪尔森, 威廉·诺德豪斯 . 经济学[M].18版. 萧琛,译. 北京:人民邮电出版社, 2008.
    [3]
    高鸿业 . 宏观经济学[M].5版. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2011.
    [4]
    帕金, 张军 . 经济学第[M].8版. 北京: 人民邮电出版社, 2009.
    [5]
    STIGLITZ J E . Economics[M]. New York:W W Norton & Company, 1993.
    [6]
    BADE R, PARKIN M. Foundations of microeconomics[M]. Massachusetts: Addison Wesley Press, 2001.
    [7]
    ILZETZKI E, MENDOZA E G, VÉGH C A . How big (small?) are fiscal multipliers[J]. Journal of Monetary Economics, 2011,60(2):239-254.
    [8]
    CARRILLO J A, POILLY C . How do financial frictions affect the spending multiplier during a liquidity trap[J]. Review of Economic Dynamics, 2013,16(2):296-311.
    doi: 10.1016/j.red.2013.01.004
    [9]
    PYUN J H, RHEE D E . Fiscal multipliers during the global financial crisis: fiscal and monetary interaction matters[J]. Contemporary Economic Policy, 2015,33(1):207-220.
    doi: 10.1111/coep.2015.33.issue-1
    [10]
    杨飞虎 . 我国投资乘数、加速数与经济增长探析[J]. 经济与管理研究, 2007(7):38-42.
    [11]
    柳建光, 李子奈 . 关于投资乘数及边际消费倾向计算方法的讨论[J]. 统计研究, 2006(12):66-68.
    [12]
    杨慎可 . 成本渠道与财政支出乘数:基于新凯恩斯模型分析[J]. 财经问题研究, 2014(5):15-21.
    [13]
    沙文兵, 石涛 . 外商直接投资的环境效应:基于中国省级面板数据的实证分析[J]. 世界经济研究, 2006(6):76-81.
    [14]
    黄清子, 张立, 王振振 . 丝绸之路经济带环保投资效应研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2016,26(3):89-99.

    HUANG Q Z, ZHANG L, WANG Z Z . Study of environmental protection investment impact of Silk Road Economic Belt[J]. China Population,Resources and Environment, 2016,26(3):89-99.
    [15]
    张雷, 李新春 . 中国环保投资对经济增长贡献率实证分析[J]. 特区经济, 2009(3):265-266.
    [16]
    朱建华, 徐顺青, 逯元堂 , 等. 中国环保投资与经济增长实证研究:基于误差修正模型和格兰杰因果检验[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2014,24(11):100-103.

    ZHU J H, XU S Q, LU Y T , et al. Empirical research on China environmental protection investment and economic growth based on error correction model and Grainger causality[J]. China Population,Resources and Environment, 2014,24(11):100-103.
    [17]
    郭国庆, 牛海鹏 . 环保投资的经济增长效应研究[J]. 黑龙江社会科学, 2016(1):64-67.
    [18]
    国家发展和改革委员会. 关于印发太湖流域水环境综合治理总体方案(2013年修编)的通知:发改地区〔2013〕2684号[A/OL].( 2013-12-30)[2019-06-13]. http://www.ndrc.gov.cn/zcfb/zcfbtz/201401/t20140114_575695.html.
    [19]
    江苏省统计局. 江苏统计年鉴:2007—2015[EB/OL]. [2019-06-13]. http://tj.jiangsu.gov.cn/col/col70123/index.html.
    [20]
    浙江统计信息网. 浙江统计年鉴:2007 —2015[EB/OL]. [2019-06-13].http://tjj.zj.gov.cn/col/col1525563/index.html.
    [21]
    上海市统计局. 上海统计年鉴:007—2015[EB/OL].[2019-06-13]. http://www.stats-sh.gov.cn/html/sjfb/tjnj/.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article Views(341) PDF Downloads(110) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return